Last chance: Deadline just hours away.
Our Summer Membership Drive ends soon, and, to be frank, we’re far from our goal. The stories you see on our site right now were made possible by reader support. Help power the next stories by making a gift today.
This is our final call for support this month. Can you pitch in?
The deadline for our Summer Membership Drive is just hours away. And, to be frank, we’re far from our goal. Help power our next investigations by making a gift of any amount today.
Farmers grow tea under solar panels in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China, April 2026.Pan Weifeng/VCG via Getty
This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
China has emerged as the sole winner in Asia from the strait of Hormuz crisis, according to a report published on Tuesday.
The report by the geopolitical consulting firm Asia Group concluded that China had weathered the storm of the global commodities crisis resulting from the closure of the Middle Eastern waterway, and also stood to gain from the economic and geopolitical trends sparked by the wider conflict.
“China weathered the initial shock better than any regional peer.”
Iran virtually closed the strait, a vital waterway through which much of the world’s oil and gas flows, after the US and Israel launched joint strikes on February 28, targeting government and military sites and killing Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. The ensuing crisis has sent global energy prices soaring, with Asia particularly exposed.
The report noted that before the strait’s closure, roughly 80 percent of the oil and nearly 90 percent of the liquefied natural gas transiting the waterway was destined for Asian markets, along with a significant share of other critical commodities.
The report looked at Asia’s largest economies—China, India, Japan, and South Korea—as well as emerging markets across south-east Asia. The researchers mapped the economic and political repercussions of the crisis and its impacts across key sectors including manufacturing, energy, and agriculture.
They concluded that China was a clear winner from the crisis caused by Donald Trump’s foray into the Middle East.
The country’s large stockpiles of oil and the hugely ambitious rollout of renewable energy mean it has been less exposed to the energy shock than other countries.
China has long maintained strategic reserves of energy, and last year took advantage of cheap prices to build up even bigger stockpiles. Its crude imports grew from 11.1 millin barrels a day to 11.6 million in 2025, with over 80 percent of that increase being sent to stockpiles, according to analysis by Erica Downs, a senior research scholar at the Centre on Global Energy Policy. As of January, China had enough stockpiled to cover 104 days of imports at the 2025 level.
The country has also been building massive amounts of renewable energy infrastructure in recent years. Last year it installed 315GW of new solar capacity, more than half of the world’s new solar. The year before, it added 277GW. Beijing is aiming for half of China’s energy to come from non-fossil sources by 2030, with the share from wind and solar reaching 30 percent, up from 22 percent in 2025.
Although China’s energy mix is still largely based on coal, which accounts for more than 50 percent, renewables’ share is increasing rapidly.
“It’s tempting to see any loss of credibility in the US as a benefit for China, but that’s not necessarily the case for Beijing.”
The Asia Group’s report said: “With 1.4 terawatts of operating renewable capacity already online and a reported 90-110 days of crude import cover in reserve, China weathered the initial shock better than any regional peer.”
China has also benefited from other countries reacting to the crisis by accelerating its clean energy buildout. Beijing dominates the global supply chain in solar and other clean technology industries and in recent years has been pushing much of this production overseas at low prices, to the chagrin of western leaders worried about their own industries.
China’s electric vehicle exports soared by more than 110 percent in May compared with the previous year, while solar shipments in April increased by 60 percent.
Beijing has called for a ceasefire in the Middle East, and when Trump visited in May and met China’s president, Xi Jinping, he claimed the two countries were united in wanting to find a settlement. But the Asia Group report noted: “The crisis allows Beijing to cast the United States as the destabilizing actor whose Middle East entanglements impose costs on the world.”
There are some risks to China from the instability. Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, said: “It’s tempting to see any loss of credibility in the US as a benefit for China, but that’s not necessarily the case for Beijing, which does not want to supplant Washington as a Middle East hegemon or provider of security for the region.”
Wen-Ti Sung, a non-resident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub, based in Taiwan, said the crisis could also make Beijing think twice about a future military assault on Taiwan because it showed the difficulty of navigating ships through hostile territory.
The Asia Group’s report concluded: “Ultimately Beijing views the pain points not as existential threats, but as challenges to be managed and even opportunities to be exploited.”
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from Mother Jones and our partners.
Our Summer Membership Drive ends in just a few hours, and we’re still far from our goal. Campaigns like this one are what help us fund research, reporter travel, records requests, and so much more. Because we’re not backed by a billionaire or a corporation, we depend on readers like you to help fund these initiatives.
Last call! Can you help us today?
We want to be able to cover every issue, especially those coming out of DC as we approach the midterms. Help ensure that we can continue digging into every issue, asking the hard questions, and relentlessly seeking the truth. Make a donation of any amount today, and make a difference for independent journalism.
Our Summer Membership Drive ends in just a few hours, and we’re still far from our goal. Campaigns like this one are what help us fund research, reporter travel, records requests, and so much more. Because we’re not backed by a billionaire or a corporation, we depend on readers like you to help fund these initiatives.
Last call! Can you help us today?
We want to be able to cover every issue, especially those coming out of DC as we approach the midterms. Help ensure that we can continue digging into every issue, asking the hard questions, and relentlessly seeking the truth. Make a donation of any amount today, and make a difference for independent journalism.
Casey Michel
Alex Nguyen
Tik Root
Isabel Hilton
Pema Levy
Michael Mechanic
Sophie Hurwitz
Sponsored Post
CARE
Reveal
Madison Pauly
Pema Levy
Sophie Hurwitz and Julia Métraux
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from Mother Jones and our partners.
Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.
Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible
Inexpensive, too! Subscribe today and get a full year of Mother Jones for just $19.95.
Award-winning photojournalism.
Stunning video. Fearless conversations.
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from Mother Jones and our partners.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2026 Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting. All Rights Reserved.
And we respect that! But maybe you’d consider supporting our work directly? Right now, we need to raise $200,000 to fund more journalism that seeks the truth and holds power to account. We can’t miss this goal—and we can’t do this work without you. Give today.
We noticed you have an ad blocker on. Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones’ investigative journalism?
Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.
