Ryan Mayfield led an informative discussion on the history of the NEC PV Hazard Control System rules and the latest changes to the UL 3741 standard.
Image: 12019, Pixabay
Rules requiring rapid shutdown of photovoltaic (PV) systems installed on buildings in the United States have been part of the National Electrical Code since 2014, and exist primarily to protect firefighters and first responders from harm when they must work around rooftop PV arrays.
Industry compliance with these rules, which govern the requirement to reduce the voltage in the wires both inside and outside the boundary of an array within a certain amount of time after the system is shut down, has largely been maintained through the use of module-level rapid shutdown devices that mount under each solar panel in an array.
However, as thinking has evolved around the safety and simplicity of PV systems, so have the rules surrounding rapid shutdown. New requirements for “PV Hazard Control Systems” allow compliance with the rules as long as components within the array have been certified under the UL 3741 standard.
This evolution was the subject of a recent webinar hosted by Ryan Mayfield of Mayfield Renewables, a technical consulting and engineering firm that also hosts education and training seminars approved for continuing education credits by the North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners (NABCEP).
Mayfield was joined on the call by three experts on PV rapid shutdown requirements:
The importance of UL 3741
With the establishment of PV rapid shutdown requirements in 2014, module-level rapid shutdown became the norm for residential rooftop solar installations, while many builders of commercial PV arrays turned to placing string inverters within 10 feet of the array boundary to comply with the rules. 
Following adjustments to the rules in the 2017 NEC, module-level rapid shutdown became the dominant method of compliance across the industry.
Some in the solar industry— including panelist Derek Mast — argue that employing these module-level shutdown devices results in PV systems with too many potential points of failure. The PV Hazard Control System rules exist to provide an alternative method of compliance with the shutdown requirements.   
“UL 3741 represents hope that we can avoid using too many components to satisfy safety regulations,” writes Mast on his website. However, he points out, it is essential to understand that “everything in a UL-3741-listed array needs to be specifically listed with everything else” for the most common path to certification.
Therefore, complying with PV Hazard Control System standards requires its own complex understanding of how components in a system work together to meet the NEC safety requirements. Growing this understanding among a diverse mix of solar industry colleagues, code officers, and local inspectors was the reason behind hosting the AMA webinar.
Building awareness of changes to UL 3741 and PV Hazard Control System rules in the NEC
The Mayfield panel of experts opened the webinar by discussing the facts behind rapid shutdown requirements and tracing the historical evolution of the UL 3741 standard over time.
The conversation then turned to significant changes introduced in the latest revision of UL 3741 approved by ANSI on October 20, 2025. These include more specific requirements for components like wire management devices, barriers, and polymeric materials pulled from other UL standards, along with improved testing methods.
The panel also addressed the three paths to UL 3741 compliance for rapid shutdown components:
For now, path 2 still provides the most common route to UL 3741 compliance. Schwarz gave viewers a peek behind the curtain of the standard development, asserting that changes to UL 3741 compliance testing “simplify the process and make it closer to the original intent.” 
He outlined three tests performed on PV arrays in UL 3741 compliance testing that closely resemble the kinds of “accidental interactions” firefighters may have with a PV array:
Schwarz highlighted the importance of consistency in these testing methods, pointing out that only by including all the components of a PV array (racking, mounts, wire management, etc.) can these tests be made repeatable, and therefore valid. 
Other panelists expanded upon this view, with Mast pointing out that the path to compliance runs through racking manufacturers, whose installation guides will specify which other components must be used to maintain compliance. He cautioned installation managers to “make sure you’re training the installers to actually look at the installation manual. It’s not just ‘install it and use whatever wire management technique you would like.’”
Mayfield agreed, saying “Understanding the means and methods of installing is really the critical piece here. If you’re never read (the full UL 3741 standard), I’m not going to blame you. But if you never read the manual, I will absolutely blame you.”
Final thoughts: expanding UL 3741 adoption
Transitioning the commercial and residential solar industry away from the methods of rapid shutdown compliance to which they have become accustomed is a long-term endeavor, but despite the complicated nature of UL 3741 compliance, adoption is growing among installers. 
Panelist Glenn Woodruff says his team is focusing on simplifying and streamlining installation instructions for installers and bringing more interchangeability of compliant products. He explained that he sees a willingness to become educated about UL 3741 among local inspectors at authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs), but says that financing companies may want a higher level of diligence regarding compliance before being willing to back projects.
Woodruff and Mayfield agreed they see between 20 and 30 percent of installations now including 3741-complaint systems, and are hopeful that number will grow over time. 
The full UL 3741 AMA webinar will be published to the Mayfield Renewables YouTube channel, and Mayfield also offers a full-length class on the UL 3741 standard.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from Ben Zientara
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
pv magazine USA offers daily updates of the latest photovoltaics news. We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.
Δ
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy © pv magazine 2026
Δ
Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source