Fears for walkers and cyclists as 850 HGV movements planned for solar farm build – Darlington & Stockton Times

Share
Critics of a controversial solar scheme in North Yorkshire say 11 temporary passing places proposed on narrow country roads to accommodate construction traffic would do little to protect walkers, cyclists and horse riders.
The Stop Stell Solar Farm Action Group says the proposed road widening would help large lorries pass each other but would offer limited protection to more vulnerable road users.
The concerns follow revised highways proposals submitted by developer Enviromena Project Management UK Ltd for the 30MW Stell Solar Farm development on 113 acres of fields at Lord’s Moor Farm, near Exelby, east of Bedale.
The plans include six passing places along Lord’s Lane, where the carriageway narrows to just 2.57 metres in places, two on Westfield Lane, two on the B6285 and one on an unnamed road.
The developer says the additional passing places are necessary to allow large construction vehicles, including articulated lorries up to 16.5 metres long, to pass oncoming traffic safely without having to reverse.
Its highways consultants, Motion, say the proposals have been developed following concerns from North Yorkshire Council highways officers about insufficient road widths, poor visibility and the lack of suitable passing opportunities.
According to the revised highways report, the passing bays would widen sections of Lord’s Lane to between six and 6.5 metres, allowing two heavy goods vehicles to pass safely.
The developer says their locations have been selected to provide adequate visibility between passing points and reduce the risk of vehicles meeting where there is insufficient room to manoeuvre.
It also maintains that the widening can be accommodated within the existing highway boundary without removing hedgerows, although some trimming would be required.
Motion argues that the passing places, together with temporary speed restrictions, warning signs, traffic lights and the use of traffic marshals where necessary, would provide a more reliable way of managing construction vehicles.
It says the measures would also help protect walkers, cyclists and horse riders by improving visibility, reducing vehicle conflicts and requiring drivers to give priority to vulnerable road users.
However, the campaign group’s highways consultant, Bruce Bamber, of Railton TPC, disputes whether the proposals adequately address those concerns.
He said: “The applicant has undertaken no surveys of non-motorised users (NMUs) on Lord’s Lane.
“It therefore remains impossible to reliably assess the impact of construction traffic on vulnerable highway users for whom passing places offer little protection over much of the length of the lane.”
Mr Bamber also questioned the visibility between some of the proposed passing places, arguing that lorry drivers travelling south could pass one bay without being able to see whether another vehicle was approaching beyond the next.
He raised concerns that roadside ditches had not been identified in the plans and that widening works could require culverts and damage existing hedgerows.
The revised proposals also include temporary 30mph speed limits at three junctions and three-way traffic lights at the junction of Lord’s Lane and the B6285.
However, Mr Bamber questioned whether the speed restrictions would be effective, pointing to earlier comments from highways officers that lower limits without sufficient justification could be ignored by motorists.
Read more
Controversial 126-acre solar farm to be reconsidered after High Court challenge
North Yorkshire sports centre plans 44 new parking spaces as visits to rise by 50,000
Call for Yorkshire Water to return to public ownership after 335 pollution incidents

The development is expected to generate approximately 850 two-way HGV movements during a 36-week construction period, with up to 25 movements a day during the busiest two to three weeks.
Motion concludes that the revised construction route is suitable and that the proposed measures would avoid unacceptable impacts on road safety.
North Yorkshire Council’s highways authority has subsequently withdrawn its objection, subject to conditions.
Share
This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation’s Editors’ Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here
© 2001-2026. The Darlington and Stockton Times is owned and operated by Newsquest Media Group Ltd, an audited local newspaper network.
Visit newsquest.co.uk to view our policies, terms and legal agreements.
The Echo Building, 18 Albert Road, Bournemouth, England BH1 1BZ. Registered in England & Wales | 01676637
Data returned from the Piano ‘meterActive/meterExpired’ callback event.
As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles.
Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services.
These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community.
It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times.

source

This entry was posted in Renewables. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply