Solar tracker maker Array Technologies plunges by 34% in Thursday trading – Mugglehead Investment Magazine

Hi, what are you looking for?
The company’s EBITDA guidance for 2026 fell well below analyst expectations
By
Published
New Mexico-based Array Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: ARRY) (FRA: 9AY) took a hard hit on the Nasdaq Thursday. Shares fell 34 per cent after the company released mixed results for the fourth quarter of 2025.
Investors sold off quickly because the numbers disappointed on profits even though sales beat forecasts. The company posted US$226 million in revenue for the quarter, which topped consensus expectations of about US$212 million.
For the full year, revenue jumped 40 per cent to US$1.28 billion, propelled by 35 per cent more tracker shipments and the recent APA Solar acquisition. This deal, valued at US$179 million, augmented Array’s portfolio with fixed-tilt mounting/racking systems for solar projects.
The main factor causing Thursday’s slide, however, was the solar tracker tech specialist’s 2026 guidance. Adjusted EBITDA is slated to hit approximately US$215 million, well below the US$250 million or more Wall Street analysts were hoping for. Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) (FRA: DBK) dropped its share target for Array by US$2 to US$9 this week as a result of this and unfavourable margins.
Adjusted earnings per share came in at a loss of one cent, far below the modest profit analysts wanted. Moreover, fourth quarter revenue declined by US$49 million year-over-year to US$226 million and adjusted EBITDA hit a low margin of approximately 5 per cent at US$11.2 million. The full year adjusted gross margin declined by 7.1 per cent year-over-year to 27 per cent.
The company reported a much larger US$161 million GAAP net loss for the quarter mainly because of two big accounting charges: a US$103 million non-cash write-down of goodwill (an accounting adjustment for overpaying in a past acquisition) and a US$30 million reduction in the value of inventory after deciding to phase out some older products.
Array Technologies builds solar trackers for big utility-scale solar farms. These steel structures hold rows of solar panels and use motors to tilt them so they always face the sun as it moves across the sky.
Fixed panels sit still all day, but trackers follow the light. That extra movement squeezes up to 25 per cent more electricity from the same panels. The trackers also cut long-term costs, install fast and can stand up to hail, high winds, and snow.
Newer models like DuraTrack and OmniTrack add smart software called SmarTrack that uses weather data to squeeze even more power and protect the system.
The company’s significant drop this week highlights bigger problems the Array battles. Tariffs have raised part costs. Furthermore, benefits from past tax credits are fading and squeezing margins by several points.
Supply chain issues and competition from other trackers are adding pressure too. Nextpower Inc (NASDAQ: NXT), China’s Arctech Solar Holding Co Ltd (SHA: 688408) and Spanish operator Soltec Power Holdings SA (BME: SOL) (FRA: 5PZ) are Array’s top competitors.
Array also carries heavy debt from earlier deals, and international markets like Brazil and Spain have been moving slower than hoped for the company.
The stock plunge shows how quickly investors punish any softness in profits, even when demand for clean energy trackers stays strong.
Read more: Duke Energy Florida uses solar-made hydrogen to reinvent gas power
 
Follow Mugglehead on X
Like Mugglehead on Facebook
Follow Rowan Dunne on X
Follow Rowan Dunne on LinkedIn
rowan@mugglehead.com
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *







The bill must still pass the Senate and clear both chambers before it reaches the president’s desk
They are all burnt out and demanding better treatment
Gold and silver stocks dominated in the rankings this year
It is the only major American company producing advanced memory chips at scale
Mugglehead Media Corp. © 2024

source

This entry was posted in Renewables. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply