Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
Swipe for next article
The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. If you submit a form or click links to other sites on this page, we will earn commission. 
These small systems are no substitute for full rooftop solar, but they could open the door to renters, flat owners and households, says Jeff Meyer
Removed from bookmarks
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Solar has long been sold as a home upgrade for people with the right kind of home: a decent roof, enough money upfront and the confidence to commit to a full installation. In other words, not everyone.
That’s why the latest news on plug-in solar panels is so interesting. On one level, it’s easy to focus on the novelty value of Lidl and other high-street retailers selling solar panels in the middle aisle as an everyday purchase. But the more interesting story is what sits underneath it. Solar is starting to shrink, not in ambition, but in format. It is becoming cheaper, simpler, and potentially available to people who have mostly been locked out of the conversation until now.
For years, rooftop solar panels have mostly been a product for owner-occupiers with the right roof, a big budget and the confidence to commit to a proper installation. If you had a south-facing roof, plan to stay put for a while and are willing to spend thousands upfront, solar could make a lot of sense. But for all its appeal, rooftop solar has tended to feel like an option for the few rather than the many.
In practice, the usual solar conversation has excluded lots of people: renters, flat owners, those with small outdoor spaces but no real roof to work with, and households that like the idea of generating some of their own electricity, but have never been in the market for a full system. For them, solar has often felt less like a practical option than a sensible thing other people do. Plug-in solar could begin to change that.
That doesn’t mean it will transform the economics of home energy overnight. It will not. The systems now being discussed for the UK are small in terms of their output capability, and hence so are the likely savings. Anyone hoping for a plug-in miracle that wipes out a chunk of their electricity bill is likely to be disappointed. Amid all the excitement, we should be clear that these devices are not a substitute for a full rooftop system, and they are certainly not a substitute for wider action on energy bills, insulation or the cost of heating homes.
But I do think plug-in solar panels represent something important all the same.
For one thing, they make solar look less like a renovation project and more like a normal consumer purchase. And that is an important cultural shift. Heat pumps are still a major decision. Full solar installations are still a major decision. Home batteries, for most households, are still a major decision. They all involve quotes, installers, disruption and big upfront sums. Plug-in solar hints at a different kind of energy technology that’s smaller, cheaper, lower-commitment, and perhaps easier for more people to imagine themselves actually buying.
That shift in perception is not trivial. Technologies often change the market long before they transform the numbers. Sometimes the big breakthrough isn’t a product becoming dramatically more powerful, but rather it becomes more familiar, affordable and ordinary so people stop seeing it as something specialist.
That is why I think the democratising case for plug-in solar is real, even if the headline savings are modest.
If you rent a home with a balcony or own a flat with some usable outdoor space, the appeal is obvious. A smaller setup that lets you generate at least some of your own electricity is a very different proposition. It lowers the barrier to entry and offers a version of self-generation that feels less exclusive. This resonates with people because the energy transition has not always felt especially democratic.
Too often, the technologies that make homes cheaper to run are the ones that require the most money, control and permanence to install, and the households that would most benefit from lower bills aren’t always the ones with the easiest route to solar, batteries or deep retrofit work. This is perhaps the biggest reason why public enthusiasm for green technology can feel uneven. People are often asked to get excited about systems that are plainly out of reach for most of us.
Plug-in solar does not solve that problem, but it does at least point in a better direction. It’s a first step and suggests a world in which home energy technology isn’t only for people embarking on expensive projects. It opens up a new market in which smaller, simpler products can coexist with full installations and give millions of people the confidence that self-generation is something ordinary households can join in with, even on a small scale. But the caveats all apply.
The UK should be careful not to oversell this. Plug-in offerings will not make every home suitable for solar. It will not deliver the same savings as a larger rooftop array. Not every property will have the right outdoor space, sunlight or permissions. And there is always a risk with new consumer energy products that the hype runs ahead of the practical reality.
That is especially true with anything presented as cheap and easy. In energy, cheap and easy can quickly be mistaken for universally useful. But home energy is rarely that simple. What works well in one property may be pointless in another. The best way to think about plug-in solar is not as a universal answer, but as a new option for homes that have previously had very few.
That, to me, is what is most significant about this news. It presents an opportunity to widen access to a technology that has so far been shaped around a relatively narrow vision of who the energy transition is for. And in the long run, that may prove just as significant as the number of kilowatt-hours it produces.
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

source