CNCEC’s subsidiary signs a low-margin photovoltaic EPC contract in Ghana, testing payment collection capability and project execution capacity.
According to the announcement of CNCEC, its subsidiary Sedin Engineering has signed a 300MW photovoltaic EPC contract in Ghana.
Over the past several months, Guangdong Thermal Power of China Energy Engineering Corporation has just started construction on the 50MW Tamale photovoltaic project in the Savannah Region of Ghana; the agreement for JinkoSolar to sign a 100MW Tiger Pro 3 module order with a Nigerian distributor has come into effect; the 35MWh energy storage system provided by Sungrow for the RESPITE solar-storage project in Sierra Leone has been connected to the local grid.
Four Chinese companies, three West African countries, four completely different market entry strategies. The RMB 2.58 billion deal of CNCEC is the largest among them and the closest to the traditional centralized EPC model. However, it is facing a market where the government has cut the electricity price from 18 cents to 6.5 cents, independent power producers’ arrears are still accumulating, and the gross profit margin of photovoltaic EPC has been compressed to a single-digit range.
Can an engineering company with a background in coal chemical industry and advanced chemical new materials find its own position in the low-margin photovoltaic sector in West Africa?
By the end of 2025, Ghana’s cumulative installed photovoltaic capacity reached 276.7MW, of which utility-scale capacity was only 183.1MW, lower than the previously set target of 347.5MW. The updated 2026-2030 plan sets the new ground-mounted photovoltaic target at 852MW, which will be equipped with nearly 2GWh of battery energy storage, and the private sector will undertake 41% of the utility-scale photovoltaic investment.
The 300MW single project volume of Sedin exceeds 1.6 times the existing utility-scale photovoltaic stock in Ghana. The figures on the demand side are clear, and even a little urgent.
But on the payment side opposite the demand, there is a completely different logic.
The Electricity Company of Ghana collects electricity bills in Ghanaian cedi and pays independent power producers in US dollars. Every time the cedi weakens, arrears return to the accounts receivable of independent power producers in the way of “re-accumulation”.
The Ghanaian Minister of Energy disclosed in October 2026 that the monthly payment ratio to IPPs has increased from about 40% to nearly 100%. The Minister of Finance said that the 2026 budget has allocated 345 million US dollars for energy payments, with the goal of “no new arrears accumulated for the first time”. These improvements are real, but they are also political commitments. For an EPC contract with a construction period of two to three years, the sustainability of the commitment is more worthy of attention than the intensity of the commitment.
The reason why China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation previously required full letter of credit payment in Ghana’s photovoltaic supporting equipment projects, upgrading government credit and commercial credit to bank credit, precisely shows that in this market, the reliability of cash payment is not sufficient to support the risk pricing of a long-term contract.
As the EPC contractor, Sedin does not hold the power station assets and does not directly bear the erosion of the cedi depreciation on electricity bill income.
However, the release of its progress payment and quality guarantee deposit depends on the rhythm of the owner receiving money from the power purchaser. When the cash flow of the power purchaser is squeezed by the exchange rate, the payment milestones in the EPC contract will be extended first. Low price is not the biggest problem, but the opaque payment path is.
In the first half of 2026, CNCEC signed new overseas contracts of 72.935 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 76%, and the proportion of overseas revenue rose to 35%; in the first 8 months, the new overseas contracts signed reached 79.188 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 57.46%. In emerging tracks such as photovoltaic and energy storage, the company’s expression is to “continue to make efforts”.
The most notable public track record of Sedin in the field of photovoltaic EPC is the 150MW DC project in Laos signed in 2025, with a contract value of 528 million yuan, less than half the scale of the Ghana project.
The span from 150MW to 300MW, from Southeast Asia to West Africa, from chemical plants to ground-mounted power stations is obvious.
But Sedin did not enter the market from scratch.
Within the CNCEC system, Hualu Company has long-term accumulation in the engineering of polysilicon materials. The multi-professional interface management, long-cycle equipment procurement rhythm control and overseas on-site construction organization trained by chemical EPC have a considerable proportion of reuse space in ground-mounted photovoltaic power stations.
The problem is that what is reused is engineering discipline, not profit thickness.
The reason why the gross profit margin of chemical EPC is higher than that of ordinary civil engineering is that the process complexity forms an entry barrier; the process barrier of photovoltaic EPC is much thinner, and the competitors are much denser.
The average gross profit margin of Sinoma Energy Conservation’s disclosed overseas new energy EPC projects is about 8.13%, which is achieved under the background of “fierce competition and price pressure for standardized onshore new energy projects”; the gross profit margin of clean energy engineering business is 9.10%, lower than the industry average of 10.25%.
If Sedin’s 0.86 yuan/W corresponds to a power station body with compressed boundaries, the price is not as aggressive as it seems on the surface; if it corresponds to a more complete scope of work, the profit margin will be further squeezed.
The 2.58 billion yuan Ghana project accounts for about 2.6% of CNCEC’s total new overseas contracts signed in the first three quarters of 2026, and will not change the overall profit direction alone.
But it is a verification sample: Can Sedin turn photovoltaic EPC in Ghana from a one-time “new track breakthrough” into a repeatable business category. If it can, there will be negotiation chips for the second and third projects in West Africa; if not, the 2.58 billion yuan will only be a nice-looking announcement.
Looking at the bigger picture, Sedin is not the only Chinese enterprise placing bets in West Africa, but its playstyle is clearly different when compared with several other peers.
China Energy Engineering Corporation follows the path of “centralized EPC + government framework”, binding sovereign-level or utility-level owners to win large orders and act as the general contractor. The payment risk largely depends on the owner’s credit rating and the host country’s fiscal discipline; JinkoSolar takes another path: no involvement in EPC, only selling modules and adopting distribution channels, earning profits from the manufacturing end, betting on whether West Africa’s distributed installed capacity can spread out from the concentration in South Africa; Sungrow is positioned at the equipment and system layer, not bearing the payment risk of the power purchaser, but the financing structure of the project determines whether the equipment payment can be recovered smoothly.
Sedin’s position is heavier than Sungrow’s, and lighter than China Energy Engineering’s centralized EPC.
It does not only earn profits from the manufacturing end like JinkoSolar, nor does it bind the national power company in Senegal to do a 500MW framework like China Energy Engineering. It is taking on a low-margin photovoltaic general contracting project with chemical engineering discipline in a market where electricity prices have been renegotiated and payments are being restored but not yet stable.
The success or failure of this contract will not define the overall trend of the West African photovoltaic market, but it will give a clear reference: When the unit price of centralized photovoltaic EPC is compressed to 0.86 yuan per watt, can an engineering company that crosses over from the chemical industry keep the gross profit margin near the central level of the engineering business by relying on execution efficiency and contract boundary management.
Sedin’s 2.58 billion yuan has bought a ticket to enter the African new energy EPC table.
It has already sat at the table. The heaviest chip on the table is not the quotation, but the payment calendar of the Electricity Company of Ghana and who will stand in front of the contractor when the cedi fluctuates next time.
CNCEC’s chemical industry foundation can help Sedin build the power station, but whether the money after completion can be smoothly recovered along the path from cedi to US dollar depends on whether there is a corresponding arrangement in the contract structure that can shield the contractor from exchange rate risks.
该文观点仅代表作者本人，36氪平台仅提供信息存储空间服务。
36kr Europe (eu.36kr.com) delivers global business and markets news, data, analysis, and video to the world, dedicated to building value and providing business service for companies’ global expansion.
© 2024 36kr.com. All rights reserved.

source