by Neil Martin, University of New South Wales
edited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
scientific editor
lead editor
Graph showing the long tail problem of PV degradation rates. Credit: Yang Tang, USNW Sydney.
New research has uncovered a critical challenge in solar energy with the discovery that a considerable number of solar panels degrade much more rapidly than expected. About a fifth of solar panels examined in a new study fail much faster than expected and some may last for only half their anticipated lifetime.
Experts from UNSW have identified the reason behind the so-called “long tail” in the probability distribution of the performance data after analyzing information obtained from nearly 11,000 different photovoltaic samples globally.
The long tail appears on graphs showing the degradation rate per year of the panels, indicating that up to 20% of all samples perform 1.5 times worse than the average.
In other words, a significant number of panels do not degrade at a constant rate over a long period of time as might be anticipated, but instead lose energy or fail unexpectedly much sooner.
The discovery is important in terms of raising the standard of solar panels and making solar farms more cost-effective and reliable.
“Most solar systems are designed to last around 25 years, based on their warranty period,” said Yang Tang, one of the authors of a paper on the subject published in the IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.
“For the entire dataset, we observed that system performance typically declines by around 0.9% per year. However, our findings show extreme degradation rates in some of the systems. At least 1 in 5 systems degrade at least 1.5 times faster than this typical rate, and roughly 1 in 12 degrade twice as fast. This means that for some systems, their useful life could be closer to just 11 years. Or, in other words, they could lose about 45% of their output by the 25-year mark.”
The UNSW team, including Dr. Fiacre Rougieux, Dr. Shukla Poddar, Associate Professor Merlinde Kay and Ph.D. student Yang Tang from the School of Photovoltaic and Renewable Energy Engineering, analyzed information collated previously by Dr. Dirk Jordan from the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
This is a collection of the annual production data from tens of thousands of photovoltaic systems produced globally and includes statistics on performance and maintenance.
The UNSW team found that although many panels do degrade smoothly and predictably, when the results are plotted on a graph there is a long tail of samples that fail a lot more rapidly than should be expected.
This long tail is more than a statistical oddity. It especially poses a large financial risk for solar farms, where hundreds of thousands of panels are installed, since the data indicates there is a hidden cost associated with samples that do not perform as well or for as long as they should.
Importantly, it has also been shown that the extreme degradation observed in these panels is not related to the climatic conditions they are exposed to—ruling out the possibility that the data was being skewed by samples placed in extreme environmental locations such as very hot deserts.
Instead, the study found three major reasons for panels to be grouped in the long tail.
The first is interconnected failures. This highlights a scenario where different types of problems can interact with each other on an individual panel. For example, if the backsheet (a protective layer on the rear of a module) is damaged, moisture can get in possibly causing a failure of the electrical junction box and other problems such as cell cracks or corrosion.
This domino effect, where the issues don’t just add up but instead multiply, can be seen to make panels degrade much faster than predicted.
The second reason is rapid failure when modules are relatively new, dubbed infant mortality. Modules tend to have a slight recovery and slower degradation rate after the initial period of installation. These panels likely have critical manufacturing defects or material flaws that are not discovered in quality control or testing and therefore fail rapidly—sometimes within just a few years of installation.
Finally, there are minor flaws that may not cause a problem initially, but then result in a sudden severe performance loss at a random point. This could be a tiny hairline crack in a cell, or slightly imperfect soldering that goes unnoticed until complete failure.
Importantly, these three factors occur regardless of the location where the panels are installed. This highlights the fact that climate is not a factor in the long tail of degradation rates, which was one hypothesis being considered.
Dr. Poddar, a co-author of the paper, said, “A subset of the data shows information specifically related to solar modules in very hot climates which we know causes higher degradation.
“However, in other climates, when those hot regions are being excluded from the analysis, we see a similar long-tail pattern in the probability distribution of performance degradation rate. This suggests that the issue is consistent regardless of where the panels are operating.
“Current testing standards focus primarily on three parameters: the modules’ response to mechanical stress, extreme temperatures, and exposure to ultraviolet radiation—as well as often testing for humidity and response to a standardized amount of sunlight (AM1.5 spectrum).
“But when they are actually operating in real-world conditions, there are so many different factors coming into play, and those cascading failures can be very significant. So I think we need to start thinking about different testing standards which would help to ensure we have more resilient types of modules.”
The research is important for solar panel manufacturers and those spending many millions of dollars to build large solar arrays to provide clean energy. The long tail phenomenon challenges the financial models that underpin the industry’s growth, creating uncertainty in long-term energy yield and operational budgets.
If the real-world failure rate is much higher and panels degrade much sooner than expected, as shown in the UNSW study, there will be unforeseen expenditure required by operators for repairs or module replacements.
“With this research, we are hoping to make real impact in three ways,” said Dr. Poddar. “We would like to get even more data from large-scale solar farms to analyze real-world failure rates in even more detail, so we can then make recommendations to the manufacturers of these modules.
“Secondly, we aim to understand different factors contributing to module failures in different climate types to develop early detection system and recommend manufacturers to improve design robustness.
“Thirdly, testing authorities should be informed of real-world degradation patterns across diverse climates and consider combining stress tests to better replicate outdoor operating conditions.”
More information: Y. Tang et al, Understanding and Reducing the Risk of Extreme Photovoltaic Degradation, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics (2026). DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2025.3627676
Journal information: IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
Provided by University of New South Wales
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Optional (only if you’d like a response)
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X’s mission by getting a premium account.
2 shares
This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
Analysis of nearly 11,000 photovoltaic systems shows that about 20% of solar panels degrade at least 1.5 times faster than average, with some losing up to 45% of output by 25 years. This accelerated degradation is linked to interconnected failures, early-life defects, and latent flaws, rather than climate. Current testing standards may not adequately predict these real-world failures.
This summary was automatically generated using LLM. Full disclaimer
Cracking the ‘long tail’ problem: New research targets hidden solar panel issue
Note:
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Tech Xplore in any form.
About
Tech Xplore provides the latest news and updates on information technology, robotics and engineering, covering a wide range of subjects.
Tech Xplore is a part of Science X network. With global reach of over 5 million monthly readers and featuring dedicated websites for hard sciences, technology, medical research and health news, the Science X network is one of the largest online communities for science-minded people.
Science X Account
Forgot Password?
Not a member? Sign up.
Identify the news topics you want to see and prioritize an order.
Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox
© Tech Xplore 2014 – 2026 powered by Science X Network
Stay informed with Science X Daily and Weekly email newsletters—free technology updates delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe now for your favorite topics and receive a confirmation link to customize your preferences.
Science never stops. Get notified about trending stories.
Your privacy
This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
