On July 28, 2026, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau added foreign-produced power inverters to its official covered list of equipment and services. This amounted to an immediate ban on new inverter equipment authorizations for unapproved foreign models, with regulators citing national security and digital espionage concerns.
The directive distinguishes between products seeking approval and authorized inverters that have already been deployed. New restrictions only apply to inverters with next-generation hardware designs. Existing inverter models that already hold valid FCC equipment credentials are unaffected – they can still be imported, sold and deployed.
The vast majority of commercial, industrial and utility-scale installations scheduled for construction over the next 12 to 18 months will experience little disruption, as they will be using already approved hardware. For new unproved foreign-produced inverters, the approval gate has closed. Long-term plans to introduce new technology have been frozen.
The inverter ban initially targeted bidirectional wireless connectivity in modern smart inverters on the grounds they represent an unacceptable security risk. This was despite a January 2026 Department of Energy analysis that inspected 30 Chinese inverters and found zero evidence of malicious hardware tampering.
Market observers at Intertek CEA said the original rules apply to inverters containing components that enable remote communication, control, sensing, data collection, or monitoring through wifi, cellular, Bluetooth, or similar wireless connections.
[Updated Aug 20, 2026]: The FCC clarified and expanded this scope to explicitly include both wired connections (such as Ethernet) and wireless connections. Furthermore, the restriction strictly applies to utility-interactive inverters (UL 1741 compliant); off-grid, non-utility-interactive inverters and standalone AC-to-DC rectifiers are excluded.
The language of the ban creates near-term ambiguity for hardwired utility-scale inverters, but Wood Mackenzie noted that leading manufacturers are notifying clients that they believe their products do not fall under the scope of the ban. In the short term, the ban creates a severe supply imbalance, exposing a vulnerability in current procurement strategies. A forecast published by Intertek CEA said that US manufacturing will likely only meet 40% of combined solar and battery storage demand through 2027.
While more than 90% of inverters installed in the United States in the last decade were imported, Wood Mackenzie reported that total domestic inverter manufacturing capacity is expected to exceed 100 GW by late 2027, driven by federal incentives. Despite this optimistic mid-term outlook, changes to hardware selection in the short term could see projects lose their grid interconnection spots, as this could be viewed as a material modification.
Overseas suppliers can seek a conditional approval from the Department of Homeland Security or Department of Defense by Jan. 1, 2028. This process requires rigorous supply chain audits, similar to those for imports subject to Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) requirements.
The FCC defines foreign hardware using the Buy American standard. This allows for potential exemptions for foreign-owned vendors that complete final assembly in US factories. Similar to previous FCC router restrictions, these waivers might be achievable, though Intertek CEA noted that past approvals included no Chinese-headquartered manufacturers.
[Updated Aug 20, 2026]: The FCC added an explicit compliance exemption for inverters that qualify for the Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit under 26 U.S.C. § 45X. Equipment meeting these domestic production credit requirements will not be classified as “foreign-produced” on the Covered List.
For compliant inverters, developers must manage financial risks associated with safe-harbored equipment that has not yet been delivered. Short-term costs are expected to rise due to inverter supply constraints, but Wood Mackenzie’s reporting indicates that increasing domestic capacity should help moderate prices by late 2027. The industry must now transition from a focus on low hardware costs toward a strategy that prioritizes national security compliance and long-term supply chain certainty.
The regulatory environment requires buyers and asset managers to scrutinize the bill of materials for every inverter. Analysts at Intertek CEA pointed out that historic equipment filings often cover internal wireless communication chips rather than whole inverter enclosures. If federal authorities apply restrictions broadly, the legal standing of many current product series could face sudden challenges.
Switching component vendors is complex, requiring updated short circuit models, new thermal calculations, and revised protection settings. Again, submitting updated engineering files to regional grid operators routinely triggers material modification clauses, which can lead to long delays and even strip a project of its position in the interconnection queue.
The sector needs to operate within two realities. Projects using pre-approved models can proceed without regulatory friction, while next-generation pipelines remain frozen.
The regulations are complex for global manufacturers that want to retain access to the US market.
Seeking a conditional exemption requires providing full transparency into corporate capitalization and ownership networks, mirroring the strict framework used under the FEOC guidelines for battery material sourcing.
Beyond corporate transparency, the introduction of the Buy American statute shifts financial accounting standards by requiring detailed direct materials cost tracking across the entire procurement footprint.
Because a single unverified sub-component from an unapproved region can invalidate an entire product line’s compliance status, several non-Chinese manufacturers are actively establishing isolated, dedicated manufacturing lines specifically designed to meet the strict component tracing rules of the US market.
Some suppliers were exploring “dumb boxes” by removing all internal wireless communication modules at the overseas factory. The responsibility for communication, data logging, and grid interactions then shifts to external systems added after import, creating a clear distinction between power conversion and system telemetry.
While this technical workaround allows developers to continue using reliable power electronics, it introduces new system risks and requires custom firmware layers along with extensive field validation.
In the residential solar sector, where simple “plug-and-play” installation is vital for profitability, the added cost and labor of installing external communication boxes could significantly reduce project margins.
For utility scale applications, centralized external controllers must manage real-time active and reactive power adjustments across hundreds of unnetworked string units, which increases operational liability if these integrated control layers fail during a grid event.
[Updated Aug 20, 2026]: The FCC explicitly closed the “dumb box” workaround. Under the August 20 revision, an inverter is subject to the ban if it contains—or is designed, equipped, or configured to accept—a remote communication component. Removing modules at the factory no longer bypasses the rule if the hardware architecture accommodates remote communication units.
The mid-term outlook for the US inverter market depends heavily on how quickly announced factory capacity can scale up. Wood Mackenzie data shows that announced domestic solar and energy storage inverter manufacturing capacity is on track to surpass 100 GW by the end of 2027.
However, setting up advanced automated electronics manufacturing facilities requires highly specialized automated surface mount technology machinery, which currently faces long global delivery times.
Intertek CEA’s research suggests that fully operational domestic manufacturing capacity may lag behind corporate announcements, indicating that domestic supply might only cover about 40% of total US solar and storage demand in the near term. This potential 60% supply gap could create intense competition among developers for compliant domestic hardware, likely driving up procurement costs across the industry and favoring large, well-capitalized development firms.
The federal government’s focus on digital vulnerabilities over physical tampering is forcing the solar industry to rapidly mature its code maintenance protocols. Developers are adopting robust software supply chain protections that mature sectors like finance, banking, and healthcare have spent years refining.
This transition is occurring as artificial intelligence radically alters threat logistics. A solar industry cybersecurity expert anonymously told pv magazine that artificial intelligence tools have compressed attack timelines: vulnerabilities that historically required weeks of manual research can now be mapped and exploited in hours or days.
To counter these automated tools, energy security frameworks must prioritize speed, complete software visibility, and the capacity to push immediate remote patches out to users. Developing end-to-end repeatability in software deployments is essential to ensure critical grid-tied operations remain protected from automated discovery and other cybersecurity threats.
The need for rapid software remediation introduces significant operational friction for PV asset managers. The FCC restrictions mandate a new administrative approval step before executing firmware updates on existing equipment lines. A standard remediation cycle must already clear several tiers of an organization, such as software developers, original equipment manufacturers, asset owners and field operators.
Adding federal approval check-gates risks creating bureaucratic bottlenecks that paralyze defensive response times, said the cybersecurity expert. Administrative delays conflict with the need to act quickly to counter cyberattacks, particularly given how AI has compressed attack timelines. To prevent widespread grid exposure, the solar industry should advocate for automated and repeatable approval processes that eliminate administrative overhead.
To navigate tighter regulations without halting product development, hardware suppliers are shifting toward localized data security architectures, said the cybersecurity expert. Top international manufacturers are onshoring software validation platforms and placing comprehensive security at local trust boundaries. Before any firmware bundle or system patch reaches an active installation site, file hashes are manually re-tested and verified by domestic cybersecurity teams.
This posture reflects a philosophical shift toward an “assumed breach” methodology, said the industry expert. Engineers no longer design equipment under the assumption that external firewalls will block all intrusions. Assuming an asset will eventually be penetrated shifts the design focus toward strict containment, continuous telemetry monitoring for abnormal signatures, and rapid system isolation to prevent a single compromised device from disrupting broader distribution grids.
The FCC’s ban on new foreign-made wireless inverters is rapidly reshaping US solar and energy storage procurement. Ultimately, the US solar industry is shifting focus from global sourcing toward national security compliance, localized control, and striving for long-term supply chain certainty.
Amendment Note (August 20, 2026): On August 20, 2026, the FCC Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau published a Public Notice clarifying and updating the Covered List restrictions enacted on July 28, 2026. The August 20 modifications:
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: [email protected].
Comments
Please login to comment
In the residential solar we have always demanded for local control, and our inverters and chargers should be looked at as appliances, external cloud based was always looked down upon…
WHAT WHAT ABOUT THE WHOLE SMART HOME INDUSTRY???? SADLY, TOO MUCH CLOUD RELIANCE….
The new issue of pv magazine Global is out now!
Available in print and digital – get your copy today!
Monday, October 26, 2026
10:30 am – 11:30 am CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Thursday, September 10, 2026
2:00 pm – 3:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
5:00 pm – 6:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
A two-day conference in Austin, Texas, bringing together leaders in US solar manufacturing, equipment specification, and factory execution.
Thursday, October 7, 2026
11:00 am – 12:30 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
pv magazine USA hosts its multi-day virtual event on U.S. solar and energy storage, covering domestic manufacturing, distributed energy and the growing role of solar-plus-storage in meeting AI-driven power demand.
You have no items in your basket.
