Solar Now

Victron Energy Demonstrates Integrated Energy Solutions at Solar & Storage Live Africa 2026 in Johannesburg  SolarQuarter
source

The cost of solar PV projects using Indian-made tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) modules fell by over 3.4% in Q4 2025, according to Mercom India Research.
Average PV equipment costs for large-scale solar projects in India showed mixed trends in the fourth quarter of 2025, Mercom said in its Q4 & Annual 2025 India Solar Market Update Report. Projects using Indian modules recorded consistent quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) declines, while systems built with Chinese tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) modules saw QoQ cost increases. 
Get Premium Subscription
Domestic content requirement (DCR)-compliant Indian TOPCon projects fell by over 3.4% during the quarter, with non-DCR TOPCon systems down nearly 3%. DCR-compliant Indian mono PERC projects declined by 2.8%, while non-DCR mono passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) configurations dropped 2.4%. 
Projects using Chinese mono PERC modules recorded a 1.3% QoQ decline, with YoY costs falling by 5.8%. In contrast, Chinese TOPCon-based projects saw a 2.7% QoQ increase, reflecting higher Chinese cell prices following reductions in VAT export rebates and rising polysilicon prices. 
Despite these steeper quarterly declines compared with some Chinese module categories, Indian module-based systems continued to operate at structurally higher overall cost levels, Mercom said. On a year-on-year (YoY) basis, DCR-compliant and non-DCR Indian mono PERC system costs declined by 2.7% and 7.9%, respectively, though the cost premium linked to domestic manufacturing and DCR compliance remained intact. 
Across technologies, system cost movements ranged from a decline of over 3.4% to an increase of 2.7% in Q4 2025. However, the overall cost hierarchy remained unchanged, with Chinese module-based systems maintaining a clear pricing advantage over Indian and DCR-compliant alternatives. 
Chinese mono PERC modules accounted for the lowest share of total system costs at 39.7%, highlighting their competitive edge driven by large-scale manufacturing and mature supply chains. By comparison, Indian TOPCon DCR-compliant modules represented the highest share at 61.9%, reflecting higher domestic production costs, limited manufacturing scale and the added premium of DCR compliance.  
TOPCon DCR-based projects were the most expensive configuration, with costs approximately 37% to 38% higher than projects using Chinese modules and marginally above mono PERC DCR deployments. 
Beyond modules, other cost components showed modest easing, the report said, with power conditioning units, primarily solar inverters, declining by 0.6% in Q4 2025 and accounting for 4.3% to 6.8% of total system costs. The marginal reduction reflects stable supply conditions and limited price volatility in inverter components. 
Mercom previously reported that India installed a record 36.6GW of solar PV in 2025, up 43% from 25GW the year before. Annual additions exceeded 30GW for the first time, lifting cumulative capacity to 136GW by December 2025. Solar accounted for 68% of all new power capacity added during the year. 

source

An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
The Photovoltaics (PV) team supports research and development projects that lower manufacturing costs, increase efficiency and performance, and improve reliability of PV technologies, in order to support the widespread deployment of electricity produced directly from sunlight (“photovoltaics”). The PV portfolio includes research directed toward reaching a levelized cost of energy of $0.03 per kilowatt-hour.
With the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of photovoltaics having decreased by roughly 90% since 2011, the PV team focuses on opportunities for even greater cost reductions to reach a LCOE of $0.03/kWh. This will allow for costs of several cents/kWh to address dispatchability and grid performance (e.g. for energy storage devices, demand side management, grid operation and planning, and advanced power electronics) while maintaining cost competitiveness.
The figure below illustrates different technology pathways to reaching the 2030 goal of $0.03/kWh for subsidy-free utility-scale solar power.
Unless noted, all scenarios above assume one-axis tracking systems with 1,860 kWh(AC)/kW(DC), five-year MACRS, 7% weighted average cost of capital (WACC), 2.5% inflation, $0.85/W system cost, $4/kW-year O&M, 0.2%/year degradation and a 50-year system lifetime.
The PV team maintains U.S. leadership in PV R&D, with a strong record of impact over the past several decades. For example, over one half of the world’s PV cell efficiency records on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s chart were supported by the PV program and its predecessors.
The projects in the portfolio currently represent roughly $179 million of investment, made over periods from two to five years. Learn about these programs and projects.
The webpages linked below provide more information about key photovoltaic technologies:
Committed to Restoring America’s Energy Dominance.
Follow Us

source

Baltimore Sun eNewspaper
Sign up for email newsletters

Sign up for email newsletters
Baltimore Sun eNewspaper
Don't miss:
Copyright 2026 Baltimore Sun. All rights reserved. The use of any content on this website for the purpose of training artificial intelligence systems, algorithms, machine learning models, text and data mining, or similar use is strictly prohibited without explicit written consent.

source

Sunview Consortium Secures RM1.96 Billion Contract for 595 MW Floating Solar Project in Malaysia  solarquarter.com
source

We use cookies to improve your experience and for marketing. Read our cookie policy or manage cookies.
Search across reports, market insights, and blog stories.
Zambia has initiated the first application window for a new results-based financing mechanism, according to a report by pv magazine. The Carbon Feed In Premium Program is aimed at large-scale solar installations that connect to the national grid.
The program is being administered by the country’s Ministry of Green Economy and Environment and Ministry of Energy. Eligible participants include both national and international independent power producers, as well as the national power utility and its subsidiaries.
This initial bidding phase seeks to procure 300 megawatts of new solar capacity. Eligible projects must have a planned installed capacity between 30 and 100 megawatts. Each project is required to incorporate an on-site battery energy storage system with a minimum capacity duration.
All power generated by supported projects must be sold to the national utility under a power purchase agreement. An online information session for the program is scheduled for mid-April. The deadline for submitting expressions of interest is the end of May.
Funding for the initiative is provided through a bilateral agreement, with payments for verified emissions reductions from the projects. Industry data indicates there is already a significant amount of operational solar capacity in the country across numerous projects.
Recent developments in the Zambian solar sector include the completion of a 100-megawatt solar farm, which is currently the nation’s largest. Plans exist to expand that site, and construction is progressing on another separate 100-megawatt solar project in a different region.
Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business
A Quick Overview of Market Performance
Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects
Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business
Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain
Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export
The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry
The Largest Import Supplying Countries
The Largest Destinations for Exports
The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.
IndexBox, Inc.
2093 Philadelphia Pike #1441
Claymont, DE 19703, USA
Contact us
© 2026 IndexBox, Inc
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.

source

Plug-in solar panels could save a typical UK household £1,100 over their 15-year lifetime, according to Carbon Brief analysis.
In response to the ongoing energy crisis, the UK government announced on 15 March a package of clean-energy measures to “boost” energy security.
Among these was the introduction of “plug-in” solar panels to the UK, which would be available “within months” at retailers, according to the government.
A cost-benefit analysis by Carbon Brief finds that plug-in solar could provide 400 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity each year, enough to meet 15% of demand for a typical household.
This could save £110 on electricity bills each year, meaning the typical upfront cost of around £500 for an 800-watt (W) system could be paid back within five years, according to the analysis.
Assuming the plug-in system has a 15-year lifespan, total net savings could reach £1,100.
Compared to rooftop solar, smaller plug-in solar systems consisting of one to two panels can be easily installed on balconies, in gardens and other outdoor spaces. They can be plugged directly into home sockets without the need for additional wiring, reducing electricity taken from the grid and thereby cutting bills.
Plug-in solar has already taken off in Germany, with official registrations already exceeding 1m installations (the actual number could be up to 4m). Other growing markets include France, Spain, the Netherlands and the US.
Panels could be available in the UK “within months” at retailers, such as Lidl and Sainsbury’s, according to the government. (Many of the products from EcoFlow, one of the main providers of plug-in solar in the UK, are already sold out online.)
The government said it will work with relevant bodies to update electrical regulations to allow the use of plug-in solar. The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) has advised homes to get their wiring checked before installing.
To assess the potential impact of plug-in solar, Carbon Brief conducted a cost-benefit analysis for an 800-watt (W) installation in a typical two-to-three bedroom home in London. The assumptions are approximate and will vary for different locations and set-ups.
Optimally placed panels – south-facing and tilted at around 40 degrees – would generate around 820 kilowatt hours (kWh) each year in London – at a “load factor” of 12% – according to the EU’s PVGIS database.
Actual output is likely to be lower, due to sub-optimal placement – such as vertically on balconies – as well as orientation and shading.
A report by trade body Solar Power Europe noted these factors could cut 30-60% from optimal output. This analysis assumes a 45% reduction from optimal output.
If a household is able to use 90% of the output – typical for such installations – then the panels would provide 400kWh of electricity each year, enough to meet 15% of typical demand.
This will vary on the household usage patterns, but running appliances such as washing machines during peak daylight hours could improve capture rates.
This could save £110 on electricity bills each year, meaning the upfront cost of around £500 could be paid back within 5 years, according to Carbon Brief’s analysis.
Assuming the panels last 15 years, total net savings over their lifetime could reach £1,100.
These savings assume a fixed unit cost of 27p/kWh, based on predictions for July 2026.
If electricity prices surged to 34p/kWh for a prolonged period – as they did during the 2022 gas price crisis – then annual savings could increase to around £140, further reducing the payback time.
If module costs fall over time as more suppliers enter the market, this could reduce the upfront cost and payback time.
If 3m households take up plug-in solar – comparable to Germany’s current deployment – this would generate 1.2 terawatt hours (TWh), less than 1% of UK demand.
While this would not significantly cut UK emissions overall, it could still save the households more than £330m in total and avoid around two tankers’ worth of imported liquified natural gas (LNG) each year, according to Carbon Brief’s analysis.
Aside from its economic benefits, plug-in solar could unlock participation in the clean-energy transition for a wider percentage of the population.
For example, renters make up around one-third of UK households and lack control over the installation of rooftop solar and heat pumps. Plug-in solar would enable them to engage in and benefit from clean energy in their homes.
Analysis: Record wind and solar saved UK from gas imports worth £1bn in March 2026
Renewables
02.04.26
Chris Stark: The economics of clean energy ‘just get better and better’
Interviews
17.02.26
Analysis: China’s CO2 emissions have now been ‘flat or falling’ for 21 months
China energy
12.02.26
Q&A: New UK onshore wind and solar is ‘50% cheaper’ than new gas
Renewables
11.02.26
Expert analysis direct to your inbox.
Get a round-up of all the important articles and papers selected by Carbon Brief by email. Find out more about our newsletters here.
Get a round-up of all the important articles and papers selected by Carbon Brief by email. Find out more about our newsletters here.
Published under a CC license. You are welcome to reproduce unadapted material in full for non-commercial use, credited ‘Carbon Brief’ with a link to the article. Please contact us for commercial use.

source

The  battery system uses lithium-ion technology across more than 700 containers. Its power capacity is 1,126 megawatts, with an energy capacity of 3,530 megawatt-hours, enough to sustain that output for roughly three hours. The Adani Group announced the project on November 11, 2025, The company has not disclosed the total investment amount. As of April 1, 2026, Adani had brought 1,376 megawatt-hours of capacity online at Khavda. But no updated completion date for the remaining capacity has been publicly stated.
Solar and wind fluctuate with weather and time of day. India’s grid needs power when the sun goes down and demand peaks.This battery absorbs excess daytime generation and discharges it in the evening, reducing reliance on fossil fuel plants. Adani says it will also ease transmission congestion and reduce curtailment when grids waste renewable power they can’t handle.
“Energy storage is the cornerstone of a renewable-powered future,” Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani said in the November announcement. “With this historic project, we are not only setting global benchmarks but also reinforcing our commitment to India’s energy independence and sustainability.”
Adani’s roadmap extends beyond this installation. The group plans to deploy an additional 15 gigawatt-hours of storage by March 2027. Its five year target is 50 gigawatt-hours total. For context, India’s Central Electricity Authority projects the country will need roughly 34 gigawatt-hours of battery storage capacity by 2026-27, rising to 236 gigawatt-hours by 2031-32. As of April 2025, only around 0.5 gigawatt-hours of battery storage had been commissioned across India, according to the India Energy Storage Alliance.
The Khavda park is already operating at scale. Adani Green Energy added more than 5 gigawatts of new renewable capacity in fiscal year 2025-26, the highest greenfield annual expansion by any company outside China. This brings its total operational portfolio to 19.3 gigawatts. Cumulative installed capacity at Khavda has reached 9.4 gigawatts of the 30 gigawatt target planned for 2029. The park spans 538 square kilometers, an area five times the size of Paris.
India has committed to reaching 500 gigawatts of non-fossil energy capacity by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2070. Storage determines whether intermittent generation can function as baseload power. The Khavda battery doesn’t just store electricity; it tests whether a project of this ambition can be built and operated at the pace India’s energy transition requires.

source

How a ‘perfectly symmetrical’ 2D perovskite could boost tandem solar cells  Tech Xplore
source

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission. Why trust us?
The Bluetti 60W folding solar panel is a clever, heavy-duty charging companion for hikers, camping and biking
Removed from bookmarks
Heading off-grid on a multi-day hike or cycling trip usually involves some strategic battery management, While a heavy power bank is the usual safety net, a reliable portable solar panel allows you to generate your own free electricity on the move (so long as the weather cooperates).
The market is awash with portable solar chargers, ranging from flimsy dashboard toys to massive, rigid arrays designed to power a motorhome. The Bluetti 60W solar panel aims for the middle ground. It’s a 60W folding panel built with portability in mind, stripping away the bulky kickstands found on heavier camping panels in favour of a design that you can comfortably strap to your back or chuck in a crowded car boot.
It’s competitively priced too, costing around £99. I’ve been carrying Bluetti’s foldable panel out into the wild, propping it up against rucksacks and chasing the sunshine to see if the compact power plant is worth your money.
Read more: Best solar chargers, tried and tested
To see how the Bluetti 60W solar panel performs in the real world, I took it on a camping trip to Somerset. Admittedly the site had mains power, but I endeavoured to keep my kit charged using nothing but precious photons. I’ve added more detail about my testing at the end of this review.
Read more: Lidl to sell £400 plug-in solar panels – here’s everything you need to know
The immediate appeal of the Bluetti 60W solar panel is the form factor. Using a clever eight-fold design, the entire 90cm array collapses down into an impressively neat little square with a handle, roughly the footprint of a sheet of A4 paper. At 1.4kg, it has a reassuring heft to it without feeling like a burden in a backpack.
Bluetti has built this thing to survive the outdoors. The monocrystalline silicon panels are laminated with ETFE (ethylene tetrafluoroethylene), a highly durable, weatherproof polymer that resists scratches and shrugs off water. I happily laid it down in the damp dirt and chucked it into the boot of my car without much thought. It feels more robust than the fabric-heavy panels you often find at this price point.
To keep things foldable and slim, Bluetti has left out the kickstand. Solar panels need a direct, perpendicular line of sight to the sun to hit peak efficiency, which is hard to achieve without a set of adjustable legs. But in practice it wasn’t much of an issue. The folding design is flexible enough that you can easily prop it up against a rucksack or a tent to catch the afternoon rays.
It also features reinforced metal eyelets along the edges, a tough carrying handle and a secure button clip, giving you plenty of options to use the included carabiners to drape the panel over your backpack or your bike, soaking up the sun while you walk or ride.
If dialling in the perfect 45-degree angle to maximise every last watt is important, you might be better served by a heavier EcoFlow or Jackery panel (both of which I’ve tested and liked). But for throw-it-in-a-bag portability, the Bluetti 60W solar panel makes the right compromise. The USB-C port maxes out at half the panel’s rated wattage anyway, which still gives you plenty of headroom.
The Bluetti 60W solar panel is rated for 60W of power under perfect lab conditions. In the real world, at the height of summer, I managed to pull a respectable 50-55W of output through the DC5521 port and a consistent 30W fast-charging from the USB-C.
A quick glance at the spec sheet explains why the panel performs so reliably. With an operating voltage of 23.1V, the panel pushes a relatively high electrical pressure for a 60W panel. This means that when a cloud rolls over and the output inevitably drops into the teens, the panel maintains enough voltage to keep your devices sipping power, rather than repeatedly cutting in and out. The higher voltage also means the panel doesn’t cope well with partial shading, so keep an eye out for rogue shadows.
Connectivity is where the Bluetti 60W shows its versatility. Tucked away in a zipped pouch are three DC ports that can be used simultaneously. The first is a standard 12V-24V DC barrel (DC5521), which achieves the 60W output on the box and can be used to charge a power station. There’s also a USB-C port (PD30W, up to 20V-1.5A) for fast charging phones, and a USB-A port (18W, up to 12V-1.5A).
If you’re hiking or biking and want to top up your devices during a lunch stop, you can plug your phone or tablet directly into the USB ports. Under sunny conditions I recorded fast-charging speeds equivalent to a solid 30W wall charger, which is more than enough to resurrect a dead smartphone in a hurry. Alternatively, if you’re car camping, you can use the included DC cable to hook the panel up to a portable power station during the day for running three-pin electronics at night. I tested it alongside Bluetti’s own AC50B battery (£299, Bluettipower.co.uk), which saw its 448Wh capacity replenished by 25 to 35 per cent over the course of a sunny day.
The Bluetti 60W solar panel is the most versatile portable solar panel I’ve tested, with an eight-fold design that shrinks down to the size of a sheet of paper while remaining rugged and high-performing.
It’s tough enough to withstand being thrown around a campsite, and the ability to charge a DC, USB-C and USB-A device simultaneously means you don’t need to haul around a separate, heavy power station to make use of it. If portability is your main concern for your next off-grid adventure, it’s a superb choice.
To see if the Bluetti PV60F could handle life on the trail, I packed it up and took it out into the elements (my balcony, the local park and a camping trip in Somerset), using it as my primary source of backup power for several days.
As IndyBest’s tech critic, Steve Hogarty has spent more than a decade testing and reviewing the latest gadgets, from premium smartphones to off-grid power solutions. By taking devices out of the testing lab and deploying them in the muddy, unpredictable reality of the outdoors, he ensures his recommendations are always honest, unbiased, and grounded in practical experience.
Read more: Best power banks to charge devices on the go, tested on iPhone, Android and more
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

source

Mostly cloudy skies. A stray shower or thunderstorm is possible. High 77F. Winds SSW at 10 to 20 mph..
Periods of rain. Low near 40F. Winds WSW at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 100%. Rainfall around a half an inch.
Updated: April 4, 2026 @ 11:16 am
Ed Sekerak, standing at left center, offers testimony regarding property values in the area surrounding the proposed Solar Flats project. The hearing Thursday lasted over four hours.

Ed Sekerak, standing at left center, offers testimony regarding property values in the area surrounding the proposed Solar Flats project. The hearing Thursday lasted over four hours.
Corry City Council convened a public conditional use hearing Thursday on a proposal by Solar Flats LLC to construct a 3-megawatt AC solar energy facility on approximately 16 acres of land along South Shady Avenue, owned by Troyer Growers Inc. The session drew a crowd of about 45, and featured hours of technical testimony, legal argument and public comment from residents who live within sight of the proposed installation.
Mayor Jeff Fike presided, joined by Councilmen William “Buzz” Hammond and William Roche and Councilwoman Charles “Chuck” Gray. Councilman Andrew Sproveri recused himself, citing concern over potential bias.
At the close of testimony, Council adjourned to executive session and announced it would reconvene at a later date to render a formal decision.
The project
Annika Schiffer-Delagard, project development associate for Greenwood Sustainable Infrastructure, described Solar Flats as a relatively modest commercial solar installation designed to feed power directly into the grid through Penelec. She said the project would have the capacity to power between 300 and 400 homes.
Schiffer-Delagard outlined what she characterized as the project’s low environmental footprint: no lighting, no signage, no smoke, no odor. She said maintenance would require only approximately three truck visits per year. She added that the panels themselves are silicon and glass, are UL-certified and pose no leaching risk to soil or groundwater.
Schiffer-Delagard said the company contracted for noise and glare studies ahead of the application. A noise analysis found all operational sound would fall at or below 45 decibels, comparable to a household dishwasher, and below ambient levels. A glint-and-glare study, performed by Fisher Associates engineer Steve Mellott, found minimal “green glare” — the lowest category, likened to sunlight reflecting off snow or a pond — at two locations, the first totaling 47 minutes of exposure annually, occurring in spring and fall near an agricultural barn at 340 Sample Flats Road; the second at the residence of Dr. Kurt Lund, totaling 16 minutes per year between May and June.
The project will include tracker panels — motors that rotate the arrays to remain perpendicular to the sun — powered by electricity generated by the project itself. Mellott testified the site plans include erosion and sediment controls, post-construction stormwater management and vegetative screening on three of four sides of the property. The north side, he said, is already bordered by existing woods.
Greenwood representative Drew Rogerson told Council that a 100-foot setback from residences is included and that the company maintains a 24/7 operations-and-maintenance team to respond to any damage, such as panels broken by hail. He also addressed concerns about site selection, assuring the audience that Corry was chosen because a willing landowner came forward and the utility interconnection proved feasible — not because the company believed the community would offer little resistance.
Legal arguments over zoning classification
Attorney Kevin Barley of Steptoe and Johnson in Pittsburgh, representing Solar Flats LLC and Greenwood Sustainable Infrastructure, argued that the application was filed at the city’s own direction. He said the city’s interim zoning officer, Samantha Vollentine, consulted with City Solicitor Lydia Caporosa in spring 2025 and instructed Solar Flats to apply under the “special residential and commercial projects” conditional use category in the R-1 single family residential district.
Barley reminded Council that a conditional use is presumed by the legislature to be consistent with the zoning plan and not inherently adverse to the public interest. He said the hearing was not about whether residents or officials favor or oppose solar energy, but whether the applicant meets the conditions set forth in the ordinance. He also noted that under the existing R-1 ordinance, uses with far greater potential impact — including mineral extraction, cemeteries, hospitals, nursing homes and funeral homes — are already permitted by right or conditional use.
Attorney Edward Betza of Elderkin Law Firm in Erie, representing objecting resident Kelly Goodsel and other South Shady Avenue neighbors by extension, offered a sharply different reading of the ordinance. He argued that the city’s zoning code, adopted in 1991 and never updated to address solar development, contains three distinct use categories: “planned commercial project,” “industrial use,” and “special residential and commercial project.”
Betza contended that a solar energy facility is plainly a planned commercial project, a category permitted only in I-1 and I-2 industrial districts, not R-1, or possibly an industrial use, which is similarly barred from the residential zone. Betza argued that the “special residential and commercial project” category requires both a residential and a commercial component, and that Solar Flats, having no residential element whatsoever, cannot legitimately claim that classification. 
“The word ‘and’ is significant,” he told Council. “I didn’t write it.”
Beyond the classification dispute, Betza argued that the applicant failed to meet its burden of proof under Section 605 of the zoning ordinance, pointing out that the testimony addressed neither fire protection nor electrical distribution disturbance, both required criteria. He also cited the ordinance’s provision that reflective materials or lighting “which produce objectionable, direct or reflected glare on adjoining properties shall not be permitted,” arguing the standard is absolute. 
“It says none — zero. Shall not be permitted,” Betza said.
Property values and decommissioning
Columbus resident Edward Sekerak, a state-certified general real estate appraiser who testified he has completed more than 10,000 appraisals over his career, said he found no evidence in available studies that a solar project of Solar Flats’ size and location would have a measurable negative effect on surrounding property values. He cited research from Virginia Tech and other institutions. Under cross-examination, however, Sekirak acknowledged he had not read the cited studies in their entirety.
On decommissioning, Schiffer-Delagard said the project’s anticipated operational life is 25 to 30 years. She said Solar Flats plans to secure a surety bond covering 110% of estimated decommissioning costs, calculated using 2026 pricing and an inflation rate. 
When asked by Councilwoman Gray whether the panels might simply be replaced and the facility continued beyond that horizon, Schiffer-Delagard said she could not commit to that scenario. 
When Mayor Fike asked how many sites Greenwood has decommissioned to date, she replied, “Zero.”
Public comment
Ten members of the public addressed Council, the large majority in opposition. Kelly Goodsel, whose property abuts the proposed installation, organized his objections into three categories: environmental concerns, including potential stormwater runoff into a nearby spring and existing wetlands to the north; property and home value impacts; and legal and ordinance compliance questions.
Goodsel also noted that property owners along Stewart Road in Concord Township, whose land would be directly affected by the project, received none of the informational mailings Greenwood sent to Shady Avenue residents in October 2025, and therefore had no advance notice of the proceedings. He said a portion of his own 20-acre property lies in Concord Township.
Lund echoed Goodsel’s testimony and raised additional concerns about glare hazards for motorists traveling roads near the project.
One speaker broke from the majority. Ed Spitman, who said he has lived near the area for 66 years, argued that the landowner has a right to use his property as he sees fit. 
“Everybody wants to make money, so everybody’s got to sacrifice a little bit,” Spitman said. “You’ve got to be open-minded to everybody.”
Planning commission previously split
The Corry Planning Commission previously voted 3–2 against recommending approval of the conditional use application, leaving the final determination to City Council. See the March 6 edition of The Journal for more information. 
Council has not announced a date for its decision.
Your comment has been submitted.

Reported
There was a problem reporting this.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
Sorry, there are no recent results for popular videos.
Sorry, there are no recent results for popular commented articles.
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Would you like to receive our daily news? Sign up today! 
Your browser is out of date and potentially vulnerable to security risks.
We recommend switching to one of the following browsers:

source

Many countries and regions are gradually facing a situation where early-installed photovoltaic modules are reaching the end of their service life; this establishes a solid market foundation for the establishment of solar module recycling plant. For enterprises planning to invest in the solar module recycling sector, selecting suitable country in which to site a facility is a critical factor for project success.
Based on the scale of the solar PV market and the associated recycling demand, the following countries are particularly worthy of consideration. These countries possess substantial installed solar capacity or rapidly growing industries, providing a stable supply of raw materials and market demand for the establishment of solar module recycling plants.
Europe
Many European countries were early adopters of photovoltaic (PV) technology and possess a substantial installed base; consequently, they are poised to gradually enter a peak phase for solar module decommissioning over the coming years. The European Union features a well-developed regulatory framework for waste management—including explicit requirements for e-waste recycling—which provides a solid policy foundation for the establishment of solar module recycling plant.
Countries such as Germany, Spain, and Italy—which rank among the leaders in PV installed capacity and possess mature supporting industrial ecosystems—are particularly well-suited locations for siting solar module recycling projects.
China
China stands as the world’s largest producer and installer of solar PV systems, boasting a cumulative installed capacity exceeding 500 GW. This signifies that a massive volume of end-of-life solar panels will be generated in the coming years, making the establishment of recycling facilities an effective means of processing discarded solar modules locally. Concurrently, relevant government authorities have recently begun actively promoting the development of standards and pilot programs specifically dedicated to solar panel recycling.
Selecting China as the location for solar module recycling plant allows for the full leveraging of local supply chain advantages, thereby ensuring the highly efficient operation of the recycling process.
United States
The U.S. solar market continues to grow, bolstered by strong support for renewable energy across various states. Some states have already begun to address the issue of end-of-life PV modules and are advancing relevant legislation. For instance, federal and state-level policies—such as the “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act”—provide financial support for recycling initiatives.
Establishing solar module recycling plant within the United States helps ensure compliance with domestic environmental regulations, offers manufacturers localized recycling services, and reduces transportation costs.
India
India’s installed solar capacity is climbing rapidly, having already surpassed 50 GW, with a government target of reaching 450 GW by 2030. This trajectory will generate a massive demand for recycling services.
Although India is an emerging market for photovoltaics—and its recycling infrastructure is currently still under development—proactively establishing solar panel recycling facilities will enable the country to meet future market demands while simultaneously fostering job creation and local technological advancement.
Australia
 
Australia boasts a high rate of solar energy adoption, alongside a steady increase in utility-scale ground-mounted solar projects. The government is actively promoting renewable energy recycling initiatives—such as the Solar Recycling Fund—which offer incentives for the construction of new recycling plants.
Setting up solar panel recycling plants in the vicinity of Australia‘s major cities or industrial zones would enable coverage of both local markets and select markets within the Pacific region.
These countries hold significant potential for solar panels recycling, as their market scale and policy environments are conducive to supporting the long-term operation of solar panel recycling plant. Naturally, specific investment decisions should be made in conjunction with local regulations and economic assessments. If you are considering investing in solar panel recycling plant in the aforementioned countries or other regions, we invite you to consult with the professional manufacturer of solar PV panel recycling machine: Henan DOING Company.
DOING Company’s solar panel recycling plants offer complete recycling production lines, encompassing dismantling, crushing, and sorting equipment. Utilizing the automated crushing and sorting system, our technology separates high-purity valuable materials—such as glass, silicon, aluminum, and copper—from discarded solar modules. With an extraction rate exceeding 98%, our solutions help recycling facilities minimize operational costs while ensuring compliance with international environmental standards.
Whether you plan to establish solar module recycling plant in Germany, Spain, Italy, China, the United States, India, or any other country, our equipment can be tailored to meet local requirements, and we are ready to provide customized recycling solutions to suit your specific needs.
Environmental XPRT is a global environmental industry marketplace and information resource. Online product catalogs, news, articles, events, publications & more.
Channels
Solutions
Latest
Publications
Companies

source

OPINION: The UK government has finally opened the doors to plug-in solar panels in the UK, saying that they’ll be available in shops ‘within months’. Self-installed, and just requiring a simple 13A plug socket, will plug-in solar start a revolution and will the savings stack up?
As of April 1, the price cap has come down, and electricity and gas bills have just got a bit cheaper. Well, until you look at what’s going on in the Middle East and know that this reduction in price is a false dawn, and, unless things change dramatically, energy prices could soar upwards. 
No wonder, then, that the demand for solar power has risen dramatically. As I learned from my BOXT Solar review, solar panels are well worth it in the UK, provided you have the right conditions: the right type of roof, facing the right way, and you’re planning to stay in the home that you own for long enough to see the benefits.
That leaves an awful lot of people who aren’t in the optimal situation, including those in flats, those who rent and those who are only going to stay in a place temporarily. It’s for these kinds of people that plug-in solar offers a lifeline.
With a fixed solar installation, the idea is to fit as many solar panels as possible onto your roof to generate as much electricity as possible. To use this DC current, you need a high-power solar inverter, which converts the incoming power into the AC power you use around your home. All this specialised equipment costs a fair amount, and then there’s professional installation on top of that.
Plug-in solar aims to make life easier, with self-install solar panels that you can hang over a balcony, put on a shed roof or even place in a small terrace or other outdoor space.
These then connect to a microinverter, which plugs into a standard three-pin socket, with no additional installation required. Under the new government legislation, systems that generate up to 800W can be plugged in without needing an electrician. 
The size of the system you buy and the types of fixing the solar panels buy all make a difference to the price. As you can’t buy many such systems yet, there’s not much to go on, but we do have some initial reports on the types of systems that will be available, and there’s European pricing, as plug-in solar is already available in a lot of other countries.
Initial reports suggest that plug-in solar systems will cost around the £400 mark, but smaller systems could be available at around £200, with the largest system with a battery maxing out at over £ 1000.
Savings depend on the size of system you have and other factors. Most importantly, you still need to have an area suitable for solar panels: south-facing is ideal, with as much sun exposure as possible throughout the day. Essentially, you need direct sunlight; if you have a north-facing balcony, for example, or there’s a lot of shade where you want to put your plug-in system, you won’t generate a lot of power.
With those kinds of variables, typical energy savings could be from £70 a year, although EcoFlow says that you can save up to £115 per year with its STREAM Microinverter. This system is currently offered as a package with two 450W solar panels and a STREAM AC Pro battery (1.92kWh capacity) for £1049, marking a nine-year payback period (note that the current package requires an electrician to install, due to current legislation). 
As we get more packages and I’m able to run some reviews, it will be possible to get a better idea of what these kinds of systems can do. The short version is that plug-in solar can’t generate the same kinds of power as rooftop panels, but you’ll still generate free power that will knock your electricity bills down.
It will be worth doing some sums to work out whether it’s worth buying a battery, too. As with a full rooftop solar, whether a battery is worth it will depend on how much power you generate and whether you can use it while it’s being generated or not. This is the kind of information I plan to cover in reviews once samples are available.
Provided you have the right place to mount panels, plug-in solar is a simple way to get started with free electricity generation, and with prices looking like they’re going up, any saving is good.
Starting life on the consumer PC press back in 1998, David has been at the forefront of technology for the past 20 years. He has edited Computer Shopper and Expert Reviews, and once wrote a book on how to build a PC, before moving to Trusted Reviews in 2018 to take over the growing Home Technology section. He covers all home appliances, smart home and kitchen gadgets. With a cupboard full of hubs, David is a keen smart home enthusiast with a house that’s controlled via Alexa (which needs only occasionally to be shouted at when something’s not quite working). A keen cook and a self-professed coffee snob, David’s keen to expand his section’s coverage and bring the best cooking and cleaning kit to Trusted Reviews. You can find David online mostly tweeting about kittens, which he regularly fosters for a local charity.
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

source

Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source
In the middle of a five-day power outage brought on by an early spring storm, Woody Gontina’s house appeared to be the only one on his street that still had its lights on.
At the time, Gontina had just installed a 5.4-kilowatt solar-and-battery-storage system at his home.
“Because of the solar and the battery, we had our whole house powered day and night throughout that outage,” recalls Gontina.
While Gontina could not have foreseen the storm’s impact, it was an early proof of concept for the Royal Oak city commissioner, who was in the early stages of encouraging his neighbors to install solar panels on their properties through an initiative called Solarize Royal Oak.
In the past few years, a largely grassroots solar installation trend has taken shape across a handful of Michigan towns and counties, as residents like Gontina have sought to capitalize on group-buy discounts and federal incentives to upgrade their homes.
“There wasn’t really a champion to push (Solarize) forward,” said Gontina. “I had the time and the interest to do it, and I also understood that the city was very challenged in terms of resources and didn’t have the time to meet an initiative like that.”
Related:
Now overseen by the Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association, the Solarize program has expanded to Grand Rapids, Lansing, Kalamazoo, as well as Oakland, Washtenaw, and Wayne counties, where city and county officials have taken over administering it to homeowners and businesses.
While federal incentives for solar have shrunk and solar installations have declined under the Trump administration, advocates of Solarize are still encouraging residents and businesses to take advantage of remaining opportunities and to embrace renewable energy sources amid utility rate hikes.
“As we see our energy costs continuing to rise, that’s really the biggest argument for renewables,” said Gontina. “Our electric provider, DTE, has demonstrated that they will not stop continuing to ask for increases at a regular pace until there’s something legislatively done to stop that.”
While Solarize has found its footing in Michigan in the past decade, its origins trace back to 2009, when residents in Portland, Or. began hosting neighborhood seminars with local contractors to learn about residential solar panel installation. The program rapidly expanded the city’s solar footprint, according to a report from the Energy Trust of Oregon.
For Ann Arbor energy manager and resident Julie Roth — who now works for the city’s Office of Sustainability & Innovation — hearing about the early success of Solarize was enough of a rationale to try it in her neighborhood in 2019. At the time, she was interested in installing solar panels on her roof but was concerned about the high upfront costs and the wide range of contractor quotes.
“I pitched it to my solar installer (contractor),” said Roth. “I said, ‘Well, what do you think if I get a bunch of people here and we all do it together. Would you give us a discount?’ He said, ‘Sure,’ and came up with a sort of discount structure.”
After she sent out an invite on Nextdoor and Facebook, Roth says, she was surprised at the turnout.
“I thought that I would have three people sitting around my dining room table awkwardly trying not to make eye contact with the installer or me, and then we would all go home, and it would be over,” said Roth.
Instead, 40 people showed up to that first meeting at her house. Within a year, about a dozen people from that night installed solar panel systems on their homes.
“It basically started because we were trying to overcome barriers to adoption,” she said. “We didn’t have any staff. It started as a volunteer thing. We didn’t have any money, and so with no resources and very little bandwidth, what can you do?”
As residents like Gontina and Roth have become ambassadors for Solarize, encouraging neighbors to host their own events and create more group-buy discounts on solar, it’s brought greater interest from county governments and statewide organizations seeking to broaden its appeal.
“We really want to position ourselves as a resource, as an advocate, and relationship builder,” said Julie Lyons Bricker, chief sustainability officer for Oakland County, one of the latest counties to adopt the Solarize program.
Since launching in 2021, the county’s Sustainability Office has focused on both improving energy efficiency across Oakland’s 62 cities, townships, and villages and guiding homeowners and businesses toward available incentives, says Lyons Bricker.
With Solarize Oakland County, the county hopes to raise awareness on how solar works, what’s needed to get it installed, and what people should expect from their contractors. Groups of residents can be matched with GLREA-approved vendors and receive a bulk discount of 5 to 15% on their solar panel purchases.
As momentum for solar installations has picked up in some communities across Michigan, the national solar industry has had to contend with tariff pressures and a freeze on approvals for major infrastructure projects, amid a pivot away from the clean energy policies and investments that emerged during the Biden administration.
Solar installations have declined, leading to an industry-wide disruption, with utility-scale solar installations down 16% and community solar down 25% in 2025, according to a recent report from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).
Last year, the Residential Clean Energy Credit — a 30% federal tax credit on solar, wind, and geothermal home installations — was cut six years short when Trump signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill” in July 2025, ending a credit that had been set to run through 2032.
“It’s an economic investment when you’re thinking about installing a system,” said Gontina. “Anything that is available to help with that investment only makes it easier.”
While the residential tax credit ended in December, multiple financial incentives for businesses and houses of worship remain active through the end of 2027. Bricker says the county is still trying to encourage commercial property owners to take advantage of that opportunity while it lasts.
For renters, lower-income residents, and those with roofs unsuitable for panels, rooftop solar programs like Solarize remain largely out of reach. The Trump administration’s termination of the federal Solar for All program in 2025 eliminated $156 million in Michigan projects designed to expand solar access for low-income households — projects already underway in Detroit, Highland Park, Benton Harbor, and beyond.
Community solar legislation, which would allow residents to subscribe to off-site solar arrays and receive bill credits without owning a system, has bipartisan support in Michigan but has yet to advance.
Gontina says that the Solarize Oakland County program could help the rest of the county catch up to what individual towns like Royal Oak are attempting to do.
“You’re bringing a bigger tent to the picture so that more people feel like they have an opportunity to be included,” he said.
Although Solarize is transitioning toward a “top-down” approach, Roth credits the “grassroots” solar parties she and others hosted with helping grow the city’s residential solar installations over the last several years.
“It grows the movement more when you’re talking to your neighbors than when you’re just talking to a city representative,” said Roth. “The community engagement and buy-in and ownership are much higher, especially when you’re not just looking at getting solar up, you’re looking at engaging a community around energy.”
She added: “We’re there as technical experts to some degree, to add legitimacy, and to continue to bring people along, and to make sure that the installers are being responsive.”
Although Ann Arbor Solarize’s numbers have slowed down in recent years, city data shows that the number of residents installing solar panels has increased in tandem with the program’s launch in 2019 and the growth of the solar installation market.
Ann Arbor has averaged about 180 residential solar installations annually since 2020, compared to 17 per year between 2008 and 2019.
Nearly seven years later, the success of Ann Arbor’s Solarize program has contributed, in part, to the city’s push to create a municipal-owned utility designed to help residents and businesses access solar energy and battery storage without upfront costs. The program will be optional, and will supplement, not replace, the use of DTE’s electric grid, according to city documents.
Ann Arbor’s Sustainable Energy Utility, authorized by roughly 80% of voters, is designed in part to address those barriers. Unlike rooftop solar programs, it would allow residents and businesses to access solar and battery storage without upfront costs — with the city owning the equipment and customers paying a monthly rate. Pilot projects targeting lower-income neighborhoods are expected to launch in 2026, with citywide expansion planned for 2027.
Roth hopes the city’s trend in renewable energy adoption and utility ownership can be a model for other communities. These days, she relishes the sight of solar panels around Ann Arbor.
“You walk around, you walk your dog in the neighborhoods, and it’s like, ‘solar there, solar there, solar there,’” she said. “It’s so visible. And that’s really exciting to see the actual physical changes in your community.”
___
This story was originally published by Planet Detroit and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Journalism like this doesn’t happen without community support. Your contribution powers reporting that listens to Michigan residents and holds leaders accountable.
Join 8,000+ members building accountability journalism that serves communities, not special interests.

Thank you to our Michigan Environment Watch sponsors
Bridge Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from our sponsors. Sponsorship supports our independent journalism mission but does not constitute sponsor endorsement of individual articles or editorial content. Bridge Michigan journalism remains fact- and data-driven and independent at all times.
Please visit the About page for more information and to subscribe to Environment Watch. Interested in becoming a sponsor? Contact Emma Carr.
Republish This Story

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under our Republication Guidelines. Questions? Email republishing@bridgemi.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
by Ethan Bakuli, Plant Detroit, Bridge Michigan
April 2, 2026
Only donate if we’ve informed you about important Michigan issues
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we’ll feature your quote next time!
Link Copy link
Click “No, thanks” if you do not want to be counted in our site traffic.

source

Australian scientists swapped solar panels for plastic mirrors and heated them to 754°F — Then something unexpected happened  Energies Media
source

Romain Zissler, Senior Researcher, Renewable Energy Institute
2 February 2026
in Japanese
In Japan, solar photovoltaic (PV) is sometimes unfairly criticized because it is perceived as a technology imported from China – a country with which diplomatic relations are strained. China’s dominance over the global solar PV supply chain is undeniably strong and undesirable. However, pragmatic energy policies should move beyond this simplistic view. Solar PV undoubtedly strengthens Japan’s energy security and economy. In 2024, Japanese manufacturers accounted for 34% of domestic shipments of solar PV modules (including their overseas production). In 2025, 78% of module imports came from China, but India’s emergence as one of the world’s new leaders in module manufacturing offers untapped diversification potential. Domestic production can be increased through the implementation of appropriate support mechanisms. Module recycling reduces the need for additional imports. Finally, solar PV is the most cost competitive electricity generation technology in Japan, and the majority of its economic value is extracted within the country.
According to the Japan Photovoltaic Energy Association (JPEA), in 2024, over one-third of the solar PV modules shipped to Japan were manufactured by Japanese companies [Figure 1].
Most of the production of Japanese companies took place abroad. The JPEA does not specify the countries involved, but additional data from BloombergNEF indicates that it is China.
Given that the factories located abroad are owned by Japanese companies, it cannot be claimed that Japan is excessively dependent on foreign companies to meet its domestic demand.
Figure 1: Domestic Shipments of Solar PV Modules – Japan, 2024
According to the Japanese Ministry of Finance (MoF), in value terms, imports of modules into Japan came essentially from China (78% in 2025) – including overseas production by Japanese companies – and Southeast Asia (i.e., the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand) (20%) [Figure 2].
On the positive side, Japan can diversify its import portfolio, as India is the world’s second-largest supplier of modules on a manufacturing capacity basis, and Japanese imports of Indian modules have been negligible so far (0.001%).
The main export market for Indian modules is the United States. However, since the end of August 2025, Indian modules have been subject to import tariffs of 64% in the United States.¹ This measure is forcing Indian manufacturers (e.g., Waaree Energies, Tata Power Solar Systems, Adani Enterprises…) to diversify their customer base. Increasing the trade of modules between India and Japan could be beneficial for both countries.
Figure 2: Country of Origin of Solar PV Module Imports – Japan, 2025

According to BloombergNEF, one of the challenges is that Japanese manufacturers now only produce cells and modules (i.e., they no longer produce polysilicon, ingots or wafers) [Figure 3]. Consequently, they currently have no control over events occurring upstream in the supply chain.
Figure 3: Solar PV Manufacturing Capacity of Japanese Companies by Segment – 2025
This situation is regrettable, but not irreversible. Japanese companies demonstrated their technological expertise in manufacturing polysilicon and wafers in Japan until 2022, when the last factories were still operating before closing due to fierce global economic competition.
If the Japanese government deemed these segments strategic, incentives (e.g., grants, tax credits…) could be offered to stimulate production by Japanese companies and/or encourage foreign companies to establish themselves in Japan.
For example, in the United States, thanks to a 25% investment tax credit, domestic production of ingots and wafers was revived in 2025.² This incentive enabled the American company Corning to build a new ingot and wafer factory (manufacturing capacity of 2 GW/year each) in the state of Michigan.
Importing solar PV modules is a one-time transaction, unlike importing fossil fuels, which is necessarily recurring. Once installed, modules generate electricity until the end of their lifespan (i.e., up to 30 years). Conversely, without a continuous inflow of fuel, coal and gas-fired power plants cannot generate electricity. This is why even imported modules contribute to Japan’s energy security.
Furthermore, while it is possible to recycle solar PV modules, recycling fossil fuels is impossible.
When solar PV modules are imported, raw materials that are not necessarily produced locally are also indirectly imported. In Japan, the mining of copper and bauxite (the base of aluminum) ore is very limited. However, refined copper and aluminum – two valuable metals – are easily recovered during module recycling (e.g., from the cables, junction box and frame).³
According to the International Energy Agency-Photovoltaic Power Systems Program (IEA-PVPS), a collaborative R&D initiative, some Japanese companies can properly recycle modules. Hamada Corporation is a good example.
Hamada Corporation owns a solar PV recycling center in Kyoto, in the Kansai region. This facility can process 21.6 tons of module waste per day. Mechanical treatments are implemented (i.e., “hot knife” for unbroken modules and “hammering” for broken-glass modules) to recover materials such as glass, metals and polymers [Figure 4]. These recovered materials are used by glass manufacturers and refining companies.
Figure 4: Simplified Illustration of Hamada Corporation’s Solar PV Module Recycling Process
Closed-loop recycling of solar PV modules involves recovering all the materials from old modules and reintegrating them into the manufacture of new ones. The IEA assumes a recovery rate of 85% for all materials, which does not completely eliminate the need for virgin materials.⁴ The recovered materials must be purified before they can be reused.
Recycling solar PV modules generally remains technically complex and insufficiently profitable. This could represent an opportunity for Japan to aim for global leadership.
According to BloombergNEF, in Japan, in 2024, new solar PV outcompeted all other electricity generation technologies in terms of cost, including existing coal-fired power plants, even without carbon pricing [Figure 5].
In addition, new solar PV systems paired with batteries (four-hour duration) have proven to be competitive with existing combined-cycle gas turbines (CCGTs). This achievement is remarkable because it demonstrates that a reliable power supply based on a variable renewable energy is becoming a cost-effective reality.
Figure 5: Power Generation Cost of Selected Technologies – Japan, 2024
Thus, by expanding solar PV, with or without batteries, electricity generation from fossil fuels decreases. This results in lower electricity prices for consumers, as well as a reduction in fossil fuel imports and greenhouse gas emissions. This is a triple win for Japan: economic efficiency, energy security and environmental protection are now within reach.
Another piece of good news is that the deployment of solar PV primarily benefits the national economy. This is because in Japan, most of the economic value of solar PV is extracted by Japanese companies.
According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), in Japan, solar PV modules accounted for only 13% of the total installation cost of utility-scale projects [Figure 6]. The combined share of grid connection, installation and soft costs – the three other major cost categories – was almost six times higher (76%).
Figure 6: Breakdown of Utility-Scale Solar PV Total Installation Cost – Japan, 2024
Grid connection costs include all medium-voltage cables and connectors, as well as transformers and substations. In the power grid technology sector, Japanese companies such as Mitsubishi Electric, Hitachi Energy, Fuji Electric and Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions are major global players with a strong presence in their national market.
Installation costs include site preparation (access and internal roads, cable routing) and assembly of all necessary equipment (e.g., mounting structure, modules, inverters, grid connection components, monitoring and control systems). This work is typically carried out by domestic companies.
Soft costs are mainly divided between the margin of project developers (6% of the total installation cost) and permit fees (4%). In Japan, the leading developers of solar PV projects are Japanese companies such as Toyota Tsusho, ENEOS, ORIX, Tokyu Fudosan, Daiwa House and NTT.
Finally, inverters deserve a brief mention. They represent a minor part of the total installation cost (3%) but received considerable attention in the spring of 2025. Indeed, American experts discovered rogue communication devices in Chinese solar power inverters, raising concerns about energy security.⁵
It may be reassuring for the Japanese public to know that several Japanese companies market inverters domestically (e.g., Omron, Panasonic, Diamond & Zebra Electric, TMEIC, Nichicon and Yaskawa Electric).
According to RTS Corporation, Japanese companies accounted for 43% of domestic inverter shipments in 2024.⁶ The main foreign companies were the Chinese companies Huawei Technologies (34%) and Sungrow Power Supply (15%), and the German company SMA Solar Technology (6%).
Several solutions exist to address the problem of inverters manufactured by Chinese companies. First, thorough and systematic inspections of these inverters could be implemented. If rogue communication devices were also discovered in Japan, an import ban could be a decisive measure (see the example of Italy below). Simultaneously, production by Japanese companies and non-Chinese foreign companies established in Japan could be encouraged.
In the autumn of 2025, for diversification purposes, Italy held an auction for solar PV projects prohibiting the use of equipment (i.e., cells, modules and inverters) manufactured in China or by Chinese companies.⁷ The average price of the winning projects was €0.066/kWh. By comparison, in the summer of 2025, Italy held another auction without restrictions on the origin of the equipment. The average price of the winning projects was then €0.057/kWh. Therefore, the ban on Chinese products increased the price of solar PV by less than €0.01/kWh. This demonstrates that such a stringent measure has only a limited negative impact on the affordability of solar PV.
In conclusion, instead of fearing the Chinese industry, Japan should more actively promote solar PV and focus its efforts on implementing projects that meet societal expectations, particularly in terms of impact on host communities.

 
Prev
Archive
Next
PAGE
TOP
Copyright©Renewable Energy Institute.
All Rights Reserved.
This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse this website, you are consenting to our use of these cookies.
I agree

source

Montenegro’s Jugopetrol to install PV panels at 10 fuel stations in 2026  SeeNews
source

Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Says “No” To Solar Farms In 4-2 Vote  wjol.com
source

Published 5:00 am Saturday, April 4, 2026
By Ray Pitz
A Sherwood-area farm and grocery store is saving up to $28,000 on its annual electric bill — along with increasing crop yields — thanks to Portland General Electric solar towers that were funded in part by customers who support renewable energy.
Our Table Cooperative uses the towers, which pivot as the sun moves across the sky, at its farm and grocery store on property purchased in 2011 at 13390 S.W. Morgan Road.
The organic farm produces a variety of crops that include nuts, vegetables and fruits (blueberries, apples and strawberries), which are either sold in the grocery store or to restaurants and grocery stores in the Portland-metro area.
The store, whose ecofriendly interior features a 30-foot-tall vaulted ceiling made with timbers that came from an old dairy barn — the same wood used for the siding of the building — opened in 2014.
“We are trying to reimagine what the local food system could look like for the future — really, it’s about bringing people together around food,” Our Table Founder Narendra Varma said in a PGE statement.
Three years ago, Varma applied for a PGE Green Future Renewable Development Fund grant, which supports clean energy for small-innovative renewable projects by helping facilities reduce or eliminate carbon footprints. That fund comes from the 215,000 PGE customers who opt in to support clean energy.
The six towers the farm installed, paid in part by federal tax credits, have 28 solar panels per tower. They produce a total-rated capacity of 75 kilowatts — enough energy to power the entire 58-acre farm and its buildings — making the farm 100% energy independent, according to PGE officials.
“It’s a huge benefit to an organization like ours,” said Varma, who formally worked in the high-tech industry for eight years, which included a position at Microsoft.
The PGE fund also covers the cost of battery storage at Our Table Cooperative which, paired with the solar panels, provides energy after a power outage caused by storms.
“Our mission really is community through food. So it’s a bit of a weird mission where we’re trying to kind of reimagine what the local food system could look like (in) the future,” Varma said, “but really it’s about bringing people together around food.”

source

April 01, 2026 11:00 ET  | Source: Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
MALVERN, Pa., April 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH) today introduced a new Automotive Grade photovoltaic MOSFET driver that is the first such device in the compact SMD-4 package to provide a creepage distance of 8 mm and mold compound with a comparative tracking index (CTI) of 600. Designed to increase safety and reliability in high voltage automotive applications — while simplifying designs and reducing costs — the Vishay Semiconductors VODA1275 features the industry’s fastest turn-on times and the highest open circuit voltage and short circuit current in its class.
Classified as providing reinforced isolation, the device released today delivers an open circuit voltage of 20 V typical, short circuit current of 20 μA, and turn-on time of 80 μs, which is three times faster than competing devices. These characteristics enable quicker and more reliable driving of MOSFETs and IGBTs in high voltage systems. In addition, the device’s working isolation voltage of 1260 V_peak and isolation test voltage of 5300 V_RMS make it ideal for 800 V+ battery systems.
AEC-Q102 qualified, the VODA1275 is intended for use in pre-charge circuits, wall chargers, and battery management systems (BMS) for electric (EV) and hybrid electric (HEV) vehicles. While designers previously had to use two MOSFET drivers in series to generate the higher voltages required in these applications, the device’s high open circuit output voltage allows them to use just one, saving space and lowering costs. In addition, the driver enables the creation of custom solid-state relays to replace legacy electromechanical relays in next-generation vehicles.
The optically isolated VODA1275 draws all the current required to drive its internal circuitry from an infrared emitter on the low voltage side of the isolation barrier. This construction simplifies designs and lowers costs by eliminating the need for an external power supply. The MOSFET driver is RoHS-compliant, halogen-free, and Vishay Green.
Samples and production quantities of the VODA1275 are available now, with lead times of eight weeks.
Vishay manufactures one of the world’s largest portfolios of discrete semiconductors and passive electronic components that are essential to innovative designs in the automotive, industrial, computing, consumer, telecommunications, military, aerospace, and medical markets. Serving customers worldwide, Vishay is The DNA of tech.^® Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. is a Fortune 1000 Company listed on the NYSE (VSH). More on Vishay at www.Vishay.com.
The DNA of tech^® is a registered trademark of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
Vishay on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/VishayIntertechnology
Vishay Twitter feed: http://twitter.com/vishayindust
Links to product datasheets:
http://www.vishay.com/ppg?80495  (VODA1275)
Link to product photo:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/vishay/albums/72177720332762019
For more information please contact:
Vishay Intertechnology
Peter Henrici, +1 408 567-8400
peter.henrici@vishay.com
or
Redpines
Bob Decker, +1 415 409-0233
bob.decker@redpinesgroup.com
MALVERN, Pa., March 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH) today introduced a new compact, ready-to-use linear position sensor designed for high accuracy performance…
MALVERN, Pa., March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH) today introduced a new space-grade, surface-mount common mode choke designed to provide EMI filtering and…

source

Arctech Flagship SkyLine II: New Features Unlock Complex Solar Project Potential  acrofan.com
source

Two Connecticut towns at the center of growing opposition of solar farms take case to Lamont  yahoo.com
source

The Pine Tree State joins Utah and Virginia in advancing a law that establishes rules for small plug-in solar generation devices.
The Maine State House in Augusta
MonsieurNapoléon, CC BY-SA 3.0
With the state Senate’s passage of LD 1730 on April 2, 2026, Maine became the third state in the U.S. to pass legislation allowing citizens to use small plug-in solar devices to offset some of their electricity usage — joining Utah, which passed the nation’s first bill in 2025, and Virginia, which acted earlier this year.
Like the previous bills, Maine’s law would allow any retail electricity customer to install and use a single plug-in photovoltaic or battery system up to 1,200 watts.
The devices may be connected to standard outlets as long as they comply with certain National Electrical Code and UL safety standards.
Notably, the Maine bill is the first to specifically mention the new standards being developed under the UL 3700 outline of investigation, but it would also allow devices certified to comparable standards from other testing laboratories, or that meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC). 
The bill also prohibits utility companies from requiring interconnection agreements or fees to be paid by customers that use these devices. 
However, unlike the bills in Virginia and Utah, LD 1730 would create two classes of plug-in solar and battery systems defined by their output wattage. 
Owners of systems with power output greater than 420 watts would be required to have the devices installed by a licensed electrician, and required to notify their utility company of their use of the device within 30 days of installation. 
DIY installations of systems with 420 watts or less of power output would be allowed, with no requirement to notify the utility.
Absent from the Maine bill are the kinds of tenant protections that made the Virginia bill unique. The law does have a section regarding a tenant’s use of an eligible device, but it is limited to a requirement that the tenant ensures the system does not compromise the rental property or violate safety codes, and will reverse any changes they make to the structure when removing the device.
While Maine has a “solar rights” law on the books, the current statute only protects the rights of Maine renters to use “solar clothes-drying devices.” As written, the existing solar rights law allows restrictions on solar devices for a number of reasons, including “on residential property in common ownership with 3rd parties or common elements of a condominium.”
The bill, entitled “An Act to Make Small Plug-in Solar Generation Devices Accessible for All Maine Residents to Address the Energy Affordability Crisis,” will now head to the desk of governor Janet Mills, who will have 10 days to veto or sign it into law.
Support from Maine residents
In a joint statement, representatives of A Climate to Thrive (ACTT), Maine Climate Action Now (MCAN), Natural Resources Council of Maine (NRCM) celebrated the bill’s passage and expressed gratitude to bill sponsor Senator Nicole Grohoski and Representative Gary Friedmann, who testified in favor of the bill as it passed through the legislature’s Joint Standing Committee on Energy, Technology and Utilities.
“We are excited to see ratepayers empowered to take control of their electricity costs in the face of the current affordability crisis exacerbated by utilities’ high profit margins,” said MCAN director Amy Eshoo. In comments to pv magazine USA, Eshoo expressed confidence that Governor Mills will sign the bill.
Rebecca Schultz, senior advocate for climate & clean energy at the NRCM said, “As Mainers, we value self-reliance, and plug-in solar is one practical way we can help put affordable energy directly in the hands of more people across the state, allowing everyone from renters to lower-income households a simple way to take advantage of the cheapest energy on the planet.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from Ben Zientara
This bill is a meaningful step toward making small plug‑in solar more accessible, but the description of using a “standard outlet” needs a bit more technical clarity. Once UL 3700 is required, these systems can’t simply plug into any existing household receptacle. UL 3700 defines a dedicated, safety‑certified interconnection point with specific wiring and circuit requirements. Even for systems at or below 420 W, a licensed electrician would still be needed to install that dedicated circuit so the device can meet the UL 3700 conditions. The legislation is still a positive development, but the practical installation requirements are more involved than the phrase “standard outlet” suggests.
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
pv magazine USA offers daily updates of the latest photovoltaics news. We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.
Δ
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy © pv magazine 2026
Δ
Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source

Median solar module pricing in the United States reached $0.28 per watt as the market adjusted to intensified trade enforcement and new Foreign Entity of Concern compliance requirements, according to the Q1 2026 Quarterly Pricing & Domestic Content Report from Anza.
Image: Pexels / Gustavo Fring / CC SA 4.0
The U.S. solar market entered 2026 navigating a landscape defined by regulatory shifts and the persistent threat of supply chain disruptions. Following a year of volatility where median pricing rose by as much as 14% between January and November 2025, the first quarter of 2026 has seen prices hold at an elevated baseline.
The current stabilization at $0.28 per watt represents a shift from the $0.25 per watt levels seen in early 2025, driven by the convergence of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty determinations and the tightening of domestic content eligibility.
Higher prices are driven in part by stricter Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) rules. Under the Treasury Department’s updated guidance, projects seeking to qualify for the full 10% Domestic Content Bonus under the Inflation Reduction Act must navigate requirements regarding prohibited foreign entity material assistance. For projects beginning construction in 2026, the applicable threshold percentage for non-PFE produced property stands at 40% for solar facilities and 55% for Energy Storage Technologies. These thresholds are scheduled to escalate by 5% annually, creating urgency among developers to secure compliant hardware before the 2027 step-ups. 
Anza’s data, which aggregates median pricing from more than 40 suppliers representing over 95% of the U.S. module supply, highlights a growing price delta between compliant and non-compliant hardware. FEOC-compliant modules have seen a steady price increase of approximately 4.9% as supply chains reorganize to exclude components from restricted entities. In contrast, modules that do not meet FEOC standards saw a more aggressive price spike of 9.2% during the previous safe harbor rush.
Anza noted a convergence in the pricing of mainstream cell architectures. Mono PERC saw its historic price advantage over newer technologies nearly disappear. Median pricing for Mono PERC modules stood at approximately $0.275 per watt in Q1. This represents a 4.2% increase from late 2025 levels, as buyers favored the mature supply chain of PERC to mitigate risks associated with newer technologies.
Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) technology is currently priced at a median of $0.285 per watt. While TOPCon previously commanded a more significant premium, patent litigation among Tier-1 suppliers has introduced a layer of caution for some buyers. Despite these intellectual property concerns, the efficiency gains of TOPCon continue to drive high demand in the utility-scale segment. Heterojunction (HJT) modules remain the most expensive mainstream option, holding at $0.39 per watt. The HJT market is characterized by limited U.S. availability, with pricing driven more by specific cell origin and tariff status than by broader market commoditization. 
The domestic manufacturing landscape is also showing signs of bifurcated pricing. Modules utilizing U.S.-made cells command the highest premium in the market, with prices at $0.46 per watt. The price reflects a 5.7% increase, as developers compete for a limited pool of domestically produced cells required to maximize tax credit value.
Conversely, U.S.-assembled modules that utilize imported cells have seen more volatility. Pricing for these hybrid domestic products rose to $0.36 per watt, a nearly 6% increase from the previous quarter. Many buyers are blending domestic modules with imported units or high-value domestic balance of system components like racking and inverters to hit the 40% domestic content threshold while managing overall capital expenditure, said the report.
Imported module pricing has remained relatively flat at $0.265 per watt for products not subject to the most severe trade penalties. However, the shadow of the Section 232 investigation looms over these figures. The investigation, which aims to determine if imported solar components pose a national security threat, could lead to new universal tariffs or quotas.
Furthermore, the anticipated AD/CVD determinations on imports from India, Indonesia, and Laos have begun to influence procurement strategies. Modules from Southeast Asian countries already affected by trade policy saw a 7.7% price increase late last year, and while they have eased slightly, they remain higher than pre-litigation levels. 
In the Energy Storage System sector, the pricing trajectory has diverged from that of solar modules. Battery storage pricing has continued to decline, providing a counterbalance to rising module costs for integrated solar-plus-storage projects.
For a 10 MW 4-hour distributed generation system, the AC Wrap median CAPEX price fell to $212 per kWh, representing a 6.8% decrease. Self-integrated battery systems in the same segment dropped to $173 per kWh. Utility-scale storage followed a similar downward trend, with AC Wrap pricing reaching $194 per kWh and self-integrated pricing falling to $158 per kWh, a 10.6% decline from the peak levels seen in mid-2025. This downward pressure is attributed to falling lithium carbonate costs and an expansion of battery manufacturing capacity outside of China, though Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports scheduled to hit 25% this year remain a variable. 
Looking forward to the remainder of 2026, Anza warns that the status quo of $0.28 per watt module pricing may be short-lived. The potential for Section 232 tariffs on polysilicon and its derivatives could create a new wave of upward pressure, particularly for domestic manufacturers who still rely on imported raw materials.
Additionally, the Treasury’s Cost Percentage Safe Harbor tables, which allow taxpayers to use assigned cost percentages for domestic content calculations, will be a critical tool for developers navigating 2026 construction starts. As the industry moves toward the 40% domestic content requirement, the premium for U.S.-made cells is expected to remain high, further widening the gap between low-cost imported hardware and tax-advantaged domestic products. 
The report concludes that procurement strategies in 2026 must be increasingly granular. Buyers can no longer focus solely on the cents per watt sticker price but must instead account for the impact of tariffs, the value of the 10% domestic content bonus, and the long-term risk of supply chain audits under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and FEOC rules.
As the market absorbs these regulatory costs, the baseline for U.S. solar pricing appears to have shifted higher, ending the era of sub-twenty-cent utility-scale modules in the American market.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from Ryan Kennedy
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
pv magazine USA offers daily updates of the latest photovoltaics news. We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.
Δ
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy © pv magazine 2026
Δ
Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source

Natural Resources Council of Maine
Protecting the Nature of Maine
Posted on April 3, 2026 by NRCM
Filed Under: Clean Energy, Climate, Maine Environmental News Tagged With: News Release, renewable energy, solar
The Natural Resources Council of Maine is a nonprofit membership organization protecting, restoring, and conserving Maine’s environment, now and for future generations. Join NRCM today!
3 Wade Street, Augusta, Maine 04330
Phone: 207.622.3101 Toll Free: 800.287.2345
Fax: 207.622.4343

 
 
Privacy Policy
NRCM Careers & Internships

Sign up for our email list
NRCM recognizes and honors the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, Mi’kmaq Nation, Penobscot Nation, and the Passamaquoddy Tribe, collectively the Wabanaki Nations. Wabanaki translates as “People of the Dawn.” The Wabanaki Nations have stewarded Maine for generations, stretching back to before colonial settlers forcibly occupied the area. NRCM’s office in Augusta is on the unceded territory of the Penobscot Nation, and all of us in Maine are on unceded lands once overseen by Wabanaki people. Let us remember this history and move forward with a commitment to justice and alignment with Wabanaki Nations in Maine. (Read full land acknowledgement.)

© 2026 Copyright · Natural Resources Council of Maine · All Rights Reserved · Website Design by Seaside Web Design, LLC ·

source

NTPC Renewable Energy has issued a tender for a BoS package for a 200 MW grid-connected solar PV project in Bikaner, Rajasthan. Bid submission ends on May 5, 2026.
April 04, 2026. By Mrinmoy Dey

Mobile Charging and Energy Storage Will Drive India’s EV Adoption: Mobec’s Harry Bajaj

10th Edition of RenewX Expo Set to Showcase a Decade of Clean Energy Progress

Trontek’s Samrath Kochar Explains How Rooftop Solar Adoption is Boosting Battery Storage Demand

Waterless Robotics Can Recover Up to 12% Lost Solar Generation, Says TAYPRO’s Yogesh Kudale

From Aerospace to EVs: Why Spherical Aluminium Powders Are Game-Changing

source

Zaragoza City Council Commissions 220 kW Solar Plant, Awards Rooftop PV Contract to Iberdrola Clientes  solarquarter.com
source

Japan government adopts bill mandating solar panel disposal plans  Azərtac
source

Daily e-Edition
Evening e-Edition
Sign up for email newsletters

Sign up for email newsletters
Daily e-Edition
Evening e-Edition
Gov. Ned Lamont criticized the loss of farmland and other open space for the construction of Connecticut’s largest solar array on Tuesday. But he stopped short of expressing support for a moratorium on further solar development in towns at the epicenter of the state’s solar industry.
Lamont’s visit to East Windsor — home to the 120-megawatt Gravel Pit Solar project and several smaller arrays — was arranged by local critics of the developments. They say their community has been inundated with solar panels, which have taken over farms, made noise and caused other quality-of-life problems that alter the town’s rural character.
Last month, the Connecticut Siting Council signed off on a 30-megawatt expansion that would add an additional 150 acres to Gravel Pit’s footprint in East Windsor. The town has already pledged to appeal the ruling.
“I love clean renewable power that’s also affordable, but I also love open space, protecting open space,” Lamont said after being driven on a tour around the sprawling facility. “I don’t think we have that balance right, right now.”
The tour highlighted a tricky political question facing Lamont and other Democrats who are supportive of the state’s long-term climate goals: how to build clean, renewable sources of electricity without angering the people living alongside those projects.
Residents in East Windsor and surrounding river valley towns, such as Enfield and Ellington, say they’ve already done their part playing host to large solar arrays. Together, the six-town region produces nearly a third of the state’s grid-scale solar output.
“Too much of a good thing can become very bad,” said state Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor. “We’re seeing that something that started with a good concept is overwhelming our community.”
Anwar and the principal organizer of the tour, state Rep. Jaime Foster, D-Ellington, have sponsored House Bill 5551, which would allow officials in any town that’s home to or abutting a solar facility larger than 100 megawatts to veto new projects within their borders. (Under those parameters, the bill would only apply to East Windsor and neighboring towns.)
Asked after his tour whether he would support such a policy, Lamont hedged.
“I’d like to do something broader than that, so we’re not just taking care of one or two towns. But what I can do statewide is to make sure that this doesn’t happen again, and make sure that any of these things that aren’t yet developed we can preserve,” Lamont said.
The governor also expressed dismay at the name the developers chose for Gravel Pit Solar, which came from an old quarry on which a portion of the array was built. “I saw a beautiful open space, beautiful fields, and this ought to be the last place you want to develop,” Lamont said.
A spokesperson for Gravel Pit’s owner, DESRI Holdings, declined to comment on Lamont’s visit.
Decisions on where to place large solar arrays and other power projects fall to the Connecticut Siting Council, which was formed in the 1970s take over a process that had previously been subject to the use of eminent domain by utility companies.
State law allows the Siting Council to consider a variety of factors in its decisions, including a project’s impact on agriculture, forests and scenic areas, as well as its potential impact on air and water quality. Other local concerns, such as the effect on property values or municipal tax tolls, are not part of the council’s evaluation criteria.
Melanie Bachman, executive director of the Siting Council, said in an email that none of the land used by Gravel Pit Solar had been set aside for protection under Connecticut’s open space and farmland preservation programs. In addition, she noted that the developers had pledged to allow sheep grazing and beekeeping on parts of the property, while also donating 70 acres of land to East Windsor for conservation.
Bachman declined to comment specifically on the governor’s remarks on the project.
In 2023, Lamont vetoed legislation that would have allowed municipalities to appoint a nonvoting member to weigh in on projects before the Siting Council. In his veto message, the governor explained that the bill could give opponents within a town access to sensitive information about applicants, while also eroding the council’s authority to approve “climate-positive projects,” such as transmission lines and solar facilities.
Still, lawmakers have put forward a similar bill this session to give towns a greater role in Siting Council decisions.
Lamont declined to say Tuesday whether he would veto that legislation, Senate Bill 144, if it reaches his desk. Supporters say they’ve added language requiring nonvoting members to abide by the council’s confidentiality rules, in order to ease some of the governor’s concerns.
Foster and her allies have proposed several ways to alter the structure of the Siting Council to give towns a greater voice, while still preserving its ability to preempt local control. Those ideas include having a permanent member with experience in municipal government, or seat for a representative of the regional council of governments in the area where a project is proposed.
“I have long held the assumption that the current membership of the Siting Council… have a sort of myopic view on what holds weight in their consideration, and I think that’s pretty clearly demonstrated in their approvals,” Foster said. “To diversify the membership and perspective on the board would be helpful.”
In testimony submitted to lawmakers last month, Bachman argued that the Siting Council has already undergone legislative changes in recent years to alter the makeup of its members and provide for greater input by local officials.
She warned that further changes, such as those proposed in H.B. 5551 and S.B. 144, would threaten the independence of the council to act on behalf of all Connecticut residents, as well as the environment.
In East Windsor, however, residents expressed frustration with the Siting Council’s repeated approvals of new solar projects. At one stop along his tour Tuesday, Lamont was met with a large, hand-painted sign affixed to a trailer urging him to “stop solar saturation.”
The sign was the work of Amanda Berube, who lives across the street from a smaller solar array owned by NextEra that has faced persistent complaints from neighbors who say it emits a loud buzzing noise during the day. In addition, the array experienced a brush fire last year that was attributed to nearby utility equipment.
Berube and her neighbors are also alarmed over the latest proposal from Gravel Pit’s owners to develop another, 100-megawatt array known as Saltbox Solar on farmland within East Windsor and Ellington.
While the developers have yet to submit Saltbox Solar to the Siting Council for approval, online plans show it would leave Berube’s subdivision surrounded by solar panels on three sides.
“It would just be devastating to our neighborhood, it would be devastating to the neighborhood in Ellington,” and to local dairy farmers who use the land to grow corn to feed their cows, she said. “So I just really hope that something can be done, that the legislation can pass, so that we can finally put an end to this.”
John Moritz is a reporter for the Connecticut Mirror. Copyright 2026 @ CT Mirror (ctmirror.org). 
Copyright 2026 Hartford Courant. All rights reserved. The use of any content on this website for the purpose of training artificial intelligence systems, algorithms, machine learning models, text and data mining, or similar use is strictly prohibited without explicit written consent.

source

We use cookies to improve your experience and for marketing. Read our cookie policy or manage cookies.
Search across reports, market insights, and blog stories.
German module manufacturer Bauer Solar has introduced a new back-contact solar panel to its product lineup, according to a report from pv magazine Germany. The initial offering is a full-black glass-glass version with a power output of 480 watts.
The panel is constructed using 108 bifacial half-cells and has dimensions of 1,800 by 1,134 by 30 millimeters, with a weight of 24.8 kilograms. The company states the module achieves a power conversion efficiency of 23.52 percent.
Specifications include front and rear glass panes that are each 2 millimeters thick and feature anti-reflective coatings. The module frame is constructed from anodized black aluminum alloy. The product is rated for operation in temperatures ranging from -40 to 85 degrees Celsius and can handle a maximum system voltage of 1,500 volts. It is designed to withstand static loads up to 5,400 pascals and carries an HW3 hail resistance rating, alongside fire protection class A certification.
Bauer Solar is providing a 30-year product and performance warranty for the new module. The linear performance guarantee ensures a minimum of 88.85 percent of the original output after three decades. The manufacturer indicated plans to increase the output of its back-contact modules to 500 watts later this year with additional variants.
Alongside the new back-contact technology, the company will continue its focus on TOPCon products, with an expansion of that portfolio planned for the coming summer. The new TOPCon variants are expected to reach an output of 465 watts. Bauer Solar targets the residential rooftop market with these modules, positioning them as an economical solution, though specific pricing was not disclosed.
Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business
A Quick Overview of Market Performance
Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects
Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business
Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain
Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export
The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry
The Largest Import Supplying Countries
The Largest Destinations for Exports
The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles
The Largest Markets And Their Profiles
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.
IndexBox, Inc.
2093 Philadelphia Pike #1441
Claymont, DE 19703, USA
Contact us
© 2026 IndexBox, Inc
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.

source

Rooftop solar generating capacity in Puerto Rico totaled 1,456 megawatts (MW) at the end of 2025, 20% of the overall capacity mix. Rooftop solar capacity has increased faster than other sources over the past decade. Between 2016 and 2025 rooftop solar installations accounted for 81% of the new generating capacity in Puerto Rico, according to data from our Electric Power Monthly and Puerto Rico Energy Bureau’s (PREB) Quarterly Report on System Data. In 2025, rooftop solar became the second-largest capacity source, after petroleum liquids capacity (3,671 MW), and surpassed natural gas capacity (1,391 MW).
Distributed generation resources, particularly rooftop solar coupled with battery systems, have grown as Puerto Rico has grappled with electricity reliability and frequent power outages. On average, 3,850 rooftop solar panel systems were installed in homes and businesses per month in 2025, with a cumulative 191,929 systems in place at the end of the year.
In addition to rooftop solar capacity, distributed battery storage has also increased in Puerto Rico. According to data from PREB, 171,372 households and businesses had a distributed battery storage system at the end of 2025, with a total energy capacity of 2,864 megawatt-hours.
Puerto Rico established net metering policies in August 2007 allowing rooftop solar owners to sell excess electricity to the grid. Last summer, Puerto Rico’s grid operator, LUMA, expanded the Customer Battery Energy Sharing program, allowing power stored in distributed battery storage units to supply power to the grid when the operator forecasts electricity supply shortages. Thousands of these batteries form systems known as virtual power plants (VPP). VPPs are an aggregation of geographically dispersed distributed energy resources, like batteries that can dispatch power to the grid as one singular power plant. Companies like Sunrun, Tesla, and others work with LUMA and manage these VPPs. Participating battery owners are financially compensated for exporting excess electricity to the grid.
Article from Today in Energy. Principal contributor: Lindsay Aramayo
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy
The EIA collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment.
US Energy Information Administration has 330 posts and counting. See all posts by US Energy Information Administration

source

Solar energy led global renewable power growth in 2025, with Africa recording its highest expansion on record, according to a new report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).
In its ‘Renewable Capacity Statistics 2026’ report released on Tuesday, IRENA said solar accounted for about 75 percent of new renewable energy capacity added last year.
The report said global renewable capacity rose to 5,149 gigawatts (GW) in 2025 after adding 692 GW — a 15.5 percent increase.
It added that off-grid solar solutions also continued to expand, particularly in regions with limited electricity access, including parts of Africa.
Wind energy followed solar growth, while other sources such as hydropower and bioenergy contributed smaller shares.
“Approximately three-quarters of the capacity expansion was in the form of solar energy, which increased by 511 GW (+27.2%); this was followed by wind energy, with additions of 159 GW (+14.0%). Renewable hydropower capacity increased by 18.4 GW (+1.4%); bioenergy by 3.4 GW (+2.3%); and geothermal energy by 0.3 GW (+1.7%),” the report reads.
“Solar and wind energy continued to dominate renewable capacity expansion in 2025, jointly accounting for 96.8% of all net renewable additions.
“2025 marks the highest annual increase in renewable generation capacity to date and the highest growth on record in percentage terms.”
Despite the global surge, the agency said Africa’s growth, though the highest on record, remained modest compared to other regions.
The continent added 11.3 GW of renewable capacity in 2025, representing a 15.9 percent increase, driven largely by projects in Ethiopia, South Africa, and Egypt.
“The Middle East recorded its largest growth rate, at 28.9% (+12.7 GW) in 2025, with Saudi Arabia accounting for the majority of this expansion,” IRENA said.
“By the end of 2025, the Group of Seven (G7) countries (excluding the European Union) accounted for 22.1% of the global capacity share, totalling 1140 GW.
“The Group of Twenty (G20) countries (excluding the European Union and African Union) accounted for 81.8% of the global share, with a total capacity of 4210 GW.
“The G7 and G20 countries accounted for 12.0% and 88.5% of new capacity, respectively, in 2025.”
IRENA said the figures highlight a widening gap in clean energy deployment between regions, with Asia accounting for more than 70 percent of global additions.
The report noted that countries with lower renewable capacity, including many in Africa, remain more vulnerable to energy shocks and rising fuel costs.
Commenting on the findings, Francesco La Camera, IRENA director-general, said renewable energy is becoming increasingly important for energy security.
“In the midst of uncertain time, renewable energy remains consistent and steadfast in its expansion,” he said.
“A more decentralised energy system, with a growing share of renewables and more market players, is structurally more resilient.
“Countries that invested in the energy transition are weathering the Middle East crisis with less economic damage, as they boost energy security, resilience and competitiveness.”
IRENA said the global shift towards renewables is being driven in part by concerns over fossil fuel price volatility and geopolitical tensions, which have exposed the risks of relying on imported energy.
The report called for increased investments in regions with low renewable capacity to improve energy access and strengthen resilience.

source

We use cookies to improve your experience and for marketing. Read our cookie policy or manage cookies.
Search across reports, market insights, and blog stories.
A team at Kyushu University has developed a method that may guide photovoltaic technology past persistent efficiency limits. According to a report in pv magazine, the work centers on a quantum process called singlet fission, where a single photon can create two electron-hole pairs.
The researchers paired singlet-fission materials with a specially designed molybdenum-based spin-flip emitter. This combination demonstrated energy conversion in a solution with an effective quantum yield of approximately 130%. The emitter is designed to capture triplet excitons, which are often non-emissive, and convert them into near-infrared light.
The molecular design of the emitter allows for an electron spin flip during light absorption or emission. This enables more efficient harvesting of the multiple excitons generated by singlet fission. The structure of the molecular linker connecting the light-absorbing units is a critical factor, heavily influencing the efficiency and dynamics of the energy transfer process.
Applications in solar cells will require integrating these materials into solid-state systems, a step the researchers note they are actively pursuing. The approach could block certain energy loss pathways in silicon solar cells, allowing for selective extraction of energy from triplet states. Beyond photovoltaics, the method may also enable new quantum technologies and contribute to next-generation quantum material design.
The findings were published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business
A Quick Overview of Market Performance
Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects
Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business
Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain
Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export
The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry
The Largest Import Supplying Countries
The Largest Destinations for Exports
The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles
The Largest Markets And Their Profiles
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.
IndexBox, Inc.
2093 Philadelphia Pike #1441
Claymont, DE 19703, USA
Contact us
© 2026 IndexBox, Inc
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.

source

Greenskies Clean Energy filed a petition last year to build a 1.2-megawatt solar facility on mostly vacant land along Lake Street in Manchester, as pictured on Jan. 15, 2026.
Greenskies Clean Energy filed a petition last year to build a 1.2-megawatt solar facility on mostly vacant land along Lake Street in Manchester, as pictured on Jan. 15, 2026.
Greenskies Clean Energy filed a petition last year to build a 1.2-megawatt solar facility on mostly vacant land along Lake Street in Manchester, as pictured on Jan. 15, 2026.
MANCHESTER — State officials have approved a Lake Street solar facility that has proved controversial among some neighbors.
The Connecticut Siting Council approved a petition from North Haven-based solar developer Greenskies Clean Energy to build a 1.2-megawatt solar photovoltaic electric generating facility at 81 and 93 Lake St., two largely vacant agricultural properties totaling close to 30 acres.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
The project consists of two separate but connected solar arrays, with a 750-kilowatt facility on 93 Lake St. and a 450-kilowatt facility on 81 Lake St. taking up a total footprint of 6.3 acres with a combined 2,136 modules.
The original petition filed by Greenskies in August billed the facility as providing "multiple benefits" to the town, state, and region through production of renewable energy, and the Siting Council's decision echoes that sentiment.
The draft decision and order, dated March 27, states that the Siting Council finds there is a "public benefit" for the construction of the facility and that it would not have a "substantial adverse environmental effect," and that the council will therefore issue a declaratory ruling for the proposed facility.
The Siting Council's draft opinion, dated March 27, states that pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes, the council has "exclusive jurisdiction" over the facility proposed by Greenskies and shall approve by declaratory ruling any such project as long as it "meets the air and water quality standards of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and the Council does not find a substantial adverse environmental effect."
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
The opinion states that the proposed facilities would be remotely monitored on a 24/7 basis and comply with relevant building, electrical, and fire protection codes, and Greenskies would work with local emergency responders and file an emergency response plan. Noise generation and air quality would comply with state standards, and DEEP would need to issue a stormwater permit prior to construction.
The opinion further states that Greenskies has expressed a willingness to install landscape plantings and implement best management practices for stormwater in response to neighborhood concerns about visibility of the facility and water quality.
Members of the Siting Council approved approved the plan in a 7-0 vote Thursday, with one member recusing themselves. Few spoke about the project in detail during the meeting, though one member briefly discussed his issues with the plan.
Bill Syme said the proposal from Greenskies was not "one of (his) favorites" due to prime farmland being taken out of production, but that he could foresee minimal impact to neighbors and the environment.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Khristine Hall said she was happy that a condition for a post-construction noise study was included, though noted it is typical for the Siting Council to do so.
"Even though the host parcel owner was not concerned about the noise, which may be above the noise limits, I think it's important to have that study and see what the compliance is once the facility is started," Hall said.
Chance Carter thanked staff members for working on the documents, and said he was pleased to see that the approval requires Greenskies to work with the town's fire department to ensure emergency services can reach the site.
Advertisement
Article continues below this ad
Joseph Villanova is a reporter with the Journal Inquirer and CT Insider, primarily covering Manchester and East Hartford. He joined the newsroom in July 2021.
About
Contact
Services
Account

source

Cost, complexity and confidence gaps are the main barriers to the uptake of rooftop solar in Australia according to new federal government research.
Image: CER
A new survey shows that the upfront cost of purchasing and installing rooftop solar is the most common barrier to its uptake while the complexity of choice is also a major pain point for consumers.
The Behavioural Economics Team of the Australian government (BETA) has surveyed nearly 4,900 people for its Towards Net Zero study, examining how households decide on home energy upgrades, with a focus on rooftop solar.
Of the respondents with solar panels, the most common reason for installing solar was financial with 67% of solar owners citing bill savings as their main motivation, but almost half of those said upfront expenses had made the decision to get solar difficult. Those without solar were even more likely to view cost as the primary barrier with nearly half of respondents citing cost as the main reason the choice to get rooftop solar was difficult.
Cost was also the most common reason people with solar panels had not purchased batteries.
Behind cost, the second most common friction to installing solar is the complexity of choice with half of respondents who were planning to install solar finding it difficult to choose the right type and size of system, choose an installer, work out how much to spend, and learn the technical jargon.
Image: BETA
The survey shows that respondents who were planning to install solar within the next five years perceived many associated tasks to be difficult.
“More than 50% of this group found it difficult to choose the system that was right for them, choose an installer, work out how much money to spend, learn the technical jargon and work out how big the system would be,” BETA said.
“Such complexity can create enough friction to grind the process to a halt.”
BETA said confidence emerged as a critical enabler with clear information from salespeople and installers helping to reduce complexity and enable action.
“Confidence may be the key ingredient to help people follow through on their intention to make home upgrades,” the researchers said. “A combination of easy-to-access and easy-to-understand general advice, paired with customised recommendations from trustworthy retailers or tradespeople … can help overcome the frictions introduced by the complexity or difficulty of tasks.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from David Carroll
I’m a Retired Electrician and have found your emails interesting. But as I am now 98 years and 8 months old, I cannon make use of what I read, so I think it is time to stop receiving your emails. Thank you for all you have sent me up to now, it has been very interesting and greatly appreciated.
Thanks for being a subscriber, Fred, we appreciate you’ve been connecting with pv magazine Australia and have found value in the content. All the best.
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
By subscribing to our newsletter you’ll be eligible for a 10% discount on magazine subscriptions!
Δ
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy © pv magazine 2026
pv magazine Australia offers bi-weekly updates of the latest photovoltaics news.
We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.
Δ
This website uses cookies to anonymously count visitor numbers. To find out more, please see our Data Protection Policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source

© 2025 THE COOL DOWN COMPANY. All Rights Reserved. Do not sell or share my personal information. Reach us at hello@thecooldown.com.
“I don’t want to lose the house.”
Photo Credit: iStock
A nervous homebuyer recently sparked a discussion on Reddit’s r/solar after entering a contract on a California home with a 20-year solar lease attached. 
In their post, the potential buyer shared detailed calculations on energy rates in the area (which, as the home is in California, are higher than the national average), the lease cost, and the long-term savings of the deal, seeking honest feedback and advice. 
Solar panels are one of the most reliable ways to reduce your energy costs — but whether you’re considering leasing, buying them outright, or financing, it’s important to understand your options before installing them. 
If you have questions about which panels are right for your situation and home, TCD partner EnergySage offers free tools to help you save up to $10,000 on new solar panel installations. 
Based on this poster’s calculations, including predicted year-by-year electricity rate increases in their area, buying the home and keeping the leased solar panels would likely save them big on energy costs. 
Still, they asked Reddit to weigh in before making a final commitment. 
“I put my calculations in the Google sheet below, and it seems like I would save a few thousand over PGE every year,” the original poster wrote. “Am I seeing this wrong?”
Commenters quickly chimed in to discuss the pros and cons of solar panel leases. 
FROM OUR PARTNER
Whatever your solar budget, Palmetto can help you save.
If you want to buy your own panels, Palmetto’s advisors can help you save up to $10,000 on installation through a network of preferred installers. And if you’d rather get solar savings without upfront costs, Palmetto’s revolutionary LightReach subscription program can deliver — including an exclusive $1,000 cashback offer for TCD readers.
LightReach lets you lease solar panels with no money down, making it painless to lock in long-term savings of up to 33% off your current power bill. Palmetto covers a 25-year warranty for the panels, which means you’ll get reliable performance without unforeseen costs.
To get started, just book a short meeting with Palmetto’s experts to explore your options and find the solution that’s right for you.
Although buying solar panels outright offers the largest savings on electric bills, a solar lease with monthly payments can still be a worthwhile investment to keep utility costs down.
“A good lease will be better than PG&E, but not as good as a purchase,” one user observed.
Which of these savings plans for rooftop solar panels would be most appealing for you?
Save $1,000 this year 💸
Save less this year but $20k in 10 years 💰
Save less in 10 years but $80k in 20 years 🤑
Couldn’t pay me to go solar 😒
Click your choice to see results and earn rewards to spend on home upgrades.

While some commenters advised the buyer to insist that the owner buy out the panels, the original poster said that the housing market was extremely competitive in their area. 
“I’ll likely lose the house if I ask the seller to pay,” they explained. 
“I don’t want to lose the house. So, as long as I am even or saving money over no solar, then I am fine,” the user added.
It can be complicated to navigate all your options for installing solar panels, but TCD has partners to help you understand your options and find the best system for your situation. 
If you’re ready to start your bill-slashing journey, there are several free resources. 
• EnergySage can help you save up to $10,000 on installations by curating competitive bids from local installers 
• Not ready to spend up front? Palmetto’s $0-down LightReach solar leasing program can lower your utility rate by up to 20%
• TCD’s Solar Explorer makes it easy to access exclusive offers from preferred partners 
Pairing solar panels with energy-efficient electric appliances, such as heat pumps, can further lower your utility bills. 
TCD partner Mitsubishi can help you cut energy costs by finding you a highly efficient heating and cooling system that’s perfect for your home and budget. 
While you’re at it, consider installing the free Palmetto Home app. 
By completing in-app challenges and cutting down your home energy use, you can unlock up to $5,000 in rewards to upgrade your home.  
Get TCD’s free newsletters for easy tips to save more, waste less, and make smarter choices — and earn up to $5,000 toward clean upgrades in TCD’s exclusive Rewards Club.
© 2025 THE COOL DOWN COMPANY. All Rights Reserved. Do not sell or share my personal information. Reach us at hello@thecooldown.com.

source

Silicon Ranch to host community meeting on proposed Stockton solar project  Gulf Coast Media
source

Apr 3, 2026
Howard Williams of Muncy gives testimony during the conditional use hearing by the Muncy Creek Township Supervisors in Muncy. DAVE KENNEDY/Sun-Gazette
A Muncy Creek Township lay witness at a conditional use hearing where Sunny Side Up Farms frequently clashed in testimony with the applicant’s counsel.
Howard Williams continued with testimony Wednesday in front of the packed house at the township building.
Sunny Side Up Farms wants to site five barns, each with 70,000 free-range chickens on land it owns bordered by Clarkstown Road, Fogelman Road and Muncy Exchange Road. It’s called a concentrated animal feeding operation. It also is a site proposed for 55,000-plus solar panels by Bollinger Solar LLC, making it agrivoltaic. The property is zoned for agricultural conservation and residential use.
Among the data in the report by Williams, a township resident, presented is fact-based and academic research on CAFOs, including their air emissions that can impact people living near such animal farms.
“Isn’t it true that the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has not adopted a model for monitoring emissions from animal feeding operations?” Attorney Samuel E. Wiser Jr., counsel for the applicant, asked Williams.
Howard Williams of Muncy gives testimony during the conditional use hearing by the Muncy Creek Township Supervisors in Muncy. DAVE KENNEDY/Sun-Gazette
“The EPA has for over 25 years dithered on this matter, and they haven’t decided much at all,” Williams said in response to Wiser’s question. “They do, however, recommend the Screen3 is used,” Williams said. “It is credible, it is appropriate and it identifies this.”
Screen3 is a widely used screening-level air dispersion model. It is a single-source plume model designed to provide quick, conservative estimates of maximum ground-level concentrations of air pollutants, and it was used as part of the data presented to the board.
Williams has also testified that an AERMOD also be done in this animal farm proposal. That is the EPA’s preferred, state-of-the-art atmospheric dispersion modeling system used to predict ground-level pollutant concentrations from industrial sources.
Williams, who is not considered to be or wanted to be thought of as an expert, also used Penn State Extension AI as part of his presentation to Supervisors Eric Newcomer, chair, and Harley Fry II.
As part of his cross examination, Wiser produced a document from the EPA Office of Inspector General in a publication in 2017 and asked Williams to agree if what was written on the report was in it. It read: “A lack of reliable methods for estimating these emissions prevented the EPA and state and local agencies from determining whether these operations are subject to statutory requirements.”
Howard Williams of Muncy prepares to give testimony during the conditional use hearing by the Muncy Creek Township Supervisors in Muncy. DAVE KENNEDY/Sun-Gazette
“You have handed me one page of what is likely a larger document,” Williams said. He noted there are other reports showing the Screen3 is sufficient for the purpose of showing emissions, concentration and how that (land) fall into the air, the homes, the people in the neighborhood of a CAFO, he noted.
“Are you aware that the EPA is still in the process of refining their modeling for measuring emissions from animal feeding operations?” Wiser asked Williams.
“I did not present my testimony on the basis of dealing with a regulator that is not doing what a regulator should be doing,” Williams said. “I presented my testimony on the basis of how do we describe and submit to the board, so that they can really look at it . . . how do we describe the areas of endangerment for residents relative to human health, safety, general welfare and greater harm?”
Wiser interrupted him. “Mr. Williams, I am curious,” he said, continuing, “if the EPA hasn’t even adopted a reliable model for measuring emissions for animal feeding operations, why does a model that you developed, using technology that was replaced 15 years ago by the EPA have any credibility whatsoever?”
“The model is still used in the trade,” Williams said. “The EPA has not withdrawn it, to my knowledge, and it is still a good and useful model, and, as I have recommended, what the board is going to need to do is deal with this ‘he said’ ‘she said.’”
“You are not producing evidence of no harm, you are making an argument against the design and use of a Screen3 that has been supported in other areas by the EPA,” Williams said. “That’s your only argument.”
Williams, furthermore, testified that the only way the emissions question will get settled, is if the township board is able to contract with an environmental engineering firm that fully understands what the integrator is going to do in the farm. After that is done, then the AERMOD engineer can look at the wind patterns at Muncy, which can be totally different from those at Williamsport, where they are registered.
Williams said his data strongly corresponds to an AERMOD study done in Poland, and it will be up to these gentlemen (township board) to consider contracting with the environmental engineer.
Williams, who is a township resident who has testified about hazardous materials emissions before Congress, has also in testimony shared his dislike of the term “receptors,” in his battle against this proposed farm, which also has a proposed solar array aspect.
Receptors is a static term used by environmental regulators, risk assessors, and impact specialists to identify, map, and mitigate risks from pollution, construction, or hazardous materials. The people, plants, animals and other things in the environment that could be affected” are considered to be receptors.
Wiser also earlier in the night asked Williams to present in the township zoning ordinance where screening is required to be done.
“I do not presume to present zoning information,” Williams said, adding his presentation is to present evidence of harm to human health, safety, general welfare and greater harm than normal.
“I presented that because none of your witnesses have established that there was no harm,” Williams said. He then made a reference to the former testimony by Cody Snyder, who will be the manager with AgVentures, who formerly testified that he lives near two large turkey CAFOS, and has an 18-month-old daughter.
“He’s cool with that,” Williams said, but I don’t think the residents aren’t “cool with breathing in the emissions.” “I wasn’t talking about regulation,” he said. “Regulators aren’t going to save us.”
Wiser asked Williams to point to any section of the zoning ordinance that requires screening for this use. Williams said he could point to the Municipal Planning Code that says objector testimony must establish the evidence that harm to human health, safety, general welfare and greater harm aren’t going to occur.
“So the question was – It is simply your opinion that screening should be a part of this process?”
“No it is not an opinion,” Williams responded. “It is based on fact that the EPA created Screen3 for this explicit purpose,” he said. The purpose, he explained, is to give a review of the hazard of the air emissions … to look at … like a preview of a movie … to look at a preview of hazardous chemicals, the concentration, and the deposition — how far out is this going to reach, who is this going to impact, and it is used to identify — receptors.
A federal judge is reviewing a proposed draft order that the Center for Independent Living be able to recover from …
Average U.S. households using natural gas for heating this winter (2025–2026) paid roughly $700 to $868 for the …

Copyright © 2026 Sun-Gazette, LLC | https://www.sungazette.com | 252 W. Fourth Street, Williamsport, PA 17703 | 570-326-1551

source

Apartments, a solar farm and school upgrades are among projects planned in central Pa.  PennLive
source

India emerges as third-largest renewable energy market in 2025: IRENA  business-standard.com
source

Credits: Red Zeppelin, Manny Becerra, Internal edition
The impact of energy production on the environment has mostly been a negative one.
However, a recent study has found that not all of our energy projects damage the planet. In fact, some enable plant life to grow in what could only be described as “perfect conditions”, enabling a specific rare plant to multiply at an astonishing rate.
How can solar panels in the desert create these near-perfect conditions?
The climate disruption that has emerged over the past few decades can be directly attributed to our collective energy needs.
Fossil fuel-based energy generation is the primary contributor to climate change in modern-day society. We have learnt that it accounts for approximately 68% of global greenhouse gas emissions and roughly 90% of all CO2 emissions.
The conventional energy generation methods that we have relied on for generations have devastated wildlife and the very planet we live on.
Recent studies have found that traditional energy production releases toxic by-products into the atmosphere, such as mercury. This essentially poisons the wonderful world of wildlife that is essential to our ecosystem.
The overwhelming consensus among the international community is that the green energy transition needs to be accelerated to avert a global climate catastrophe.
We know that the ocean holds most of the excess heat that the planet produces, meaning that marine wildlife faces the risk of being boiled alive as the seas warm to unprecedented temperatures.
However, as the renewable energy subsector gains momentum, we are allowing the planet time to heal from decades of abuse from us as a society.
New revelations in energy technology have seen scientists creating innovative devices that are thinner than a strand of human hair. These flexible films can be applied to several energy-generating technologies or processes to increase efficiency and improve overall output capacity.
Solar power has become the dominant force in the renewable energy subsector as more of us turn to it to power our homes and reduce our carbon footprint.
We know that solar panel farms create exceedingly hot temperatures in their immediate surroundings. However, a recent study has found that these hotter-than-normal conditions are perfect for a rare plant to thrive and multiply.
Millions of people have turned to the solar panel industry to facilitate a reduction in their monthly electric bills; however, recent findings by a study led by Tiffany Pereira of the Desert Research Institute have found an unexpected and positive effect that the Gemini Solar Project has had on a specific plant.
The solar power sector has been developing a shift away from the traditional “blade-and-grade” method of constructing solar panel arrays.
The older method damages the soil underneath the solar arrays, potentially allowing invasive species of plant life to proliferate. The answer? Constructing what has been dubbed “ecovoltaic” solar panels.
Evidence found by the Desert Research Institute has noted that the huge solar array in the Mojave Desert helped to preserve the three-corner milkvetch plant.
The plant has grown by significant numbers in recent years. And what’s more amazing is that it has grown far taller and wider than normal specimens. Even producing more fruit than it normally would.
The solar panels also provide shade that slows down soil moisture evaporation.
So while some search for the next “new gold rush” in their backyards that will provide free energy, this study has found the “bright side” of solar power generation and how it can positively affect life, albeit plant life.
© 2026 by Ecoportal
© 2026 by Ecoportal

source

FRV gets consent for 183.6 MW solar projects in Spain  Renewables Now
source

Reviewing the top ten states for solar generation and capacity, energy storage buildout, and more.
Image: Michael Pointer, Unsplash
This report provides a comprehensive breakdown of the current U.S. solar and battery storage landscape based on the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). We examine state-level performance across four key metrics: generation share, cumulative capacity, future installation pipelines, and operational battery storage.
Solar share of total generation 
This metric tracks the percentage of a state’s total in-state electricity generation sourced from solar (utility-scale and estimated small-scale). 
Cumulative solar capacity 
Ranked by total installed megawatts (MW) of utility-scale solar capacity currently in operation. 
3-year installation forecast (2026–2028) 
Based on the EIA’s Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory, these states have the largest volume of utility-scale solar projects currently in the active three-year development queue. 
Percentage capacity growth forecast (2025–2026)  
While established markets lead in volume, these “emerging” states are seeing the largest relative surge in their existing solar footprint, often doubling or tripling their capacity from a small baseline. 
Operational battery storage capacity 
The U.S. utility-scale battery fleet has now surpassed 40 GW of power capacity. The following states lead in operational nameplate capacity (MW). 
Methodology 
All data is sourced from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Readers should note the following parameters regarding these figures: 
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from Ryan Kennedy
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
pv magazine USA offers daily updates of the latest photovoltaics news. We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.
Δ
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy © pv magazine 2026
Δ
Welcome to pv magazine USA. This site uses cookies. Read our policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source

Lessons Learned From Establishing a Rooftop Photovoltaic System Crowdsourced by Students and Employees at Aarhus University  onlinelibrary.wiley.com
source

Long‐Term Photovoltaic System Performance in Cold, Snowy Climates  onlinelibrary.wiley.com
source

Hildisrieden, LU – November 29, 2025 – PRESSADVANTAGE –
Oekoboiler Swiss AG, a Swiss manufacturer specializing in energy-efficient heat pump boilers, continues to advance sustainable hot water solutions through enhanced integration capabilities with photovoltaic systems across Switzerland. The company’s dual-energy technology combines heat pump efficiency with solar power compatibility, addressing growing demand for carbon-reduced heating solutions in residential and commercial buildings.
The company’s systems utilize a combination of ambient air and electricity to generate hot water, achieving up to 80 percent energy reduction compared to traditional heating methods. By extracting approximately 75 percent of required energy from ambient air and combining it with 25 percent electrical input, the technology produces complete hot water solutions while significantly reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

Oekoboiler Swiss AG designs and manufactures its products entirely in Switzerland, ensuring quality control throughout the development and production process. The systems feature smart control technology that enables seamless integration with existing photovoltaic installations, allowing property owners to utilize surplus solar energy for water heating purposes. This capability becomes particularly relevant as Switzerland continues its transition toward renewable energy sources and stricter building efficiency standards.
The heat pump boilers offer multiple configuration options, with storage capacities ranging from 150 to 450 liters to accommodate various building sizes and usage requirements. Each system operates independently from central heating installations, providing flexibility for both new construction projects and retrofitting existing buildings. The technology also provides additional benefits such as basement dehumidification, eliminating the need for separate moisture control equipment.
The company maintains a presence at https://oekoboiler-swiss-ag.localo.site for detailed product specifications and service information.
As Switzerland prepares for the implementation of EnEV 2025 energy efficiency regulations, Oekoboiler Swiss AG has positioned its products to meet and exceed upcoming standards. The company’s commitment to sustainable innovation extends beyond product development to include comprehensive planning, installation, and maintenance services throughout Switzerland.
The integration capabilities with photovoltaic systems represent a significant advancement in residential energy management. Property owners can program the systems to automatically utilize excess solar production during peak generation periods, optimizing energy consumption patterns and reducing reliance on grid electricity during high-demand periods.
Oekoboiler Swiss AG maintains its commitment to accessibility and customer engagement through multiple platforms. Additional information about the company’s sustainable hot water solutions can be found at https://pressadvantage.com/organization/oekoboiler-swiss-ag.

Based in Switzerland, Oekoboiler Swiss AG has established itself as a leading provider of energy-efficient water heating solutions since its founding. The company specializes in developing and manufacturing smart heat pump boilers that combine advanced technology with sustainable design principles. With a focus on quality, efficiency, and environmental responsibility, Oekoboiler Swiss AG serves residential and commercial clients throughout Switzerland. The company’s comprehensive approach includes consultation, system design, professional installation, and ongoing maintenance support. Customer location and service area information is available at https://maps.app.goo.gl/zBNNxGdCCBV7ZZ3C8.

###
For more information about Oekoboiler Swiss AG, contact the company here:
Oekoboiler Swiss AG
R. Heller
+41 41 511 21 77
info@oekoboiler.com
Mülacher 6
6024 Hildisrieden
Switzerland
Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. XPRMedia and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you are affiliated with this page and would like it removed please contact pressreleases@xpr.media
Dr. Mira Kaga spoke at a top aesthetics summit in NYC, joining national experts to discuss advanced treatments,
April 4, 2026
GA, UNITED STATES, April 4, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — Acupoints have long been viewed as fixed locations for
April 4, 2026
Authors Guild Foundation Gala, Apr 20 @ Cipriani Wall St: Percival Everett, Amy Tan & Dr. Carla Hayden honored.
April 4, 2026
A newly registered architecture is gaining commercial attention for translating real-time asset data into auditable,
April 4, 2026
A spring travel feature highlighting Page, Arizona as a seasonal destination and Antelope Air’s role in showcasing the
April 4, 2026
A Celebrated Actress, Devoted Mother, and Marine Veteran Remembered for Her Strength, Grace, and Lasting Impact Dee had
April 3, 2026
PEO4YOU founder applied prompt engineering and institutional data sources to build six benefits analysis tools in a
April 3, 2026
NAKNEK, AK, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — As fishing season approaches across Bristol Bay, Cama’i
April 3, 2026
Northern Arizona is experiencing a significant surge in tourism—particularly throughout the region known as the Grand
April 3, 2026
Free Saturday afternoon performances return to the dog-friendly patio every Saturday from April through October We love
April 3, 2026
Acquisition strengthens trailer and RV security offerings while accelerating product innovation and market expansion
April 3, 2026
DREXEL HILL, PA, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — SuccessBooks® is proud to announce a powerful new
April 3, 2026
BAYONNE, NJ, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — SuccessBooks® is proud to announce a powerful new
April 3, 2026
LOS ANGELES, CA, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — Singer songwriter Johnny Reed returns with his
April 3, 2026
FRANKLIN, TN, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — SuccessBooks® is proud to announce a powerful new
April 3, 2026
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CANADA, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — SuccessBooks® is proud to announce a powerful new
April 3, 2026
Advanced Urology completes 250 outpatient robotic procedures — same-day surgery, no hospital stay, by Atlanta's top
April 3, 2026
Advanced Urology founder Dr. Jitesh Patel brings histotripsy to Atlanta — a non-invasive, scalpel-free breakthrough for
April 3, 2026
TALLAHASSEE, FL, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — SuccessBooks® is proud to announce a powerful new
April 3, 2026
Coaching firm launches an outsourced marketing department, providing elite SEO, web design, and social media for a
April 3, 2026
A live, in-person, no-cost homebuyer Q&A designed to help Idahoans explore what’s possible in today’s market. We
April 3, 2026
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — CosmoInnovations, an Australian medtech and consumer health
April 3, 2026
Reno Computer Services (RCS) launches specialized Managed IT and Cybersecurity frameworks to ensure Reno businesses
April 3, 2026
Dr. Sterling’s work spans clinical medicine, community health, and global initiatives. He is a physician, public health
April 3, 2026
he Atlanta-based discount brokerage leverages cutting-edge entity SEO and data structuring to capture high-intent home
April 3, 2026
WILMINGTON, DE – April 03, 2026 – PRESSADVANTAGE – Nova Warranty announced today the expansion of its warranty coverage
April 3, 2026
LAS VEGAS, NV – April 03, 2026 – PRESSADVANTAGE – Recent market analysis from Zach WalkerLieb Summerlin Luxury Real
April 3, 2026
InfuCare Rx, Inc., and its affiliates and subsidiaries, clarifies that it has no affiliation with InfuCare, Ltd.,
April 3, 2026
Heritage Completes Transformational Branding and Environmental Graphics Project in Raleigh for the JD Lewis Center, a
April 3, 2026
BURLINGTON, VT, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — Sticky Brand has been awarded on the Financial Times
April 3, 2026
The annual visual arts exhibit features dynamic original works by Duke Ellington School of the Arts Visual Arts
April 3, 2026
SaleSumo Remains Phoenix’s No. 1 Liquidation Warehouse In Online Ranking At SaleSumo, our mission has always been
April 3, 2026
Built to help contractors, estimators, and project teams uncover design conflicts, missing scope, and costly issues
April 3, 2026
Maine’s flagship startup conference returns May 18–21 in Portland with nationally recognized speakers, expanded
April 3, 2026
LaSalle College Vancouver Partners With Canadian Armed Forces to Offer Fully Funded Culinary Arts Training This
April 3, 2026
A national initiative is transforming senior care: Artificial intelligence aging-in-place platforms that support rural
April 3, 2026
Surging demand for dedicated infra, hardware-level security, and predictable costs is driving a fundamental shift in
April 3, 2026
TX, UNITED STATES, April 3, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — Auto Champ of Texas, a trusted leader in manufacturing premium
April 3, 2026
The PSCA hosts events throughout the year where doctors and students grow together, strengthen their purpose, and build
April 3, 2026
Wheelock Family Theatre announces its 2026/2027 season, marking its 46th year of producing dynamic, multigenerational
April 3, 2026

source

Your support helps PBS News remain present, persistent and independent.
Laura Klivans, KQED Laura Klivans, KQED
Leave your feedback
For years, solar power at home was mostly limited to people who owned their rooftops and could afford the steep upfront costs. But now, a new generation of small, affordable systems — often called “plug-in” solar — are making clean energy more accessible. Already widespread in Germany, the movement is gaining momentum in the United States. Laura Klivans of PBS member station KQED reports.
Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.
John Yang:
For years, solar power at home was mostly limited to people who owned their rooftops and could afford the steep upfront costs. But that's changing. A new generation of small, affordable systems, often called plug in solar, are making clean energy more accessible. The technology is already widespread in Germany and the movement is gaining momentum in the United States. Our report is from Laura Klivans of PBS member station KQED in San Francisco.
Laura Klivans:
Agnes Chan is a retired teacher in Berkeley, California. She wanted to install solar panels on her home construction, but was limited by her fixed income budget.
Agnes Chan, Plug-in Solar User:
I've lived for a long time and even consulted my roofer, but there's no way that I can afford that.
Laura Klivans:
So she found a cheaper workaround and is one of the newest adopters of plug-in solar. She hopes to rein in bills that run into the hundreds, even with a thermostat set to 60.
Agnes Chan:
It's a great house that I have lived in for over 35 years, but there's no way to insulate it. So I'm shivering in my own house.
Laura Klivans:
Instead of tens of thousands of dollars for rooftop solar, Jan's setup costs $400 and took less than an hour to install.
Agnes Chan:
This is the app which will show me how much the panel is generating.
Laura Klivans:
And rather than taking a decade or so to pay it back, it will likely take her two to three years.
Cora Stryker, Co-Founder, Bright Saver:
We are systematically removing the barriers.
Laura Klivans:
Cora Stryker Co leads the nonprofit that provided Chan with her panels. They bring plug in solar to renters, plus people in multifamily housing and other Americans shut out of rooftop systems.
Cora Stryker:
These things are modular. They're tiny. You can put them just about anywhere. You can add on as time goes on so it's less big. Upfront investment all at once.
Woman:
Introducing Gizmo Power's patented mobile electricity generator.
Laura Klivans:
From plug in carports to balconies, entrepreneurs are investing in this emerging market.
Man:
Now that you've seen the possibilities for installations in various scenarios.
Laura Klivans:
But there's a major hurdle to widespread adoption. In most of the U.S. it's not legal to just set up these systems and plug them in as envisioned.
Man:
Our next topic on the agenda so called plug in Solar.
Laura Klivans:
At a recent online forum hosted by California's utility regulator, Eamon Hoffman, who works for the state's largest utility, PG&E, said customers must comply with regulations and pay fees as if they were setting up a rooftop system.
Utilities say that helps them manage energy supply and demand. But plug in solar advocates say their systems should have a simpler registration process.
Bill Brooks, Brooks Engineering:
This is the world headquarters of Brooks Engineering.
Laura Klivans:
We asked an independent expert to weigh in.
Bill Brooks:
These panels were from early 1980s.
Laura Klivans:
Bill Brooks is an electrical engineer who specialized in Solar for 37 years. He helped write California's code that governs how solar connects to the grid.
Bill Brooks:
There are 78 solar panels. I call it my solar garden.
Laura Klivans:
He says there are risks to plug in solar.
Bill Brooks:
If the product didn't have the proper certifications, then there would be the possibility that somebody could energize a downed power line that could injure linemen.
Laura Klivans:
But Brooks says the barriers can be overcome by updating existing tools.
Bill Brooks:
This is a microinverter used in things like plug in Solar and it has a certification and we have the National Electrical Code.
Laura Klivans:
When these safeguards are in place, Brooks doesn't see a need for a lengthy or costly registration. And he says independent organizations are working on a safety standard for the technology.
Man:
We dropship this to our customers, but.
Laura Klivans:
Plug in solar companies and their customers aren't waiting for regulators.
Man:
Here's the instructions.
Laura Klivans:
Bay Area resident Joe Tenenbaum considered rooftop solar when his electricity bills started rising.
Joe Tenenbaum, Plug-in Solar User:
A good amount of sun even from the morning on, and then it's going to move.
Laura Klivans:
But it would require replacing the roof too. And costs quickly ballooned.
Joe Tenenbaum:
And we don't own this house. This is my parents' home. My wife and kids and I moved in with them when my mom got sick. It's not feasible for them to make $100,000 investment in a rooftop system and it isn't either for us.
Laura Klivans:
Tenenbaum liked the idea that they'd be able to take their panels with them if they moved. For $1,600, he bought an 800 watt DIY kit from Craftstrom.
Joe Tenenbaum:
All right, should we build it?
Man:
Yep.
Laura Klivans:
He liked how they built safety measures into their technology. The company also advises customers to register their systems. The panels won't power the whole house, but will keep Tenenbaum's refrigerator humming and small appliances charged. He expects to save five to on his monthly utility bill.
Man:
So it can grow with your energy.
Laura Klivans:
Craftstrom co-founders and brothers Michael and Steven Scherer say demand for plug-in solar is growing.
Michael Scherer, COO, Craftstrom:
Especially here in California. People are telling us about the time of use rates that double as they come home and actually use power.
Michael Scherer:
And then the second motivation is becoming part of the Green Revolution.
Woman:
House Bill 340 —
Laura Klivans:
Legislators across the country are taking note.
Raymond Ward (R) Utah State Representative: We know there are safe just because they've been doing this for three or four years now and it's worked out well in Europe.
Laura Klivans:
Earlier this year, Utah passed the first legislation nationwide that will allow plug-in solar with no registration when certain safety standards and codes are set. Similar legislation is in the works in several other states, including New York, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Vermont.
Agnes Chan:
My panel is producing 645 watts per hour.
Laura Klivans:
As for Agnes Chan in California, she's hoping to stay warmer this winter.
Agnes Chan:
I expect to be comfortable instead of shivering in my own house wearing a down jacket and a blanket to watch TV.
Laura Klivans:
Even if everyone in the U.S. had these panels, plug-in solar could only cover a slice of national energy demand. But experts say every bit of renewable energy counts.
Joe Tenenbaum:
Big moment here. I'm very excited about this new system. Just unboxing it felt like opening up a gift. We have solar.
Michael Scherer:
That's all there is to it.
Laura Klivans:
For PBS News Weekend, I'm Laura Klivans in Northern California.
Watch the Full Episode
Dec 07
By PBS News Weekend
Dec 07
By Ali Rogin, Zoie Lambert, Satvi Sunkara
Laura Klivans, KQED Laura Klivans, KQED
Support Provided By: Learn more
Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
© 1996 – 2026 NewsHour Productions LLC. All Rights Reserved.
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Sections
About
Stay Connected
Subscribe to Here’s the Deal with Lisa Desjardins
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
Support for News Hour Provided By

source

We use cookies to improve your experience and for marketing. Read our cookie policy or manage cookies.
Search across reports, market insights, and blog stories.
Solar manufacturer Qcells is establishing a new division focused on integrated home energy systems for the residential construction sector in the United States. The new unit, named Qcells New Homes, will collaborate with homebuilders to include solar generation and battery storage in newly constructed properties.
The company stated that this initiative responds to increasing electricity costs for households and worries about the dependability of the power grid. A central feature of the platform is a leasing model aimed at making adoption easier. This structure is intended to decrease initial expenses for builders and allow homeowners to obtain the systems without impacting their debt-to-income ratios, which can influence mortgage approvals. Monthly lease payments are described as being lower than average utility rates and are fixed, which protects customers from potential future increases in energy prices.
The platform will function as a direct provider of solar and storage solutions from the manufacturer. It will supply solar modules manufactured at its facility in Georgia alongside battery systems produced domestically. The offering also encompasses financing, installation, and ongoing monitoring services.
The president of Qcells New Homes, Phil Narodick, noted that the approach removes intermediaries to deliver American-assembled solar panels directly to new housing developments. He added that the team has extensive experience working with the homebuilding industry and provides an integrated solution meant to optimize system performance and homeowner value, particularly as net metering policies change, while managing energy solutions throughout a project’s duration.
Integrated battery storage is part of the offering, allowing households to store solar energy and, in certain areas, send electricity back to the grid. This feature corresponds with policy structures like California’s Net Energy Metering 3.0, which encourage self-consumption and grid support. The systems also provide backup power during outages.
This report provides a comprehensive view of the ac/dc motor industry in the United States, tracking demand, supply, and trade flows across the national value chain. It explains how demand across key channels and end-use segments shapes consumption patterns, while also mapping the role of input availability, production efficiency, and regulatory standards on supply.
Beyond headline metrics, the study benchmarks prices, margins, and trade routes so you can see where value is created and how it moves between domestic suppliers and international partners. The analysis is designed to support strategic planning, market entry, portfolio prioritization, and risk management in the ac/dc motor landscape in the United States.
The report combines market sizing with trade intelligence and price analytics for the United States. It covers both historical performance and the forward outlook to 2035, allowing you to compare cycles, structural shifts, and policy impacts.
This report provides a consistent view of market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States. The profile highlights demand structure and trade position, enabling benchmarking against regional and global peers.
The analysis is built on a multi-source framework that combines official statistics, trade records, company disclosures, and expert validation. Data are standardized, reconciled, and cross-checked to ensure consistency across time series.
All data are normalized to a common product definition and mapped to a consistent set of codes. This ensures that comparisons across time are aligned and actionable.
The forecast horizon extends to 2035 and is based on a structured model that links ac/dc motor demand and supply to macroeconomic indicators, trade patterns, and sector-specific drivers. The model captures both cyclical and structural factors and reflects known policy and technology shifts in the United States.
Each projection is built from national historical patterns and the broader regional context, allowing the report to show where growth is concentrated and where risks are elevated.
Prices are analyzed in detail, including export and import unit values, regional spreads, and changes in trade costs. The report highlights how seasonality, freight rates, exchange rates, and supply disruptions influence pricing and margins.
Key producers, exporters, and distributors are profiled with a focus on their operational scale, geographic footprint, product mix, and market positioning. This helps identify competitive pressure points, partnership opportunities, and routes to differentiation.
This report is designed for manufacturers, distributors, importers, wholesalers, investors, and advisors who need a clear, data-driven picture of ac/dc motor dynamics in the United States.
The market size aggregates consumption and trade data, presented in both value and volume terms.
The projections combine historical trends with macroeconomic indicators, trade dynamics, and sector-specific drivers.
Yes, it includes export and import unit values, regional spreads, and a pricing outlook to 2035.
The report benchmarks market size, trade balance, prices, and per-capita indicators for the United States.
Yes, it highlights demand hotspots, trade routes, pricing trends, and competitive context.
Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business
A Quick Overview of Market Performance
Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects
Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business
Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain
Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export
The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry
The Largest Import Supplying Countries
The Largest Destinations for Exports
The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.
IndexBox, Inc.
2093 Philadelphia Pike #1441
Claymont, DE 19703, USA
Contact us
© 2026 IndexBox, Inc
Instant access. No credit card needed.
Online access to 2M+ reports, dashboards, and tables. Trusted by Fortune 500 teams.

source

Home
China
World
Business
Sport
Special Coverage
双语
Home China World Business Sport Special Coverage 双语
The export tax rebate adjustment for photovoltaic and battery products, which took effect on Apr. 1, will support sustainable growth of the industry, despite some short-term fluctuations, experts told China.org.cn.

A partial view of the Shichengzi photovoltaic power station in Hami, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Jan. 6, 2025. [Photo by Xinhua]
China's Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration announced on Jan. 9 that the export tax rebates for value-added tax on photovoltaic products would be canceled starting from Apr. 1.
Meanwhile, the rebate rate for battery products would be reduced from 9% to 6% and eliminated entirely starting Jan. 1, 2027.
"This adjustment responds to the international community's concern about our photovoltaic products, as many countries have imposed tariffs," said Bai Ming, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation. "Canceling export tax rebates helps ease the situation we face in the international market."
Luo Weijie, associate professor of economics at Beijing International Studies University, pointed out that the change will reduce fiscal burden, demonstrating China's confidence in its photovoltaic and battery companies.
"It shows that they can compete independently in the market, considering their significant global share," Luo explained.
The export tax rebate adjustment for photovoltaic and battery products has caused some fluctuations in the industry. According to InfoLink Consulting's latest photovoltaic industry chain price report, policy expectations have pushed up module prices in multiple regions.
Following the January announcement, leading Chinese solar module manufacturers, including Trina Solar and Jinko Solar, have raised their product prices.
"This represents a structural impact," Bai said. "We will phase out unviable enterprises that rely solely on export tax rebates for survival, while supporting competitive firms that can boost added value through innovation."
Luo added that the policy will compress margins for Chinese new energy exporters in the short term, with larger firms able to share costs while smaller companies will bear the full burden.
At a seminar hosted by the China Photovoltaic Industry Association (CPIA) on Feb. 5, consultant Wang Bohua stated that the industry is moving from export tax rebates to a market-driven phase, from involution-style competition to high-quality competition.
While this shift may pose short-term challenges, Wang believes it will ultimately encourage technological innovation and improve the competitive landscape in the long run, enhancing the sustainability of China's photovoltaic sector in the global market.
"We should strive for mutually beneficial interactions that lead to win-win results in the global market," Bai added.
Follow China.org.cn
China.org.cn Newsletter: Subscribe for Free.
About | Contact | Careers

source

Chinese panels still have edge on tech and reputation despite end of export rebate
Workers check the quality of a solar panel at a ReNew manufacturing plant on the outskirts of Jaipur in India.  © AP
BENGALURU — India's solar industry is struggling to find new export markets — a pressing need amid growing overcapacity issues and punishing U.S. tariffs — even as it narrows the price gap with Chinese panels.

source