Solar Power World
By Kelly Pickerel | December 8, 2025
In July, the Trump administration initiated a Sec. 232 investigation into the polysilicon industry. An affirmative Sec. 232 ruling would let the federal government impose tariffs on imported products if they are deemed a threat to national security. The “goal” of Sec. 232 tariffs is to limit imports and boost domestic manufacturing.
Credit: Hemlock
The Dept. of Commerce received almost 50 public comments on the matter, including from domestic solar panel players, polysilicon-focused companies and various trade associations. Most of the commenters were involved with the solar industry, although some groups commented on polysilicon’s role in the semiconductor industry, including Tesla.
Commerce was analyzing the demand for polysilicon in the United States and whether domestic production can meet such demand. Polysilicon production in the United States was essentially gutted during the China-America trade war of the 2010s. The three main U.S. polysilicon producers — Hemlock, Wacker and REC Silicon — saw their market share shrink from $1 billion in 2011 to $107 million in 2018 after China placed high duties on American-made polysilicon. China has since overtaken the global market, now estimated to hold a 93.5% market share.
Hemlock and Wacker are still producing polysilicon in the United States, both for the solar and electronics markets, but REC Silicon has since dropped out. New company Highland Materials is attempting to start a polysilicon production plant in Tennessee. There are also a handful of non-China players that contribute to the solar industry, including OCI in Malaysia and Wacker’s German plant. Intertek CEA estimates that there is only 92,000 metric tons (mt) of polysilicon capacity currently operational outside of China. Meanwhile, China’s operational polysilicon capacity reached 3,250,000 mt in 2024.
It’s generally estimated that it takes 2,500 mt of polysilicon to make 1 GW of silicon solar panels. If the United States took all 92,000 mt of the non-Chinese polysilicon supply available, that would produce just 36.8 GW of panels. The United States is averaging a 50-GW solar demand annually, showing that not only can the domestic polysilicon industry not meet the country’s solar demand, nor can the entire non-Chinese supply.
But not just polysilicon is involved in the Sec. 232 investigation — the government is looking at every product that contains polysilicon. Not only could pure polysilicon imports be tariffed, but silicon wafers, solar cells and panels could be tacked with an additional tax too.
One of the commenters, bipartisan group Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA), suggested a range of tariffs on solar products under Sec. 232:
A decision by the federal government was expected by year’s end. Roth Capital Partners reported in late summer that PPAs were already being drawn up with “reopeners” that would allow contracts to be renegotiated based on changes to tariffs, due to the uncertainty around the Sec. 232 investigation.
Kelly Pickerel has more than 15 years of experience reporting on the U.S. solar industry and is currently editor in chief of Solar Power World.

Clinton Harbison says
December 10, 2025 at 3:12 pm
Does that supply of First Solar modules account for the massive number of spare panels you need to order to replace the panels that break when you look at them before trying to install them?
Brian Hansen says
December 9, 2025 at 2:19 pm
Great piece, Kelly! I’d like to add one caveat to the available polysilicon for the US. While it’s true there isn’t enough non-China poly available to meet the US’s demands, the total doesn’t account for the massive capacity that First Solar has. Thus, if you couple FSLR with the non-China poly, there is enough capacity to support all US installations, assuming almost all of the non-China poly is used in US modules.
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website


Δ
Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | RSS

source