El Paso Electric's rate hike faces resistance as judges recommend lower profit margin – KFOX

Now
39°
Wed
70°
Thu
72°
by Julia Spencer
El Paso Electric's proposed rate increase, which could add over $22 to monthly bills, is facing opposition as Texas administrative law judges recommend modifications to the request.
The utility company initially sought to raise the average residential bill by about $22 a month, generating an additional $93 million annually to fund new projects.
However, after El Paso city leaders rejected the proposal in June, the city of El Paso requested a contested hearing with the state.

Julia Spencer reports on El Paso Electric rate hike (Credit: KFOX14)


RECOMMENDED: El Paso Water lays out proposed 12% rate increase during City Council work session
The judges are now suggesting changes, including reducing the company's requested profit from 10.7% to 9.4%.
Additionally, the recommended proposal would maintain current bills for rooftop solar customers and require New Mexico customers to share the cost of the Newman 6 power plant, rather than placing the burden solely on Texas customers.
Residents have expressed mixed feelings about the proposed rate hike.
One resident said, "Honestly, I don't like it, but that's the way everything is going in the world."
Another added, "People in the economy is not doing good right now and to have a spike in your electricity, you know, a necessity that you need to live."
RECOMMENDED: 3 UTEP football players, manager arrested on separate charges earlier this month
The city of El Paso stated that the recommendation comes after the utility refused to negotiate, leading to a hearing process that hadn't occurred in over 30 years.
A final decision on the rate increase now rests with the Public Utility Commission.
Below you can read the city of El Paso's full release below:

Sign up to receive the top interesting stories from in and around our community once daily in your inbox.
2025 Sinclair, Inc.

source

This entry was posted in Renewables. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply