Türkiye’s energy regulator has decreased the grid fee for approximately 800 unlicensed solar plants that have completed their ten-year purchase guarantee period by 68%.
Image: Tarik Haiga/Unsplash
Türkiye’s Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EPDK) is lowering the grid fee for first-generation unlicensed solar power plants that came into operation before 2019 following the expiration of their ten-year feed-in tariff.
According to a document on the country’s official journal, the fee will be applied at TRY 0.656 ($0.014)/kWh, down from a prior TRY 2.081/kWh, representing a reduction of 68%.
Unlicensed solar power plants in Türkiye are primarily designed for self-consumption up to a 5 MW limit with the potential to feed excess electricity back to the grid via net-metering. They make up the majority of Türkiye’s operational solar fleet, with data from national transmission system operator TEİAS highlighting that unlicensed solar accounted for over 22 GW of the almost 25 GW of solar added in Türkiye by the end of last year, including over 4.1 GW installed last year alone.
In January, Bahadır Sercan Gümüş, energy analyst at Ember, told pv magazine he expects unlicensed solar to continue as the main driver of Türkiye’s solar market this year.
An update from state-run news agency Anadolu Agency (AA) says the temporary regulation covers approximately 800 unlicensed solar facilities with a total capacity ranging between 500 MW to 550 MW.
AA’s analysis says the grid fee reduction is aiming to lower the economic burden on former unlicensed solar power plant investors and prevent such solar plants from halting production due to cost pressures.
Hakan Erkan, Secretary General of the Solar Energy Manufacturers and Industry Association (GENSED), has supported the move, advising that power plants have been forced to suspend production to avoid losses when the market clearing price fell below the distribution fee.
“Due to the fact that the inverters in some power plants with old technology were not suitable for remote switching on and off, it became necessary to have physical personnel on site,” Erkan said. “This situation created a serious burden for the investor, facing both energy production loss and additional personnel costs.”
 
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
More articles from Patrick Jowett
Please be mindful of our community standards.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.
Legal Notice Terms and Conditions Data Privacy © pv magazine 2026
Δ
This website uses cookies to anonymously count visitor numbers. View our privacy policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to “allow cookies” to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click “Accept” below then you are consenting to this.
Close

source