Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature Water volume 3, pages 525–536 (2025)
1198
7
152
Metrics details
Floating photovoltaic solar energy presents an opportunity to mitigate climate change and spare land for other uses, including conservation. However, understanding of the effects of floating photovoltaics (FPVs) on aquatic ecosystems is currently limited. In fact, so far, only a few studies have empirically tested how wildlife responds to FPV deployment and operation. Here we present five key considerations spanning both the direct and indirect effects that FPVs can have on waterbirds and the possible ways waterbirds can interact with and directly affect FPV sites. We examine several aspects of FPVs and their deployment and operation, providing insight into FPV–waterbird dynamics, potential mitigation strategies, and viable concessions for conservation as water surfaces become a more widespread recipient environment for renewable energy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Kruitwagen, L. et al. A global inventory of photovoltaic solar energy generating units. Nature 598, 604–610 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nobre, R. et al. A global study of freshwater coverage by floating photovoltaics. Sol. Energy 267, 112244 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Woolway, R. I., Zhao, G., Rocha, S. M. G., Thackeray, S. J. & Armstrong, A. Decarbonization potential of floating solar photovoltaics on lakes worldwide. Nat. Water 2, 566–576 (2024).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Solfrini, V. et al. ‘Canalvoltaico’ in Emilia-Romagna, Italy: assessing technical, economic and environmental feasibility of suspended photovoltaic panels over water canals. Electronics 12, 4879 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Koondhar, M. A., Albasha, L., Mahariq, I., Graba, B. B. & Touti, E. Reviewing floating photovoltaic (FPV) technology for solar energy generation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 54, 101449 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Huang, G., Tang, Y., Chen, X., Chen, M. & Jiang, Y. A comprehensive review of floating solar plants and potentials for offshore applications. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11, 2064 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
US vineyard uses space saving floatovoltaics. Renew. Energy Focus 9, 64–65 (2008).
He, X., Khan, S., Ozturk, I. & Murshed, M. The role of renewable energy investment in tackling climate change concerns: environmental policies for achieving SDG-13. Sustain. Dev. 31, 1888–1901 (2023).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Carlsen, L. & Bruggemann, R. The 17 United Nations’ sustainable development goals: a status by 2020. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 29, 219–229 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Almeida, R. M. et al. Floating solar power: evaluate trade-offs. Nat. Lond. 606, 246–249 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Exley, G. et al. Scientific and stakeholder evidence-based assessment: ecosystem response to floating solar photovoltaics and implications for sustainability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111639 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Katzner, T. E. et al. Wind energy: an ecological challenge. Science 366, 1206–1207 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Benjamins, S. et al. Potential environmental impacts of floating solar photovoltaic systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 199, 114463 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Exley, G., Armstrong, A., Page, T. & Jones, I. D. Floating photovoltaics could mitigate climate change impacts on water body temperature and stratification. Sol. Energy 219, 24–33 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Hernandez, R. R., Jordaan, S. M., Kaldunski, B. & Kumar, N. Aligning climate change and sustainable development goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Front. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2020.583090 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Moore-O’Leary, K. A. et al. Sustainability of utility-scale solar energy—critical ecological concepts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 385–394 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. How do rotifer communities respond to floating photovoltaic systems in the subsidence wetlands created by underground coal mining in China? J. Environ. Manage. 339, 117816 (2023).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mavraki, N. et al. Fouling community composition on a pilot floating solar-energy installation in the coastal Dutch North Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1223766 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Song, X. et al. Floating photovoltaic systems homogenize the waterbird communities across subsidence wetlands in the North China Plain. J. Environ. Manage. 349, 119417 (2024).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Tian, D., Liu, Z. & Ma, Z. Water-surface photovoltaic systems have affected water physical and chemical properties and biodiversity. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 632 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Amano, T. et al. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature 553, 199–202 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K. V. et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366, 120–124 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mott, R. et al. Measuring habitat quality for waterbirds: a review. Ecol. Evol. 13, e9905 (2023).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cagle, A. E. et al. The land sparing, water surface use efficiency, and water surface transformation of floating photovoltaic solar energy installations. Sustainability 12, 8154 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Luo, W. et al. Conceptual design and model test of a pontoon-truss type offshore floating photovoltaic system with soft connection. Ocean Eng. 309, 118518 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Cazzaniga, R. et al. Floating photovoltaic plants: performance analysis and design solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1730–1741 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Mohammed Niyaz, H. & Gupta, R. Challenges and opportunities towards the development of floating photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 233, 111408 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Trapani, K. & Redón Santafé, M. A review of floating photovoltaic installations: 2007–2013. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 23, 524–532 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Dai, J. et al. Design and construction of floating modular photovoltaic system for water reservoirs. Energy 191, 116549 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Sahu, A., Yadav, N. & Sudhakar, K. Floating photovoltaic power plant: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 66, 815–824 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Harwood, A. J. P., Perrow, M. R., Berridge, R. J., Tomlinson, M. L. & Skeate, E. R. in Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions: Presentations from the CWW2015 Conference (ed. Köppel, J.) 19–41 (Springer, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_2
Mainwaring, M. C. The use of man-made structures as nesting sites by birds: a review of the costs and benefits. J. Nat. Conserv. 25, 17–22 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. & Mueller, G. Review of the performance of the artificial floating island as a restoration tool for aquatic environments. In Proc. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 (eds Babcock, R. W. & Walton, R.) 1–10 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012); https://doi.org/10.1061/40976(316)276
Kosciuch, K., Riser-Espinoza, D., Gerringer, M. & Erickson, W. A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern U.S. PLoS ONE 15, e0232034 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hernandez, R. R. et al. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 766–779 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Tanner, K. E. et al. Microhabitats associated with solar energy development alter demography of two desert annuals. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02349 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Golroodbari, S. M. & Selj, J. in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: From Fundamentals to Applications (eds van Sark, W. et al.) Ch. 28, 455–473 (Wiley, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119578826.ch28
Hartman, C. A., Ackerman, J. T. & Herzog, M. P. Island characteristics within wetlands influence waterbird nest success and abundance. J. Wildl. Manag. 80, 1177–1188 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Burgess, N. D. & Hirons, G. J. M. Creation and management of artificial nesting sites for wetland Birds. J. Environ. Manage. 34, 285–295 (1992).
Article Google Scholar
Menezes, R. F. et al. Variation in fish community structure, richness and diversity in 56 Danish lakes with contrasting depth, size and trophic state: does the method matter? Hydrobiologia 710, 47–59 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Claus, R. & López, M. A methodology to assess the dynamic response and the structural performance of floating photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 262, 111826 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Sagerman, J., Hansen, J. P. & Wikström, S. A. Effects of boat traffic and mooring infrastructure on aquatic vegetation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ambio 49, 517–530 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Jethy, B., Paul, S., Das, S. K., Adesina, A. & Mustakim, S. M. Critical review on the evolution, properties and utilization of plasticwastes for construction applications. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 24, 435–451 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Browne, M. A. et al. Linking effects of anthropogenic debris to ecological impacts. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20142929 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Jagiello, Z., Dylewski, Ł., Tobolka, M. & Aguirre, J. I. Life in a polluted world: a global review of anthropogenic materials in bird nests. Environ. Pollut. 251, 717–722 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kasprzykowski, Z. & Golawski, A. Comparative foraging behavior of 3 heron species in small standing-water ecosystems in the arid zone of Oman. Curr. Zool. 70, 780–785 (2024).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katzner, T. E. et al. Counterfactuals to assess effects to species and systems from renewable energy development. Front. Conserv. Sci. 3, 844286 (2022).
Spencer, R. S., Macknick, J., Aznar, A., Warren, A. & Reese, M. O. Floating photovoltaic systems: assessing the technical potential of photovoltaic systems on man-made water bodies in the continental United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1680–1689 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abdelgaied, M., Kabeel, A. E., Zeleňáková, M. & Abd-Elhamid, H. F. Floating photovoltaic plants as an effective option to reduce water evaporation in water-stressed regions and produce electricity: a case study of Lake Nasser, Egypt. Water 15, 635 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Jin, Y. et al. Energy production and water savings from floating solar photovoltaics on global reservoirs. Nat. Sustain. 6, 865–874 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. et al. Breeding waterbirds in relation to artificial pond attributes: implications for the design of irrigation facilities. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 1627–1639 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Brand, A. B. & Snodgrass, J. W. Value of artificial habitats for amphibian reproduction in altered landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 24, 295–301 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Oliveira, P. M. B., Almeida, R. M. & Cardoso, S. J. Effects of floating photovoltaics on aquatic organisms: a review. Hydrobiologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05686-0 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Armstrong, A., Page, T., Thackeray, S. J., Hernandez, R. R. & Jones, I. D. Integrating environmental understanding into freshwater floatovoltaic deployment using an effects hierarchy and decision trees. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114055 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Exley, G. et al. Floating solar panels on reservoirs impact phytoplankton populations: a modelling experiment. J. Environ. Manage. 324, 116410 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hernandez, R. R. et al. Techno–ecological synergies of solar energy for global sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 2, 560–568 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Haas, J. et al. Floating photovoltaic plants: ecological impacts versus hydropower operation flexibility. Energy Convers. Manag. 206, 112414 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Downing, J. A., Plante, C. & Lalonde, S. Fish production correlated with primary productivity, not the morphoedaphic index. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 1929–1936 (1990).
Article Google Scholar
Su, H. et al. Determinants of trophic cascade strength in freshwater ecosystems: a global analysis. Ecology 102, e03370 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Pan, Y. et al. Microplastics can affect the trophic cascade strength and stability of plankton ecosystems via behavior-mediated indirect interactions. J. Hazard. Mater. 430, 128415 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Horváth, G., Móra, A., Bernáth, B. & Kriska, G. Polarotaxis in non-biting midges: female chironomids are attracted to horizontally polarized light. Physiol. Behav. 104, 1010–1015 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Horváth, G., Kriska, G. & Robertson, B. in Polarized Light and Polarization Vision in Animal Sciences (ed. Horváth, G.) 443–513 (Springer, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54718-8_20
Carvalho, F. et al. Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks. Ecol. Solut. Evid. 4, e12210 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Maghami, M. R. et al. Power loss due to soiling on solar panel: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1307–1316 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Ali, B., Fatima, K., Iqbal, A., Ali, S. S. & Nadeem, M. Experimental investigation of bird dropping and soiling on PV panel power output in a humid and dusty environment. Sukkur IBA J. Emerg. Technol. 7, 1–14 (2024).
Article Google Scholar
Kaldellis, J. K. & Fragos, P. Ash deposition impact on the energy performance of photovoltaic generators. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 311–317 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Karim, M. M., Rimsa, R. & Masud, A. Floating solar plants and relevant environmental, health and safety challenges. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. A 12, 229–241 (2023).
Google Scholar
Allison, T. D. et al. Impacts to Wildlife of Wind Energy Siting and Operation in the United States. Issues in Ecology, Report no. 21 (2019).
Cabral, J. S., Valente, L. & Hartig, F. Mechanistic simulation models in macroecology and biogeography: state-of-art and prospects. Ecography 40, 267–280 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Hanson, J. O. et al. Global conservation of species’ niches. Nature 580, 232–234 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Walston, L. J., Rollins, K. E., LaGory, K. E., Smith, K. P. & Meyers, S. A. A preliminary assessment of avian mortality at utility-scale solar energy facilities in the United States. Renew. Energy 92, 405–414 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Kirby, J. S. et al. Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world’s major flyways. Bird Conserv. Int. 18, S49–S73 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
Sauer, J. R., Fallon, J. E. & Johnson, R. Use of North American breeding bird survey data to estimate population change for bird conservation regions. J. Wildl. Manag. 67, 372–389 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Donald, P. F. et al. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Int. 29, 177–198 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Zimmerman, G. S. et al. Estimating allowable take for an increasing bald eagle population in the United States. J. Wildl. Manag. 86, e22158 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Conkling, T. J. et al. Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 211558 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katzner, T. E. et al. Assessing population-level consequences of anthropogenic stressors for terrestrial wildlife. Ecosphere 11, e03046 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Nickel, B. A., Suraci, J. P., Allen, M. L. & Wilmers, C. C. Human presence and human footprint have non-equivalent effects on wildlife spatiotemporal habitat use. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108383 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Timoney, K. P. & Ronconi, R. A. Annual bird mortality in the bitumen tailings ponds in Northeastern Alberta, Canada. Wilson J. Ornithol. 122, 569–576 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Farwell, L. S., Wood, P. B., Brown, D. J. & Sheehan, J. Proximity to unconventional shale gas infrastructure alters breeding bird abundance and distribution. Condor 121, duz020 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
McClure, C. J. W., Ware, H. E., Carlisle, J., Kaltenecker, G. & Barber, J. R. An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20132290 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. et al. Effects of landscape structure, habitat and human disturbance on birds: a case study in East Dongting Lake wetland. Ecol. Eng. 67, 67–75 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Gibson, D. et al. Impacts of anthropogenic disturbance on body condition, survival and site fidelity of nonbreeding Piping Plovers. Condor 120, 566–580 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
James Reynolds, S., Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Sumasgutner, P. & Mainwaring, M. C. Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. J. Ornithol. 160, 841–860 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Hockin, D. et al. Examination of the effects of disturbance on birds with reference to its importance in ecological assessments. J. Environ. Manage. 36, 253–286 (1992).
Article Google Scholar
Halfwerk, W. et al. Adaptive changes in sexual signalling in response to urbanization. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 374–380 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Soh, M. C. K. et al. Restricted human activities shift the foraging strategies of feral pigeons (Columba livia) and three other commensal bird species. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108927 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Verhulst, S., Holveck, M.-J. & Riebel, K. Long-term effects of manipulated natal brood size on metabolic rate in zebra finches. Biol. Lett. 2, 478–480 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Newton, I. & Brockie, K. Population Limitation in Birds (Academic Press, 2003).
Lepczyk, C. A. et al. Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Conserv. Biol. 22, 405–416 (2008).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Desholm, M. & Kahlert, J. Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm. Biol. Lett. 1, 296–298 (2005).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Diehl, R. H., Valdez, E. W., Preston, T. M., Wellik, M. J. & Cryan, P. M. Evaluating the effectiveness of wildlife detection and observation technologies at a solar power tower facility. PLoS ONE 11, e0158115 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
May, R., Reitan, O., Bevanger, K., Lorentsen, S.-H. & Nygård, T. Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42, 170–181 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Conway, C. J. Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol. Waterbirds 34, 319–346 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Thaxter, C. B. et al. Bird and bat species’ global vulnerability to collision mortality at wind farms revealed through a trait-based assessment. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170829 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Desholm, M., Fox, A. D., Beasley, P. D. L. & Kahlert, J. Remote techniques for counting and estimating the number of bird–wind turbine collisions at sea: a review. Ibis 148, 76–89 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. & Dwyer, J. F. Avian interactions with renewable energy infrastructure: an update. Condor 118, 411–423 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Smallwood, K. S. Utility-scale solar impacts to volant wildlife. J. Wildl. Manag. 86, e22216 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Huso, M. M., Dietsch, T. & Nicolai, C. Mortality Monitoring Design for Utility-Scale Solar Power Facilities Open-File Report (US Geological Survey, 2016); https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161087
Bradshaw, T. M. et al. Marsh bird occupancy of wetlands managed for waterfowl in the Midwestern USA. PLoS ONE 15, e0228980 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ralph, C. J., Droege, S. & Sauer, J. R. in Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149, 161–168 (US Department of Agriculture, 1995).
Conway, C. J. & Gibbs, J. P. Effectiveness of call-broadcast surveys for monitoring marsh birds. Auk 122, 26–35 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Allen, T., Finkbeiner, S. L. & Johnson, D. H. Comparison of detection rates of breeding marsh birds in passive and playback surveys at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota. Waterbirds 27, 277–281 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Magurran, A. E., Green, R. E. & Fewster, R. M. Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 243–254 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sillett, T. S., Chandler, R. B., Royle, J. A., Kéry, M. & Morrison, S. A. Hierarchical distance-sampling models to estimate population size and habitat-specific abundance of an island endemic. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1997–2006 (2012).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Conway, C. J., Sulzman, C. & Raulston, B. E. Factors affecting detection probability of California black rails. J. Wildl. Manag. 68, 360–370 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on escape from predatory attack: a survey of North American birds. Wilson Bull. 105, 1–47 (1993).
Google Scholar
Sen, A., Mohankar, A. S., Khamaj, A. & Karmakar, S. Emerging OSH issues in installation and maintenance of floating solar photovoltaic projects and their link with sustainable development goals. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 14, 1939–1957 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akomea-Ampeh, M. et al. Metal contaminant risk at active floating photovoltaic sites and future research roadmap. J. Environ. Manage. 383, 125216 (2025).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Richard, F.-J. et al. Warning on nine pollutants and their effects on avian communities. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 32, e01898 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fairbrother, A. et al. Temperature and light intensity effects on photodegradation of high-density polyethylene. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 165, 153–160 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Panthi, G., Bajagain, R., An, Y.-J. & Jeong, S.-W. Leaching potential of chemical species from real perovskite and silicon solar cells. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 149, 115–122 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ali, H., Khan, E. & Ilahi, I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: environmental persistence, toxicity and bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 6730305 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
McHale, M. E. & Sheehan, K. L. Bioaccumulation, transfer, and impacts of microplastics in aquatic food chains. J. Environ. Expo. Assess 3, 15 (2024).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fleeger, J. W., Carman, K. R. & Nisbet, R. M. Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 317, 207–233 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aghaei, M. et al. Review of degradation and failure phenomena in photovoltaic modules. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112160 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Buitrago, E., Novello, A. M. & Meyer, T. Third-generation solar cells: toxicity and risk of exposure. Helv. Chim. Acta 103, e2000074 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Petroli, P. A., Camargo, P. S. S., de Souza, R. A. & Veit, H. M. Assessment of toxicity tests for photovoltaic panels: a review. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 47, 100885 (2024).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kwak, J. I., Nam, S.-H., Kim, L. & An, Y.-J. Potential environmental risk of solar cells: current knowledge and future challenges. J. Hazard. Mater. 392, 122297 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sahu, A. K., Sudhakar, K. & Sarviya, R. M. Influence of UV light on the thermal properties of HDPE/carbon black composites. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 15, 100534 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Bilal, M. et al. Microplastic quantification in aquatic birds: biomonitoring the environmental health of the Panjkora River freshwater ecosystem in Pakistan. Toxics 11, 972 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bange, A., Backes, A., Garthe, S. & Schwemmer, P. Prey choice and ingestion of microplastics by common shelducks and common eiders in the Wadden Sea World Heritage Site. Mar. Biol. 170, 54 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Jeyavani, J. et al. A review on aquatic impacts of microplastics and its bioremediation aspects. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 7, 286–299 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Holland, E. R., Mallory, M. L. & Shutler, D. Plastics and other anthropogenic debris in freshwater birds from Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 571, 251–258 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sazima, I. & D’Angelo, G. B. Dangerous traps: Anhingas mistake anthropogenic debris for prey fish at an urban site in south-eastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 23, 380–384 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Damian, M. & Fraser, G. S. Incorporation of anthropogenic debris into double-crested cormorant nests, Toronto, Ontario. J. Gt Lakes Res. 46, 1761–1766 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Green, D. S. in Plastics in the Aquatic Environment—Part I: Current Status and Challenges (eds Stock, F. et al.) 111–133 (Springer, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_509
Arnot, J. A. & Gobas, F. A. P. C. A food web bioaccumulation model for organic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23, 2343–2355 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Galloway, T. S., Cole, M. & Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 116 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hardesty, B. D., Good, T. P. & Wilcox, C. Novel methods, new results and science-based solutions to tackle marine debris impacts on wildlife. Ocean Coast. Manag. 115, 4–9 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Download references
We thank Z. Goff-Eldredge and S.M. Grodsky for their contributions, as well as L.J. Cantrell, who provided expertise and insight on real-world FPV operations and management that improved this paper. We also thank T. Remo, A. Davis, G. Allen and D. Ernst for access and assistance at each FPV site. We are grateful to P. Sanzenbacher for critical feedback on this manuscript and we thank M. Marmotta for her contributions to the creation and refinement of figures that enhanced the clarity of this work. Funding for R.R.H., E.F. and E.P.S. was provided by the University of California Office of the President’s California Climate Action Seed Grant (award A24-1267). R.R.H., E.F. and A.E.C. were funded by a grant from Enel Green Power S.p.A. and the US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office award no. DE-EE0008746. Funding for T.J.C. and T.E.K. was provided by the US Bureau of Land Management and by the US Geological Survey. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Department of Land, Air & Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Rebecca R. Hernandez, Emma Forester, Alexander E. Cagle, Jocelyn T. Rodriguez & Elliott P. Steele
Wild Energy Center, The Energy and Efficiency Institute, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA
Rebecca R. Hernandez, Emma Forester, Alexander E. Cagle, Jocelyn T. Rodriguez & Elliott P. Steele
US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, ID, USA
Tara J. Conkling & Todd E. Katzner
University of Central Florida Collection of Arthropods (UCFC), Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Sandor L. Kelly
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Giles Exley & Alona Armstrong
Innovation of Enel Green Power S.p.A., Pisa, Italy
Giulia Pasquale & Miriam Lucia Vincenza Di Blasi
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Elliott P. Steele.
G.P. and M.L.V.D.B. reports a relationship with Enel Green Power SpA that includes: employment. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Nature Water thanks Chunlin Li and Steven Benjamins for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Hernandez, R.R., Forester, E., Cagle, A.E. et al. Aligning floating photovoltaic solar energy expansion with waterbird conservation. Nat Water 3, 525–536 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00429-4
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00429-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Discover Sustainability (2025)
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering (2025)
Advertisement
Nature Water (Nat Water)
ISSN 2731-6084 (online)
© 2025 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
