CT Mirror
Connecticut's Nonprofit Journalism. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Nonprofit and hyperlocal news organizations are welcome to republish CT Mirror stories and opinion pieces at no charge. If you do republish CT Mirror content we ask that you follow a few guidelines:
- You must use the HTML code below (including the Canonical code).
- You must include a byline, ideally in this format: “by Ginny Monk, CT Mirror.”
- Access to CT Mirror content that you republish must remain free. You may not sell access to this article, place it behind a paywall, or grant downstream publication rights to other publishers.
- You must receive approval from CT Mirror Publisher Bruce Putterman prior to re-publishing your first CT Mirror story.
- See additional Republishing Guidelines, including conditions by which you may make small changes to story content, here.
by John Moritz, CT Mirror
July 15, 2026
This story has been updated.
As large solar arrays have proliferated across Connecticut in the last decade, so have questions about how much tax revenue local governments can draw from the fields of panels.
For years, state law gave municipalities and their tax assessors the leeway to determine the value of solar panels and other equipment subject to personal property taxes. At the same time, developers could seek a variety of tax exemptions on their projects allowing them to drastically reduce — or in some cases eliminate — their local tax obligations.
Towns have faced challenges even with projects that don’t qualify for tax exemptions, because the value of solar panels tends to depreciate quickly. In some cases that’s left towns with budgetary holes to fill in the years following a project’s initial installation.
As a result, litigation has erupted in some towns over tax bills for solar projects. Fearing financial uncertainty, both developers and municipal leaders have negotiated deals to stabilize their tax payments and provide more predictability to both parties. They’ve also appealed to lawmakers for a long-term solution.
After several failed attempts to address the issue, lawmakers passed an omnibus energy bill during the 2025 legislative session that includes a new calculation for levying taxes on large solar arrays.
The law, which applies to commercial solar facilities that commence operation after July 1, 2026, creates a uniform tax of $10,000 a year for every megawatt of electricity the panels are capable of producing. For example, an averaged-sized facility with an installed capacity of 6 megawatts would pay $60,000 in annual taxes to the town in which it is located.
The uniform capacity tax, as it’s known, only applies to large, ground-mounted solar arrays with an output of over 1 megawatt. (Most residential rooftop systems, for example, are between 5 and 10 kilowatts in size and are exempt from property taxes.)
The author of the policy was state Rep. Jamie Foster, D-Ellington, whose district in the Connecticut River Valley is home to several of the state’s largest solar arrays.
Under the new system, Foster said that most commercial solar developers will no longer be eligible for broad exemptions from local property taxes (including those for distributed energy systems). But when taxes are easier to calculate, she said, it’s simpler for developers to project future costs and secure financing for their projects.
It’s not that commercial developers are all trying to avoid paying local taxes, Foster said. They just want to know exactly what their tax liability will be, so they’re not surprised after the fact, she said.
The uniform capacity tax applies for 20 years, during which time solar developers will be exempt from paying personal property taxes on the equipment. The land underneath the array is still subject to local real estate taxes.
The law exempts arrays built on state-owned land, brownfields, landfills, solar canopies or systems that are designed to power certain critical facilities such as a hospital or police station.
Despite widespread support for a more uniform tax structure, talks in the legislature stalled for years as developers and local officials debated the exact tax rate commercial solar projects should face.
In 2021, state Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, introduced legislation proposing a flat, $5,000-per-megawatt tax on commercial solar arrays. While Rhode Island already had a similar law charging the same rate for solar facilities, Osten said the idea failed to gain traction in Connecticut.
“I don’t think people understood the concept of it, and nobody had had the experience,” Osten said. “I think it took a long time to get people’s interest on it.”
The following year, lawmakers tucked language into a broader energy bill requiring the Office of Policy and Management to conduct a study of taxes that are applicable to commercial solar projects. That report, released in 2023, highlighted the number of legal disputes over tax exemptions and called for a more “clear and consistent framework.”
Over the next several years, Foster said negotiations over setting a flat tax ranged from the initial $5,000-per-megawatt proposal to some as high as $13,000-per-megawatt. By 2025, the two sides were able to meet at around $10,000, according to multiple people involved in the discussions.
“I think it was really tied to figuring out what that number should be that created the delay,” said Will Herchel, chief executive at West Hartford solar developer Verogy.
The idea gained the support of East Windsor First Selectman Jason Bowsza, whose town is home to the largest concentration of commercial solar arrays in Connecticut, with seven facilities either active or under development.
Bowsza said the town was able to negotiate a tax stabilization agreement with one developer; another developer agreement was worked out via court settlement. Bowsza said five other projects qualified for exemptions allowing them to pay no property taxes.
Earlier this year, Bowsza and other local officials successfully lobbied lawmakers to pass a moratorium on new solar development in East Windsor and neighboring Enfield due to frustrations over the amount of land being turned over to developers, in addition to the loss of revenue from tax-exempt projects.
But for other towns that are just starting to field interest from solar developers, having a standard tax rate will make it easier for local officials to determine whether or not a specific project is in the best interest of the town — and its finances — Bowsza said.
It’ll be easier to compare the revenue a town currently receives from a given property against what it would receive if solar were installed there, Bowsza said. “They can then decide based on looking at those numbers whether or not they want to contest an application.”
During the 2026 legislative session, before the new tax went into effect, lawmakers made a last-minute fix to it. A drafting error in the original legislation had exempted some existing projects from having to pay personal property taxes.
Foster said the inadvertent exemption applied to around six projects. The fix, which was included H.B. 5442, subjected those projects to the uniform capacity tax starting in 2026 and lasting for 19 years — as opposed to 20 for those projects that commence operations this year.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Will Herchel, the chief executive at Verogy.
We hold our newsroom to a high standard — in quality of stories, ethical practices, depth of knowledge on their beats, transparency, and impact of the journalism. We like to think that it is a bar any other outlet should strive to meet, too.
We just set a new bar by winning the Pulitzer Prize for Local Reporting.
The award is a crowning achievement sitting atop a mountain of substantive impact, including change spurred by the On the Hook series that was recognized. It woke up public officials to the festering practice of towing and quickly selling people’s cars before their owners could hope to get them back. The story immediately changed the law that allowed it to happen (as immediate as government can move).
That’s what you get from CT Mirror: high caliber, high impact journalism.
The newsroom didn’t begin their multi-year investigation into the towing industry with a thought that it would win them a Pulitzer, but they did know they had something momentous that could reshape public policy.
For every long-term investigation that didn’t win a Pulitzer, many still could have for the level of reporting we did and the changes in lives and laws that came from them.
When you donate, you become part of publishing the stories and creating the impact. Recurring support ensures CT Mirror continues delivering the accountability journalism Connecticut needs — now and for years to come.
Thank you.
John covers energy and the environment for CT Mirror, a beat that has taken him from wind farms off the coast of Block Island to foraging for mushrooms in the Litchfield Hills and many places in between. Prior to joining CT Mirror, he was a statewide reporter for the Hearst Connecticut Media Group and before that, he covered politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in Little Rock. A native of Norwalk, John earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and political science from Temple University.
Support Pulitzer Prize-winning journalism.
Donate to CT Mirror today.
A Pulitzer Prize-winning investigation requires reporters and supporters to step up every day. Every month. Every year.
Join 9,300 Connecticut voters who read The Issue, a weekly politics newsletter.
