Intium Grid Connection Advisory Lead Saket Upadhyay shares with pv magazine a technical breakdown on how developers are solving generator performance standards compliance before getting to site, as grid connection delays remain bottlenecks for Australia’s renewable energy targets and its ability to achieve ultra low-cost solar.
In particular, Upadhyay said Clause 5.3.4A compliance remains one of the costliest technical execution bottlenecks for utility solar and battery energy storage systems (BESS) assets in the National Electricity Market (NEM), frequently stalling technically sound projects right at the finish line.
What are your thoughts on ARENA’s recent Ultra Low-Cost Solar White Paper Update, and sector momentum?
ARENA’s white paper arrives at a critical point for Australia’s renewable energy market. Australia is progressing rapidly with solar and battery energy storage projects, but these projects continue to experience delays throughout development, construction, and grid connection activities.
The National Electricity Market (NEM) connection process remains a key milestone for renewable energy projects.
Identifying grid connection risks early, ensuring accurate power system models, and aligning plant performance with generator performance standards (GPS) requirements are critical to reducing connection delays and supporting successful project delivery.
Why do utility-scale solar and BESS assets get caught in regulatory loops?
The increasing penetration of inverter-based resources (IBR) has resulted in greater focus from the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) and Network Service Providers (NSPs) on power system stability, system strength, and compliance with GPS.
Projects can experience extended review cycles because dynamic performance must be demonstrated against site-specific network conditions.
This requires accurate modelling and validation of plant behaviour to confirm that inverter controls, plant controllers, and associated systems can meet required performance standards during normal operation and network disturbances.
What is one of the key drivers of connection delays?
That would be late-stage technical changes during commissioning, such as adjustments to power plant controller (PPC) settings, battery energy storage system (BESS) energy management system (EMS) configuration, protection settings, software interfaces, or power system model parameters.
These changes may require additional technical assessment, model updates, and further coordination with AEMO, NSPs, OEMs, and project stakeholders. Establishing plant design requirements, control philosophies, and validated performance expectations early in the project lifecycle helps minimise repeated reviews and reduces the risk of commissioning delays.
How do front-loaded factory acceptance test (FAT) and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing resolve compliance early?
HIL testing can reduce integration risks by validating key control functions before equipment arrives onsite.
HIL testing allows the actual PPC and associated control interfaces to be tested within a real-time simulation environment that represents expected network conditions.
This enables earlier validation of plant control behaviour and interaction between the PPC, inverters, EMS, and other plant systems.
What should testing include?
Testing should include relevant performance assessments such as voltage control, frequency response, active and reactive power control, fault ride-through behaviour, and control system interactions.
GPS assessments and OEM validation activities often require detailed technical coordination between developers, OEMs, consultants, NSPs, and AEMO to confirm model accuracy and demonstrate compliance. Identifying and resolving technical issues earlier reduces the likelihood of late engineering changes, commissioning delays, and additional project costs.
What are some key technical considerations for BESS and solar interfaces to ensure seamless R2 testing?
Successful post-commissioning R2 validation depends on several critical technical foundations.
Firstly, establishing a clear communication and control hierarchy between the PPC, inverters, BESS EMS, protection systems, and SCADA is essential.
Proper coordination helps avoid conflicting control actions and supports stable plant operation while meeting GPS requirements.
Secondly, completing pre-energisation RMS and EMT dynamic studies, supported by HIL testing where appropriate, helps confirm model-to-site alignment. These studies validate expected performance for reactive power capability, voltage control, active power response, and fault ride-through behaviour before the plant operates under live network conditions.
Finally, implementing robust data logging, firmware version control, and high-resolution disturbance recording during commissioning provides essential information for model validation and compliance assessment.
Accurate operational data supports efficient troubleshooting, improves the efficiency of technical reviews, and reduces the risk of repeated commissioning activities to demonstrate compliance.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: [email protected].
Comments
Please login to comment
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
3:00 pm – 4:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Entries open in seven categories: Modules, Inverters, BoS, BESS, Manufacturing, Sustainability, Projects.
April 01 – August 31, 2026
Tuesday, August 25, 2026
10:00 am – 11:00 am CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Thursday, October 7, 2026
11:00 am – 12:30 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
You have no items in your basket.
