About 95 percent of a solar panel can be recycled and 3 quarters of its weight is plain glass, and close to 9 in 10 retired panels still go into an American landfill – Energies Media

Energies Media
A pallet of modules comes off a repowered array with the glass unbroken and the frames bright.
Almost everything on that pallet is technically recoverable, and the industry has known how to do it for years.
A truck takes it to a hole in the ground anyway.
The reason is not that nobody can take these things apart. It is what the pieces are worth once they come apart.
By weight a crystalline solar panel is mostly window. Glass is 70 to 76 percent of it.
Polymer layers account for another ten or eleven, the aluminum frame for eight to thirteen, and the silicon that does the actual work for three to five.
Copper comes in near one percent. Silver, the conductor that carries current off the cell, sits below a tenth of one percent.
Where recyclers do the work, recovery rates are not bad. Copper and aluminum come back above 95 percent, glass around 90, silver and silicon somewhere between eighty and the high nineties.
So the mass is separable and the metals are reachable.
The trouble is that three quarters of what you must collect, freight and process is a low value commodity, and the money is hiding in a trace that weighs less than a paperclip in each module you handle.
Open a lithium ion cell and the difficulty is structural rather than economic.
On one side powdered graphite is bonded to copper foil. On the other, powdered lithium metal oxides are fixed to aluminum foil.
Pulling those layers apart without cross contamination is hard, and aluminum flecks in recovered lithium ruin the value of the output.
There is also no standard shape to design a line around. Cells arrive as cylinders, as flexible pouches or as rigid prismatic cases, and each needs its own handling.
The recovered cobalt, nickel, lithium and copper come off as fine powders that are awkward to handle safely, and the risk of thermal runaway during teardown forces slow, careful protocols that cost money.
Most of a turbine is scrap metal in the good sense. The steel tower, the copper windings, the gearbox and generator inside the nacelle are routinely salvaged.
The blade is different by design. Glass and carbon fiber are laid into a mold alongside balsa wood or foam cores, then infused with liquid thermoset resin under vacuum.
Thermoset resins cure into permanent cross links. There is no melting the material back into a usable feedstock, which is why decommissioned blades get ground into low grade filler or buried whole.
Cumulative American blade waste is put at roughly four million tons by mid century.
That is a real problem and a genuinely small one beside the rest of the waste stream. It is also the only part of this story where the word impossible comes close to accurate, and it is the part that gets the least engineering money.
Cadmium telluride is usually treated as an exotic corner case that makes everything harder. In America it is not a corner case at all.
It held 21 percent of the United States market a few years ago, and on utility scale sites an aging layer of it now covers more than a third of the fleet.
More than 90 percent of one of those modules can be recycled, according to federal figures, and its principal maker has run a closed loop take back program for decades.
The toxicity worry is real, but it is a worry about burial.
Leaching tests show cadmium and tellurium coming out of crushed cells under acidic landfill conditions, which is an argument for recycling rather than against the technology, and the opposite of how the risk usually gets described.
Close to nine in ten retired modules still go to landfill in the United States, and roughly 95 percent of the material in them is recoverable.
Those two facts side by side are the whole story.
More than thirty American recyclers already accept panels. The largest operators worldwide handle somewhere between a thousand and fifty thousand tons a year each, according to an industry sheet.
The wave has not landed yet either. The average American turbine was about nine years old at last count, which leaves time that is not being used well.
Better chemistry helps at the margin, and recyclable blade materials would remove the one truly stubborn piece.
The rest of it turns on freight and scale rather than on anything a laboratory can invent, and neither of those gets solved by waiting for the volume to arrive.
Kelly is an experienced writer with 15 years of experience exploring the big stories that shape our world, from tech breakthroughs and space exploration to climate, energy, and the fascinating quirks of science. She has a talent for turning complex ideas into sharp, memorable insights that stay with readers long after they’ve finished reading.
Kelly is an experienced writer with 15 years of experience exploring the big stories that shape our world, from tech breakthroughs and space exploration to climate, energy, and the fascinating quirks of science. She has a talent for turning complex ideas into sharp, memorable insights that stay with readers long after they’ve finished reading.
Kelly is an experienced writer with 15 years of experience exploring the big stories that shape our world, from tech breakthroughs and space exploration to climate, energy, and the fascinating quirks of science. She has a talent for turning complex ideas into sharp, memorable insights that stay with readers long after they’ve finished reading.

source

This entry was posted in Renewables. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply