A research team led by the University of Science and Technology of China has developed a framework to assess the fire performance of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) façades. The framework identifies key fire risk factors and prioritizes measures to prevent ignition and limit fire spread.
“Although previous studies have investigated the fire behavior of PV materials and modules, systematic fire risk assessment and resilience optimization for BIPV façades remain limited,” corresponding author Yu Wang told pv magazine. “In this work, data-driven sensitivity analysis and expert-judgment-based weighting methods were used to identify the dominant fire risk factors among 16 indicators covering electrical conditions, environmental factors, module materials, and installation conditions.”
Wang said the team also conducted a fire resilience optimization analysis based on the fire performance assessment to translate the most significant risk factors into practical mitigation measures.
“These measures cover ignition prevention, fire-spread suppression, monitoring, maintenance, and emergency response, extending the analysis from risk identification to engineering application,” he said.
The researchers began by establishing 16 fire risk indicators: temperature differences between shaded and unshaded areas; aging of PV modules and associated equipment; DC voltage and current levels; circuit contact resistance; wind load; dust accumulation; ambient temperature; natural disasters such as lightning; module glass thickness; glass type; encapsulation material fire performance; module light transmittance; installation spacing; installation configuration; installation angle; and shielding width.
Drawing on previous and ongoing experiments and published studies, the researchers used normalized variance contribution (NVC) analysis to assess variations in the indicators’ normalized risk scores. Nine experts from Asia and Europe, including university researchers, fire service leaders, fire investigators, and senior engineers, also evaluated the indicators using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A fuzzy version of AHP accounted for uncertainty in expert judgments, while data perturbation tests assessed the stability of the NVC rankings.
The team linked the dominant risk factors to 15 safety measures: electroluminescence inspection; compliant equipment and wiring; rapid shutdown; encapsulant flammability ratings; module layout and spacing; module and surrounding fire loads; DC arc-fault detection; drone-based infrared inspection; machine learning-based detection; inspection and maintenance frequency; fault diagnosis and maintenance coverage; cleaning frequency; safe firefighting distances and electric shock prevention; extinguishing agent selection; and firefighting strategies and standards. The same experts ranked the measures using AHP.
“The most surprising finding was that the data-driven NVC analysis and expert-based AHP and triangular fuzzy number (TFN)-AHP assessments consistently identified five dominant risk factors despite differences in their overall rankings,” Wang said. “DC voltage and current magnitude ranked first in both the data-driven analysis and the expert-based assessments. Equipment aging, circuit contact resistance, module glass type, and encapsulation fire performance also consistently emerged as important factors. This highlights the need to consider electrical ignition hazards alongside the materials that influence fire development.”
Further uncertainty testing showed that the same six indicators – DC voltage and current magnitude, equipment aging, module glass type, circuit contact resistance, glass thickness, and encapsulation fire performance – remained the highest-ranked in the NVC analysis across all valid scenarios, with rank correlations exceeding 0.99.
The experts assigned a combined weight of 60.83% to ignition prevention and fire-spread suppression measures, with rapid shutdown ranking first among individual measures at 19.62%.
The researchers presented the framework in “Framework for fire risk assessment and resilience optimization of building-integrated photovoltaic façades,” published in Applied Thermal Engineering. The research team included scientists from the University of Science and Technology of China and Italy’s University of Trieste.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: [email protected].
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: [email protected].
Comments
Please login to comment
Thursday, October 29, 2026
11:00 am – 12:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Thursday, November 5, 2026
10:00 am – 11:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
The new issue of pv magazine Global is out now!
Available in print and digital – get your copy today!
pv magazine USA hosts its multi-day virtual event on U.S. solar and energy storage, covering domestic manufacturing, distributed energy and the growing role of solar-plus-storage in meeting AI-driven power demand.
pv magazine hosts its four-day virtual event on European solar and energy storage, exploring market opportunities, solar-plus-storage business cases, technical quality, and cybersecurity in the years ahead.
pv magazine Session returns to NetZero Milan as Knowledge Partner, organizing and moderating a two-hour conference on the evolving global solar supply chain.
Get your ticket at a discounted rate with pv magazine.
Join pv magazine for an expert session exploring quality, technology and the challenges of scaling India’s solar industry.
Friday, October 23, 2026
11:00 am – 12:00 pm CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
Monday, October 26, 2026
10:30 am – 11:30 am CEST, Berlin, Paris, Madrid
You have no items in your basket.
